ESPP (European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform) supports the need for a Circular Economy Act to accelerate recycling, facilitate the market for secondary materials and incentivise their use. This Act should address nutrients and the biobased economy, as well as EU Critical and Strategic Raw Materials.
ESPP European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 260483415852-40
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #20 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- partnership with Global phosphorus / nutrient networks: UNEP-GPNM (global), SPA (North America)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
- Head office
- Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ESPP in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ESPP European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ESPP European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform filed 14 positions between 14 May 2024 and 3 Aug 2026, across 13 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
ESPP welcomes the announced aim to revise EU rules on public procurement towards sustainability and resilience. This should be coherent with the EU Circular Economy Act, planned for 2026, and with implementation of the EU Critical Raw Materials Act.
For coherence, the Taxonomy Climate criteria for anaerobic digestion should be modified to allow phosphorus recovery as per the criteria of the Taxonomy Environment (Circular Economy) criteria. The Climate criteria (2021/2139) currently require that digestates from eligible AD processes are used as fertilising materials, meeting the requirements of the EU Fertilising Products Regulation 2019/1009 CMCs 4-5: - pages…
ESPP welcomes the Phosphorus recovery from waste water (Taxonomy Environment criteria 2023/2486 Annex II $2.1) coherent with the inclusion of phosphate rock on the EU list of Critical Raw Materials (CRM Act 2024/1252) and with the principle of phosphorus reuse and recycling targets of art. 20 of the revised Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (2024/2049).
ESPP welcomes that the Call for Evidence for the BioTech 2 consultation of 10th June identified fertilisers as an area for action, citing creation of lead markets and simplification of legislation. This is coherent with the EU Fertiliser Action Plan (19th May 2026) which states that the Biotech Act will prepare measures to create lead markets for bio-based fertilising products.
ESPP welcomes that the Biotech II Call for Evidence identifies fertilisers as an area for action, citing creation of lead markets and simplification of legislation for (bio-derived) fertilisers. Biotech II should recognise the Importance of recycled nutrients for fertiliser supply resilience, food security and EU competitiveness, and engage actions for a single market for secondary nutrients across Europe, support…
ESPP welcomes the clarification of Taxonomy criteria for nutrient recycling in composting and anaerobic digestion of biowaste, but regrets that other proposed clarifications and facilitations for nutrient recycling are not taken into account.
ESPP (European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform) underlines the need to maintain and pursue the objectives of the EU Green Deal to achieve both environmental and economic sustainability objectives. Green Deal objectives for climate change, energy consumption and nutrient loss reduction are key to EU strategic resilience by making industry, agriculture and food production more efficient and less dependent on imported…
ESPP welcomes the proposal to exempt from the 170 kgN/ha limit THREE (only) specified recycled nutrient products recovered from manure, subject to their being of consistent quality. This will enable a level playing field for consistent, quality recycled products from manure, limited to those which are essentially similar to synthetic inorganic fertilisers.
ESPP welcomes the proposal to establish a Critical Raw Materials Centre to support CRM projects in accessing public and private finance and address market and supply chain challenges. There are currently a confusing number of EU initiatives and EU-funded centres: Critical Chemicals Alliance, CRM Facility, Strategic Projects, CRM Alliance, SCRREEN (1, 2 and 3), EIT Raw Materials, Fertilisers Action Plan, Raw…
ESPP welcomes the cited aim of the FPR to enable large-scale production of circular fertilisers. But today the FPR is failing to achieve this: few recycled fertilisers are CE-Mark. Establishing why, and how to resolve this, should be the Evaluation priorities. ESPP (European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform) represents 50+ members in nutrient management (companies, R&D, public bodies).
ESPP (European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform) welcomes that the proposed update on Battery Labelling maintains and clarifies the obligation to declare Critical Raw Materials present at > 0.1% w/w (this obligation is already included in the Annexes of 2023/1254). We note that the CRM Act 2024/1252 Annex II (list of CRMs) includes both Phosphate Rock and Phosphorus.
For the CRM Phosphate Rock (P), the European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform ESPP notes that the following materials, potentially significant for phosphorus recovery and recycling, are missing in the list proposed in the draft regulation annex: - Animal manures and slurry these contain in total a similar quantity of P to that used in mineral fertilisers. - Agricultural run-off water, e.g.
ESPP (European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform) welcomes the proposal to include a number of animal by-products into the FPR CMC10. These materials have proven their agronomic value and safety by many years of use under national regulations in different Member States.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 10 files in common
- European Biogas Association · 8 files in common
- EurEau · 8 files in common
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 7 files in common
- Recycling Europe · 7 files in common
Showing 5 of 496.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ESPP European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.