IDnow GmbH, a certified Qualified Trust Service Provider (QTSP) under eIDAS, submits five comments on the draft Implementing Regulation for the DPP Registry. We address: (1) the role of QTSPs in the verification platform; (2) specification of required identification attributes for electronic attestations; (3) interoperability with existing EU systems (EPREL, customs); (4) data protection roles of QTSPs; and (5)…
IDN
IDnow
Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 864046491528-61
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #399 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Bitkom: https://www.bitkom.org/EN
- Bankenverband: https://bankenverband.de/
- Bankenfachverband: https://ssl.bfach.de/
- CEN: https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/normenausschuesse/naw/uebersicht-ueber-die-horizontalen-verknuepfungen-auf-den-e…
- ETSI: https://www.etsi.org/
- FIDO Alliance: https://fidoalliance.org/
- Open Wallet Foundation: https://openwallet.foundation/
- Linux Foundation: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Munich, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track IDnow in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at IDnow? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
IDnow filed 4 positions between 31 Jul 2020 and 11 May 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 1 filed2026 · 3 filed
What they argued
IDnow, a leading European identity verification platform, submits fourteen comments on the EUBW Proposal. We recommend: (1) a binding six-month deadline for all essential Commission implementing acts (Articles 5(5), 9(4), 10(6), 18); (2) a five-year mandatory review clause for the "Business-Wallet-by-Default" principle (Article 15); (3) minimum readiness standards for Member State authentic sources, explicit…
Online fraud is increasingly driven by organised, cross-border criminal networks that industrialise attacks and rapidly adopt new technologies. We observe rising sophistication in document and identity fraud, including GenAI-enabled synthetic documents, deepfakes and injection-type attacks, as well as AI-assisted social engineering that leads to authorised transactions (APP-style scams) which are difficult to…
Hi: thank you for great step forward. Observing various EID schemes so far which the paper categorize them as moderate success but i have to say it has a long way to go to serve its core purpose which is cross border transactions and ease of business.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put IDnow next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 26.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from IDnow’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.