Developers Alliance welcomes the proposed revision of the Cybersecurity Act, to streamline the governance of the EU cybersecurity policy and the harmonized certification framework. Key points: 1. Strengthen ENISAs mandate, to provide independent technical expertise throughout the legislative process, including the implementation and enforcement phases. 2.
DA
Developers Alliance
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 3249308102006-57
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #455 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2026
in the register since
Declares membership of
- European Internet Forum
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Washington, DC, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Developers in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Developers Alliance? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Developers Alliance filed 4 positions between 22 Nov 2017 and 11 May 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2017 · 1 filed2020 · 1 filed2021 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Our mission is to provide a collective voice for software developers and to represent their interests on matters affecting the software development ecosystem. From this perspective, we see the potential benefits of the DMA, but also predictable spillover effects on certain digital ecosystems, raising the cost of doing business for developers, as well as a negative impact on investment in the EU digital markets.
Developers Alliance welcomes the opportunity to provide its feedback on the IIA on ex-ante regulation for large online platforms, as part of the Digital Services Act package. Software developers, like other entrepreneurs, need a predictable regulatory environment. The proposed regulatory initiative raises concerns from this perspective.
In response to the European Commission’s announcement of their intention to introduce new legislation to govern the relationship between platforms and businesses, the Developers Alliance surveyed over 110 European-based developers and publishers on their experiences, in an effort to gain a more robust understanding on their relationship with platforms and examine the need for regulatory intervention.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Bitkom e.V. · 3 files in common
- ACT | The App Association · 3 files in common
- ITI - Information Technology Industry Council · 3 files in common
- Microsoft Corporation · 3 files in common
- European Savings and Retail Banking Group · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 33.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Developers Alliance’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.