As the European Commission (EC) looks to modernize the EU’s batteries legislation, Amnesty International calls on the EC to ensure that human rights and environmental protection go hand-in-hand with the EU’s efforts to transition to green alternatives and address climate change.
AI
Amnesty International
NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 11063928073-34
3
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 583 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #305 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
10
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
6
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Human Rights Democracy Network (HRDN)
- ECRE →
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Amnesty International Limited (AI LTD)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Amnesty in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Amnesty International? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Amnesty International filed 3 positions between 9 Jul 2020 and 2 Feb 2022, across 3 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 1 filed2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed
What they argued
Amnesty International welcomes the DMA’s focus on levelling the playing field and addressing the dominant role of gatekeepers over the online environment. However, Amnesty believes the DMA should put more focus on end-users and be more ambitious to allow competitors to the gatekeepers to emerge that offer more choice and better conditions to end-users. 1.
Amnesty International is strongly critical of the European Commission for the decision to appease the violations committed by the Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, instead of following up with a prompt and robust infringement process to uphold EU law, as mandated under the Treaties.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Amnesty International next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Amnesty International’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.