NGO · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 681704440014-85not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
ALLAI filed 2 positions between 10 Sept 2020 and 6 Aug 2021, across 1 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
First and foremost, we would like express our support for the European Commission's efforts to establish an appropriate regulatory framework for AI. In establishing such a framework, one should both look at existing laws and regulations and determine if they are 'fit for purpose' for a world with AI as well as consider establishing new rules where current legislation is not adequate.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ALLAI next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ALLAI’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
