We propose the addition of an article mandating the requirement contained in Whereas clause 60 (repeated below) for third parties to cooperate with providers and users. This would provide legal certainty for all actors in the value chain. It would ease the compliance burden for providers and AI value chain actors. It would increase public trust in AI.
Global Digital Foundation
Academic / research · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 686462040358-12not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Oct 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Global in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Global Digital Foundation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Global Digital Foundation filed 4 positions between 20 Nov 2017 and 6 Aug 2021, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Policy analysts and policymakers are responding to AI as both a threat to human rights and as a potential savour of humanity from discrimination. This response rests on two questionable ideas. The first is that AI’s supposed human-like intelligence could give it a mind or a ‘will’.
The European Commission has identified a number of undesirable practices which it says threaten Europe’s successful transition to the Digital Single Market. While the Commission’s study and stakeholder consultation has found some questionable practices, fixing them will not require the more intrusive of the economic regulations which its “Reception Impact Assessment” is contemplating.
The European Commission is considering regulatory options that could be applied to the relationship between internet platforms and their businesses users. Based on consultation with stakeholders and a study commissioned from ZEW-Gutachten und Forschungsberichte, it has identified a number of undesirable practices which it says threaten Europe’s successful transition to the Digital Single Market.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Global Digital Foundation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 23.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Global Digital Foundation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.