Industry association · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 279128116707-71
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #684 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track techUK in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at techUK? so we know who speaks for it.
techUK filed 7 positions between 9 Mar 2018 and 6 Aug 2021, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
techUK response to the Commission’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act Ref. Ares(2021)5003749 - 06/08/2021 techUK welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commission’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA).
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
techUK welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Inception Impact Assessment proposed by the European Commission on the proposed legal act on Artificial Intelligence. Please find below our comments on the legislative options outlined: Option 1- EU “soft law” (non-legislative) approach techUK supports a soft law approach to AI and building upon existing initiatives, such as the AI HLEG assessment list and the…
techUK welcomes several positive aspects about the proposal and commends efforts to promote trusted data-sharing. However, techUK members would like the European Commission to consider the following recommendations: Greater clarity is needed on the scope of data sharing intermediaries and what is meant by publicly held ‘protected data’ and ‘highly sensitive data’.
While welcoming several positive aspects about the proposal and commending efforts to promote trusted data-sharing, techUK members would like the European Commission to consider the following recommendations: The scope and requirements for data intermediaries should be clarified.
techUK would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft implementing act for new standard contractual clauses (SCCs) for transferring personal data to non-EU countries.
Estimated savings, complexity & duty cycle Industry would caution on the increase of the estimated energy saving potential. Projecting PC usage and energy consumption growth to 2030 is meaningless; projections involving digital technology further than five years ahead provides no degree of accuracy or certainty.
Estimated savings, complexity & duty cycle Industry would caution on the increase of the estimated energy saving potential. Projecting PC usage and energy consumption growth to 2030 is meaningless; projections involving digital technology further than five years ahead provides no degree of accuracy or certainty.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put techUK next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 83.
Everything on this page comes from techUK’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.