Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2021/0106(COD) · In Force

Artificial Intelligence Act

403 submissions from 343 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 437 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 403 from organizations. Not shown: 19 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 15 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →

Committee LIBERapporteur Brando Benifei, Dragoş Tudorache
  1. Implementing act adopted: Artificial Intelligence Act - arrangements for the conduct of proceedings by the Commission · 19 Jul 2026
  2. Implementing act adopted: Artificial Intelligence Act - arrangements for the conduct of proceedings by the Commission · 11 Mar 2026
  3. Published in the Official Journal · 12 Jul 2024
  4. Signed · 13 Jun 2024
  5. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 21 May 2024

Who showed up

235 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 98 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.4 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 235Civil society 98Public authorities, academia, other 68

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice. An identical text filed by several organizations counts once: 2 submissions here repeat 2 texts word for word and are folded into them.

What the room declares

181 of 343
in the EU Register
1,035
full-time lobbying staff
€165.9M+
declared costs a year
696
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 14 Jun 2020 — it ran from 20 Feb 2020.

Policy area
Digital & tech (DG CNECT)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
LIBE
Commission reference
COM(2021)206

How it got here

  1. Public consultation14 Jun 2020
  2. Impact assess incep10 Sept 2020
  3. Proposal for a regulation6 Aug 2021

Showing 25 of 250 submissions on this page · page 1 of 2 · 403 across the file. Search the whole file

E

Equinet

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Equinet welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Equinet further wishes to reiterate its support for this legislative initiative as a timely and valuable opportunity to ensure that the EU becomes the global leader in regulating for AI-enabled technologies that protect and advance fundamental rights, societal wellbeing…

LinkedInX
AA

AI Austria

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

AI Austria welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act. We commend the work of the European Commission in developing a framework for artificial intelligence. In certain areas, we believe there are topics to be clarified and considered, which we seek to bring to your attention.

LinkedInX
DE

Digitalcourage e.V.

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

This submission to the AIA consultation is sent on behalf of Digitalcourage e.V, a German NGO that advocates for fundamental rights, privacy and protecting personal data. Digitalcourage is composed of people from a variety of backgrounds who explore technology and politics with a critical mindset, and who want to shape both with a focus on human dignity.

LinkedInX
UB

UC Berkeley Center for Human-Compatible AI

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

The EU AI Act is an important step in the right direction toward developing beneficial AI. We particularly welcome the following elements: - The broad definition of high-risk systems as those potentially impacting health, safety, and fundamental rights, with flexibility to expand - The recognition and prohibition of “powerful tools for manipulative, exploitative and social control practices” - The establishment of a…

LinkedInX
C

CrowdStrike

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

REQUEST FOR COMMENT RESPONSE Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts August 6 2021 I. INTRODUCTION In response to the European Commission’s request for public consultation on Artificial Intelligence, CrowdStrike offers the following views.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
FT

Fair Trials

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Fair Trials welcomes the fact that the EU is taking a much-needed legislative approach to regulate and limit the use of artificial intelligence (AI), and that it recognises that the use of AI in law enforcement and criminal justice can have serious implications for fundamental rights.

LinkedInX
AP

American Property Casualty Insurance Association

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

August 6, 2021 APCIA Response to European Commission Proposed AI Regulation The American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the European Commission’s (Commission) proposed artificial intelligence Regulation (proposed Regulation).

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX

CLAIRE welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback and supports the European Commission's drive towards a balance between regulation and innovation, where citizens’ rights are well protected, while facilitating investment and innovation. However, we find that the sum of the initiatives, as they are currently planned, does not achieve this balance.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Cambridge

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Dear European Commission, Please note that this contribution is a personal contribution, and that it does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the institutions I'm employed by. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the proposed AI Act. I'd like to focus on the risk impact approach taken in the proposed Act.

LinkedInX
US

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Comments concerning the European Commission’s Proposed Artificial Intelligence Act August 6, 2021 The U.S. Chamber of Commerce welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commission’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“Act” or “AI Act).

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
DB

Dr. Bublitz & Prof. Douglas

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

This feedback on the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act draws attention to shortcomings with respect to one specific issue: manipulative influences via AI systems on the thought and behavior of persons. It is jointly authored by Dr.

