Dear European Commission, Please note that this contribution is a personal contribution, and that it does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the institutions I'm employed by. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the proposed AI Act. I'd like to focus on the risk impact approach taken in the proposed Act.
UC
University of Cambridge
Academic / research · Netherlands
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track University in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at University of Cambridge? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
University of Cambridge filed 2 positions between 6 Aug 2021 and 12 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2021 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
The Advanced Materials Act (AMA) represents a decisive opportunity to translate Europes research excellence into industrial leadership. It must unlock the full potential of AMs´ innovation by facilitating the commercialization of research, supporting circular and sustainable solutions, and ensuring dual-use readiness for technologies that strengthen Europes security, resilience, and strategic autonomy.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put University of Cambridge next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from University of Cambridge’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.