The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the revision of the EU legislation on hazard classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals (CLP). CIEL and its many partners in the EDC Free Coalition have been advocating for the establishment of horizontal criteria for endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) for many years.
Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
NGO · Switzerland · EU Transparency Register 001245815997-85
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #162 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
- United Nations Environment Programme
- UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- Organization of American States
- Green Climate Fund
- and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
- Head office
- Geneva, Switzerland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Center in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) filed 8 positions between 7 Aug 2020 and 4 May 2026, across 8 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the revision of EU rules on food contact materials (FCM). In order to address the identified issues, CIEL supports option 2: the creation of a new regulatory framework. The new framework should be based on CHEM Trust’s 5 key principles: 1.
In order for the EU Ocean Act to ensure the health, resilience, and productivity of the ocean, it must advance solutions to the global threat posed by fossil fuel production and use. From oil and gas activity, to the full lifecycle of plastics, chemical use and the promotion of false solutions such as geoengineering, the fossil economy and speculative technologies that would prolong it are driving the triple…
The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the revision of the REACH Regulation and the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA). We welcome the ambitious commitments established in the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) and call on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all the promised actions.
The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to this consultation. Growing scientific research has demonstrated the increasing presence of microplastics in the environment, including food, water, and air. The unintentional release of microplastics represents an unregulated portion of the toxic life cycle of plastic that needs to urgently be addressed.
Investments in CO2 transport infrastructure risk diverting critical time and resources away from more effective climate action, while simultaneously prolonging reliance on fossil fuels. Building large-scale CO2 transport infrastructure to support Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS), Carbon Capture & Utilisation (CCU) or Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) approaches like Bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) or Direct Air Capture with CCS…
The EU should not use international carbon credits to meet its 2040 emissions reduction target, but should rely wholly on domestic emission reductions. To keep temperature rise to 1.5°C requires urgent action addressing the root cause of the climate crisis chiefly the production and use of fossil fuels curbing emissions at their source.
The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) is grateful for the opportunity to respond to this consultation. We call on the European Commission to “protect human health and the environment from persistent organic pollutants” (POPs) in the update of POPs content levels in waste, in line with the objective of the EU Regulation on POPs and the Stockholm Convention.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 191.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.