Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CHE

ChemSec

NGO · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 95363765837-60

16
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
14
legislative files
of 665 tracked
7
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #61 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • ChemSec is a member of the European Environment Bureau (EEB) and the International POPS Elimination Network (IPEN).

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
International Chemical Secretariat (ChemSec)
Head office
Göteborg, Sweden

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track ChemSec in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow ChemSec

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at ChemSec? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

ChemSec filed 16 positions between 4 Jun 2018 and 5 Jun 2026, across 14 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.

2018 · 1 filed2020 · 1 filed2021 · 5 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 4 filed2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Circular Economy Actfiled 6 Nov 2025PDFsource

Unknown or toxic chemical content in recycled material is a main hurdle for increased use in products. While many companies have very high ambitions to increase this use, the material available is often not meeting their standards that are in place to ensure safety.

Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulationfiled 2 Nov 2020source

ChemSec supports the Commissions ambition to address the prerequisites of producing sustainable products, in line with the Green Deal, the Circular Economy Action Plan and the Chemical Strategy. ChemSec is positive towards widening of the ecodesign directive beyond energy related products and the establishment of overarching product sustainability principles.To achieve useful and relevant principles it is essential…

Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixturesfiled 30 Mar 2023PDFsource

ChemSec welcomes the Commissions proposal for a revision of the CLP Regulation. We share the aim of modernising and streamlining the regulation to make it more efficient and protective. However, we have some important recommendations to improve safety for consumers and the environment. We strongly supported the delegated act to include EDCs, PBTs, vPvBs, PMTs and vPvMs as new hazard classes.

Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixturesfiled 1 Jun 2021PDFsource

ChemSec welcomes the proposed changes and additions to the CLP regulation, as laid out in the Chemicals Strategy. We fully support the aim to urgently achieve a better protection of human health and the environment through more efficient identification, labelling and communication on hazardous chemicals.

EU taxonomy - review of the climate delegated actfiled 14 Apr 2026source

General Remarks This is the third revision of Appendix C in four years. Each revision creates additional administrative burden, forces practitioners to re-examine and re-report, and generates confusion across the market. This is the opposite of simplification and good governance, and it erodes trust in the Taxonomy as a stable and reliable framework. The direction of travel is also wrong.

Revision of EU rules on food contact materialsfiled 29 Jan 2021PDFsource

ChemSec welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation on the roadmap for the Revision of EU rules on food contact materials (FCMs). We recognize and appreciate that the Commission in its roadmap identify a number of troubling issues that we believe urgently needs to be addressed. The most striking issue is that there is currently not a coherent system for regulation of substances of concern.

Urban wastewater treatment. Recastfiled 2 Feb 2023source

ChemSec comments on the proposal for a directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (COM(2022) 541 final) ChemSec welcomes the EU Commission's proposal for a revised urban wastewater treatment directive (UWWTD) and would just like to raise one important point in this consultation- the need to include the removal of PFAS in the advanced treatment requirements.

Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsfiled 4 Apr 2024PDFsource

ChemSec comment on the public consultation of the proposal for a regulation establishing a common data platform on chemicals ChemSec welcomes the Proposal for a Regulation establishing a common data platform on chemicals, which was published by the European Commission on the 7th of December 2023.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsfiled 16 Aug 2022source

ChemSec welcomes the Commission´s initiative and we support the aims listed. As identified in the fitness check, there is a need to enable data sharing and that both authorities, industry, NGOs and citizen should have better access to data on problematic substances. The reuse of data is an obvious way of decreasing the burden on both authorities and industry.

Digital labelling of EU fertilising productsfiled 20 Sept 2021source

ChemSec thanks the Commission for the opportunity to leave comments to the Inception Impact Assessment on the simplification and digitalization of labels on chemicals. ChemSec agrees with the general idea of creating a harmonized digital labeling system for chemical product information.

Towards an EU Product Policy Framework contributing to the Circular Economyfiled 4 Jun 2018source

ChemSec welcomes the work the Commission is conducting on Circular Economy. However, we sense through the number of consultations and events that the important perspective of the progressive down stream users as well as the recyclers have not been given the appropriate space. Increasingly, downstream users are realising that hazardous substances mean exposing customers to a risk.

Restriction on CMRs in childcare articlesfiled 5 Jun 2026PDFsource

ChemSec welcomes and supports in general the proposed restriction of CMR substances in childcare articles. We urge the REACH Committee to conclude swiftly and the Commission to adopt the restriction as soon as possible. We support the dynamic link to CLP which makes the restriction effective, preventative and forward looking.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put ChemSec next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 427.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from ChemSec’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.