Equinet welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Equinet further wishes to reiterate its support for this legislative initiative as a timely and valuable opportunity to ensure that the EU becomes the global leader in regulating for AI-enabled technologies that protect and advance fundamental rights, societal wellbeing…
EQU
Equinet
NGO · Belgium
identity not settledMore than one register entry could match this filer, so we have not linked it to any of them. The filings shown are those under this exact name.
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Equinet in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Equinet? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Equinet filed 4 positions between 6 Aug 2021 and 18 Sept 2023, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2021 · 1 filed2023 · 3 filed
What they argued
Equinet strongly supports the first-ever LGBTIQ Strategy. It is essential to further protect LGBTIQ+ persons in the EU against discrimination and hatred. With this policy document, the European Commission reaffirmed that equality and human rights are the core values of the European Union while ensuring that LGBTIQ+ persons have better access to healthcare, justice, education and family rights.
Equinet welcomes the Commissions proposals, with some suggestions for improvement On multiple and intersectional discrimination, the Directives should explicitly acknowledge and name these two concepts, with a view to ensuring coherence with other legislative proposals of EU equal treatment law.
Equinet welcomes the Commissions proposals, with some suggestions for improvement On the legal basis, given the complexity of two parallel Directives setting out standards for Equality Bodies, their provisions shall remain identical. Diverging or even contradicting provisions in the two Directives would lead to a confusing and ineffective system and would undermine the desired objectives.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Equinet next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Equinet’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.