COSMED fully supports the ambition of the Circular Economy Act to boost EU competitiveness while accelerating the shift to more sustainable production, circular models, and decarbonisation. However, we would like to stress that the transition towards a circular economy must be pursued without losing sight of the health and safety considerations specific to certain sectors.
COSMED
Industry association · France · EU Transparency Register 995341033700-55
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #62 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Member of SMEunited : www.smeunited.eu
- SBS expert in the ISO TC 217 on Cosmetics : www.iso.org
- SBS expert in the CEN TC 392 on Cosmetics : www.cen.eu
- AFNOR representative in the CEN TC 352 on Nanomaterials : www.cen.eu
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade unions and professional associations
- Head office
- Aix-en-Provence, France
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track COSMED in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at COSMED? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
COSMED filed 5 positions between 10 Oct 2022 and 2 Dec 2025, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
First of all, COSMED supports overall objectives of the Green Claim Directive to protect consumers and companies against greenwashing. However, we alert on the need to maintain a rationale balance to avoid disproportionate burden on companies and especially on SMEs and to leave the possibility for SMEs to make voluntary environmental claims in an accessible way.
Since its application in 2013, the CPR has continuously demonstrated its performance in achieving those 2 objectives and CPR is still considered as the global standard for international cosmetic regulations. We emphasize that CPR is the only regulation requiring a safety assessment of every product placed on the market.
COSMED welcomes the possibility to comment on the proposal which aims to strengthen the governance of ECHA. We fully understand the need to ensure the best use of expertise and resources of European agencies, however we stress that it is also essential to keep an efficient process ensuring a high level of protection of human health and a well-functioning internal market.
COSMED welcomes the possibility to comment on the proposal which aims to adjust the mandate and structure of ECHA. We embrace the objective of the CSS and fully understand the need to ensure the best use of expertise and resources of European agencies, however we stress that it is essential to keep an efficient process ensuring a high level of protection of human health and the environment and a well-functioning…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 4 files in common
- European Environmental Bureau · 4 files in common
- The Polish Union of the Cosmetics Industry · 4 files in common
- Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · 3 files in common
- BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 114.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from COSMED’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.