Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Digital Product Passport Registry (DPP)

177 submissions from 171 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 222 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 177 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

144 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 14 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 10.3 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 144Civil society 14Public authorities, academia, other 19

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

100 of 171
in the EU Register
483
full-time lobbying staff
€58.8M+
declared costs a year
291
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 27 May 2026 — it ran from 29 Apr 2026.

Policy area
Industry (DG GROW)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2026

How it got here

  1. Draft implementing regulation27 May 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Implementing regulation.

177 positions · showing 25

ESOP Associação de Empresas de Software Open Source Portuguesas (Business Open Source Portugal) is a non-profit trade association established in 2007, representing providers of products and services and other stakeholders of the Portuguese Open Digital Ecosystem.

LinkedInX
BG

BMW Group

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

The Digital Product Passport (DPP) registry draft implementing act represents a crucial step in defining the core architecture for the trusted digital infrastructure needed to support efficient product markets in the EU.

LinkedInX
BE

Bitkom e. V.

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Bitkom supports the establishment of Digital Product Passports and welcomes the draft implementing regulation on the DPP Registry as an important step towards a functioning European DPP infrastructure. The draft provides a useful basis for implementation, but several aspects require further clarification to ensure legal certainty, cybersecurity, operational resilience and practical scalability for companies.

LinkedInX
R

REFPIN

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

REFPIN welcomes the draft implementing regulation on the Digital Product Passport Registry and refers to its full PDF submission for the detailed feedback. REFPIN supports the creation of a European registry as a robust and well-documented core infrastructure.

LinkedInX
RS

Regen Studio & CircularTech Forum

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Joint Regen Studio × CircularTech Forum submission. The decentralised registry-as-bridge spanning ESPR DAs, batteries, CPR, TSR, DSR is sound. Eleven asks to sharpen specific provisions. 1. Registration API explicit free-of-charge. Art 12(7) makes the semantic repository free; Art 3(b) is silent on the registration API. Make it explicitly free in Art 8 or Art 21 SMEs + non-EU operators need cost-certainty. 2.

LinkedInX
MC

maki Consulting GmbH

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

We welcome the draft Implementing Regulation as a key building block for the DPP system, and particularly its provisions on automatic verification, semantic conformity, versioning, qualified electronic seal, timestamping, and a DPP-version hash. These are essential for a decentralised, modern DPP architecture.

LinkedInX
EC

European Construction Chemicals (ECC)

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

European Construction Chemicals (ECC) suggests suggest to adjust the implementing act to allow for asynchronous uploading or an off-line fallback mode. Manufacturers should be allowed to assign local unique identifiers on the production line and synchronize them to the central EU register later, rather than requiring a life synchronous digital handshake for every single item produced.

LinkedInX
SA

Sika AG

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Sika welcomes the opportunity to submit our feedback regarding the draft Implementing Regulation for the Digital Product Passport (DPP) Registry. Optimizing the operational viability, resilience, and predictability of the DPP registry is crucial for ongoing business activities and supply chain continuity.

LinkedInX
PH

Policy Hub - Circularity for Apparel & Footwear

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

The Policy Hub Circularity for Apparel & Footwear, thanks the European Commission for the opportunity to contribute to the final shape of the implementing act on the establishment of the Digital Product Passport (DPP) Registry.

LinkedInX
TG

4TheRecord GmbH

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

4TheRecord GmbH, a digital product passport consulting company, welcomes the draft Regulation, which represents an important step towards operationalising the Digital Product Passport (DPP) framework and, in doing so, contributes significantly to the transition towards more sustainable products.

LinkedInX
FS

Forum STEM

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Forum STEM is a nationwide science and education initiative bringing together young people, students, experts, academia, business representatives and public-sector stakeholders around the future of science, technology, engineering and innovation.

LinkedInX
TR

Teknikföretagen

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Technology Industries of Sweden welcomes the European Commissions initiative to establish a Digital Product Passport (DPP) Registry as a core element of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). A well-functioning registry is essential for enabling the DPP system in practice.

