Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
AI

Amnesty International

NGO · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 11063928073-34

9
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
8
legislative files
of 665 tracked
7
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1107 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #149 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

10
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Human Rights Democracy Network (HRDN)
  • ECRE →

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Amnesty International Limited (AI LTD)
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Amnesty in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Amnesty International

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Amnesty International? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Amnesty International filed 9 positions between 9 Jul 2020 and 24 Oct 2025, across 8 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.

2020 · 2 filed2021 · 3 filed2022 · 2 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materialsfiled 30 Jun 2023PDFsource

To ensure a just transition, the following changes must be made to the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA)*: Certification schemes: The CRMA must remove the reliance on certification schemes to demonstrate Strategic Project compliance with project requirements. These schemes vary significantly in their transparency, requirements and frequency and quality of assessments.

Artificial Intelligence Actfiled 6 Aug 2021PDFsource

The attached position paper sets out Amnesty International’s concerns around the key gaps and shortcomings in the EU’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. As it stands the proposed regulation falls far short of the measures that will be required to meaningfully protect people from harmful AI systems in the EU and globally.

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligencefiled 23 May 2022source

Civil liability and access to justice: The proposal includes a fault-based liability regime allowing people affected by corporate abuse to obtain judicial remedy. But major barriers to justice still remain as tort law in Member States puts the burden of proof on the claimants. Victims will need to provide evidence of the company’s breach of its duties which normally requires access to internal company information.

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligencefiled 7 Oct 2020source

Amnesty International welcomes the Commission’s intention to launch a legislative initiative establishing mandatory rules for corporates not to harm human rights and the environment and to carry out due diligence and to request corporate directors to integrate wider societal and sustainability interests into business decisions.

Digital Fairness Actfiled 24 Oct 2025PDFsource

Amnesty Internationals research shows that many Big Tech companies rely on and profit from a fundamentally abusive business model. Far from their claims of being a digital town square or a place for discovery and connection, online platforms have evolved over time to become ever more manipulative and extractive rather than empowering, informative and educational.

Digital Services Actfiled 30 Mar 2021PDFsource

Amnesty International welcomes that the Digital Services Act (DSA) increases accountability of providers of online services, improves transparency of platforms’ practices and establishes clearer rules for content moderation. The fact that the DSA upholds the conditional liability exemptions and the prohibition of a general monitoring obligation to find illegal activity is equally welcome.

Batteries and waste batteriesfiled 9 Jul 2020PDFsource

As the European Commission (EC) looks to modernize the EU’s batteries legislation, Amnesty International calls on the EC to ensure that human rights and environmental protection go hand-in-hand with the EU’s efforts to transition to green alternatives and address climate change.

Digital Markets Actfiled 30 Mar 2021PDFsource

Amnesty International welcomes the DMA’s focus on levelling the playing field and addressing the dominant role of gatekeepers over the online environment. However, Amnesty believes the DMA should put more focus on end-users and be more ambitious to allow competitors to the gatekeepers to emerge that offer more choice and better conditions to end-users. 1.

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Polandfiled 2 Feb 2022PDFsource

Amnesty International is strongly critical of the European Commission for the decision to appease the violations committed by the Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, instead of following up with a prompt and robust infringement process to uphold EU law, as mandated under the Treaties.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Amnesty International next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 246.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Amnesty International’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.