Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
INF

INFOBALT

Industry association · Lithuania

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track INFOBALT in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at INFOBALT? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files INFOBALT engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from INFOBALT or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

INFOBALT filed 2 positions between 28 Jul 2021 and 10 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2021 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Digital Fitness Checkfiled 10 Mar 2026PDFsource

INFOBALT, the Lithuanian association representing the countrys DigiTech sector, welcomes the European Commissions initiative to conduct a Digital Fitness Check assessing the cumulative impact of the EUs digital rulebook.

Liability for defective productsfiled 28 Jul 2021source

It is important that the complexity of the artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem is taken into account, while maintaining a balance of commitment between different stakeholders. It will rarely be possible or effective for providers of general AI systems to manage in absolute terms all risks associated with potential applications in high-risk systems, as currently foreseen.

Filed in Lithuanian · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put INFOBALT next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 15.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from INFOBALT’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.