LinkedInX
SS

Sika Services AG

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Sika welcomes the Regulations objectives but highlights structural criticalities in the proposed architecture: I. REGISTRY FAILURE SHALL NOT BLOCK THE MARKET Products should be able to be placed on the market by Economic operators with compliant DPPs when/if the registry is not available for external disruption or scheduled maintenance. II.

LinkedInX
AA
PDF

ANIVEC, representing the Textile and Clothing Industry (ITV) in Portugal made up mostly of SMEs focused on the nearshoring model, supports the EU’s sustainability and digitalisation goals. However, it warns that the proposed Implementing Regulation has serious shortcomings in customs supervision and imposes a disproportionate technical, economic and legal burden on European businesses, threatening a level playing…

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EB

Enunda BV

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

We recommend that the future Digital Product Passport Registry framework explicitly considers interoperability with existing Union and Member State registry systems that already perform comparable traceability and attribute-accounting functions.

LinkedInX
DE

Dansk Erhverv

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Danish Chamber of Commerce (DCC) welcomes the establishment of the digital product passport (DPP) registry under Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 and as such support the establishment of a functional and secure registry that can facilitate compliance, improve market surveillance, and support a more level playing field across the Single Market.

LinkedInX
ES

European Signature Dialog

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

The European Signature Dialog (ESD) brings together leading companies providing qualified trust services to more than 250 million users across Europe in their everyday digital interactions. ESD promotes secure, trustworthy, and interoperable digital services in line with the highest European standards.

LinkedInX
TI

Toy Industries of Europe (TIE)

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

We are grateful for the opportunity to comment on the draft Implementing Act and have provided feedback in the attached. We hope that the Act can: -Ensure the regulation is properly adapted to the requirements of the Toy Safety Regulation. -Clarify the possibility of the bulk registration of DPPs. -Ensure that access rights for bad actors can be revoked.

LinkedInX
G

GS1

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

GS1 welcomes the European Commissions draft Implementing Act for the Digital Product Passport (DPP) Registry under Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 and appreciates the opportunity to contribute to this consultation. The development of the DPP Registry is an important step towards enabling a harmonised and interoperable framework for the exchange and management of product information across the EU Single Market.

LinkedInX
EC

European Calcium Silicate Producers Association e.V. (ECSPA)

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

The European Calcium Silicate Producers Association (ECSPA) welcomes the draft Implementing Regulation as an important step to also implementing the DPP system for construction products under Regulation (EU) 2024/3110 (CPR) and takes the opportunity to comment via the attached file.

LinkedInX
CC
PDF

CNA identifies some main concerns regarding the draft Regulation on the DPP Registry. The document raises concerns about the long-term availability and lifecycle consistency of DPP data, particularly when economic operators are no longer active or their verification expires. It also highlights the absence of clear technical and operational mechanisms governing backup copies and recovery procedures for DPP data.

LinkedInX
C

Covestro

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

The European Commission's draft implementing regulation for the Digital Product Passport Registry pursues a legitimate and broadly supported objective: establishing a uniform, secure and interoperable system for registering digital product passports across the European single market.

LinkedInX
GS

GODAN SA

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

GODAN S.A. is a medium-sized Polish manufacturer and trading company specialising in balloons, party items and decorations. Our product portfolio covers a wide range of categories, some of which may fall within the scope of EU toy legislation. GODAN S.A. supports the objectives of the proposed framework, such as improved product safety and traceability.

LinkedInX
AD

Avery Dennison

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Avery Dennison welcomes the proposed Implementing Regulation on the Digital Product Passport central registry as a key element of the EUs framework to enable product transparency, traceability and circularity. Establishing a central registry can support interoperability across product groups, facilitate compliance, and strengthen enforcement by providing a common reference point at EU level.

LinkedInX
M

MICHELIN

· · filed 27 May 2026 · source

PDF

Michelin welcomes the draft implementing act establishing the DPP Registry and sets out in the attached file its key observations and suggestions, including aspects requiring clarification, specific considerations for tyres, and related recommendations. Michelin remains available to engage further following this call for evidence in support of an effective implementation of the DPP.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 177 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.