LinkedInX
IF

Institute for Social Science Research e.V. (ISF Munich)

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

The Institute for Social Science Research e.V. (ISF Munich) (Germany) welcomes the EU proposal on the regulation of AI. From our own research we would like to contribute to the consultation: On risk assessment (see 5.2.2) as well as classification of the risk of AI systems (Art.7): The limits of operationalizability of risks must also be considered; in particular regarding latent non-reflective harm to individuals…

LinkedInX
WE

World Employment Confederation - Europe

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Main points: - WEC-Europe welcomes the creation of a regulatory framework of AI that will improve predictability and a level playing field for the application of AI. - Following its Code of Conduct, WEC-Europe is dedicated to improving labour market inclusiveness and fighting (un)conscious human bias from the recruitment process, irrespective of the software used in its services.

LinkedInX
GI

Getty Images (UK) Ltd

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enable innovation and opportunities in the creative sector and will have a lasting impact on the development of the visual content industries. We believe that in establishing a legal framework for AI and ML, it is essential to show respect for IP and privacy issues and to foster an ecosystem that is ethical and transparent.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
AI

Amnesty International

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

The attached position paper sets out Amnesty International’s concerns around the key gaps and shortcomings in the EU’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. As it stands the proposed regulation falls far short of the measures that will be required to meaningfully protect people from harmful AI systems in the EU and globally.

LinkedInX
D

DIGITALEUROPE

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Please find attached our detailed feedback, and a summary below. DIGITALEUROPE welcomes the European Commission’s legislative proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (‘AI Act’). We have been a key partner to EU institutions on AI topics for years, having notably participated in the work of the Commission’s AI High-Level Expert Group.

LinkedInX
BF

BETTER FINANCE

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Ref: EU Commission consultation on Artificial Intelligence (AI)- Ethical and Legal requirements Link to consultation: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12527-Artificialintelligence-ethical-and-legal-requirements_en BETTER FINANCE’s feedback on the EU Commission proposal on Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act) and…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
A

ALLAI

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS Catelijne Muller Virginia Dignum August 6, 2021 Submission to the public consultation on: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL LAYING DOWN HARMONISED RULES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT) AND AMENDING CERTAIN UNION LEGISLATIVE ACTS For (press) enquiries: [email removed] © 2021 ALLAI, The Netherlands 2…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX

EFPA, The European Federation of Psychologists (established 1981) has the mission to develop and apply psychology for a positive impact on European society and beyond. EFPA publications are regularly consulted to inform EU policy and process. Now consisting of 38 European country associations, EFPA represents almost half of the world’s Psychologists whose members are required to observe professional standards.

LinkedInX

We are a group of academic researchers on AI with positions at the University of Cambridge’s Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence (LCFI) and Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. We have published dozens of academic papers and reports on the ethics and governance of artificial intelligence.

LinkedInX
AF

Avaaz Foundation

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Avaaz is the world’s largest online civic movement. Our 69 million members, including 22 million in Europe, campaign for urgent action on the key issues of our time - the climate crisis, ecological collapse and the erosion of democracy.

LinkedInX
JI

Johner Institut GmbH

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Input to the European Commission public consultation on the proposed 'Regulation laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (AI Act)' by the Johner Institute 1. Preliminary remarks First of all, we would like to thank the EU Commission for the opportunity to discuss and comment on this important proposal.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
CC

Climate Change AI

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Climate change is one of the most urgent challenges of our time, and addressing it will require rapid and concerted action across many sectors of the economy. As AI has increasingly transformational effects on society, it is therefore critical to holistically account for the effects — both positive and negative — that AI may have on climate change.

LinkedInX
GA

5G Automotive Association

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

The 5G Automotive Association (5GAA) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Artificial Intelligence Act and share our recommendations to help the EU adopt future-proof legislation accelerating the market entry of connected and automated vehicles and smart mobility services while ensuring innovation in the long run.

LinkedInX
FD

Fédération Française de l'Assurance

· · filed 6 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

The French Insurance Federation (FFA) supports the implementation of a framework for an ethical use of AI: Human-Centric, unbiased, transparent, and explainable. French residents welcome the Commission’s proposal for a risk-based regulatory framework with differentiated rules according to the risks presented by AI uses that makes it is possible to encourage technological innovation, while Guaranteeing European…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 403 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.