Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
RBG

Robert Bosch GmbH

Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 8999533555-91

27
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
25
legislative files
of 665 tracked
17
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #25 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

12
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€2.3M+
declared costs / yr (floor)
7
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2008
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Die Robert Bosch GmbH ist Mitglied in knapp 400 Vereinen und Verbänden - vom Industrieverband bis zum Jugendherbergsw…
  • AUTOSAR,
  • CLEPA - European Association of Automotive Suppliers,
  • DigitalEurope, →
  • ERTRAC - European Road Transport Research Advisory Council,
  • Hydrogen Europe, →
  • RECHARGE (the advanced rechargeable and lithium batteries association in Europe)
  • VDA - Verband der Automobilindustrie,
  • VDMA - Verband Deutscher Maschinen- und Anlagenbau e.V.
  • ZVEI e.V. - Verband der Elektro- und Digitalindustrie

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Gerlingen-Schillerhoehe, Germany
EU office
Brussels

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Robert in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Robert Bosch GmbH

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Robert Bosch GmbH? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Robert Bosch GmbH filed 27 positions between 11 Feb 2019 and 8 Sept 2026, across 25 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 17 times.

2019 · 2 filed2020 · 3 filed2021 · 5 filed2022 · 3 filed2023 · 2 filed2024 · 2 filed2025 · 3 filed2026 · 7 filed

What they argued

Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materialsfiled 26 Jun 2023source

Bosch highly welcomes that the EU is taking action to secure the supply of critical raw materials for industry. Copper should not be classified as a SRM. It is a base metal that is widely available from different sources and traded on functioning, transparent international markets. Treating Copper as a SRM would lead to a wrong focus of efforts (e.g., for recycling, supply chain stress tests).

Clean corporate vehiclesfiled 8 Sept 2025PDFsource

The Bosch Group, a global technology and automotive supplier, operates a large and diverse corporate fleet of 10,000 vehicles in Germany, mostly leased. Committed to carbon neutrality (achieved in Scope 1 and 2 since 2020) and a 30% CO2 reduction in Scope 3 by 2030, Bosch implements internal policies to increase the share of zero-emission vehicles and carbon-neutral fuels in its fleets, including service vehicles.

Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transportfiled 26 Nov 2020source

An effective and cost-efficient path towards de-fossilization must build on a holistic and consistent mix of policy instruments. The planned revision of the EU Emission Trading System should therefore be closely aligned with the EU Effort Sharing Decision, the EU Tax Directive, the EU’s sectoral policies as well as national mitigation policies in order to avoid excessive regulation and an increase of CO2 abatement…

Data Actfiled 17 Jun 2021source

The Data Act and its roadmap a) Access to Data: Concerning B2B data exchanges, there should be sector specific regulations, but no general obligation to grant access to data. Contractual arrangements should be the preferred option. However, in certain industries such as the automotive sector, sector specific regulation is required in order to ensure fair competition between market participants.

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 25 Sept 2025PDFsource

(i) Accurately and consistently recognizing third-country CO2 prices remains a key CBAM challenge. To avoid double-counting and uphold environmental integrity, the EU must establish clear, internationally coordinated rules, including formal verification and data-sharing agreements with carbon-pricing third countries, thereby fostering global CO2 pricing alignment.

Fluorinated gases regulationfiled 28 Jun 2022PDFsource

We fully support the Paris climate agreement to the intermediate REPowerEU and 2030/2050 climate targets as part of the European Green Deal objectives. We also broadly welcome the Commission proposal of a revised F-Gas Regulation.

Chips Act 2.0filed 2 Sept 2026PDFsource

To achieve genuine technological leadership and supply chain resilience, the Chips Act 2.0 proposal now pivots from a supply-side focus to a proactive, market-driven industrial policy approach. The new proposal introduces a welcomed mix of supply- and demand-side instruments and approaches, which effectiveness will be determined by means of implementation.

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure on the draft Commission Implementing Regulation laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and the Council as regards the methods for the calculation of emissions embedded in goodsfiled 25 Sept 2025PDFsource

(i) The current CBAM emission calculation using primary data is overly complex and burdensome. Supplier data acquisition remains a major hurdle, as data (e.g. on installations, processes, emissions location) is often unavailable or difficult to obtain. Many suppliers may be unable or unwilling to provide this kind of information.

CO2 emission standards for cars and vansfiled 26 Nov 2020source

A tightening of the CO2 standards for cars and vans only two years after the last revision of the regulation would significantly increase planning uncertainty and add to the already high transformation pressure of the automotive industry.

Digital Product Passport Registry (DPP)filed 27 May 2026PDFsource

Bosch welcomes the opportunity to comment on the draft Implementing Act (IA) laying down the implementation arrangements for the digital product passport registry set up under Regulation (EU) 2024/1781. Given that the Digital Battery Passport (DBP) established under Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 will likely be the first Digital Product Passport (DPP) to utilise this registry, we offer our comments from the…

Digital Product Passport (DPP) service providersfiled 10 Dec 2024PDFsource

- The delegated act is welcomed as further clarity on the role of digital product passport service providers (DPPSP) is needed for legal certainty of affected economic operators. Requirements set out in Art. 10 and Art. 27 of the ESPR must be unambiguously speci-fied through secondary legislation to warrant harmonized implementation in the Internal Market.

A water resilience research and innovation strategyfiled 7 Jul 2026PDFsource

Bosch, a steadfast proponent of a resilient, competitive, and transformative European economy, welcomes the European Commission's initiative to outline an ambitious water resilience research and innovation strategy. Building on our vision for a green and sustainable Europe, Bosch would like to highlight following recommendations (see attachment) as means to guide the outlined aims and elements of the initiative.

Regulation on machinery productsfiled 6 Aug 2021PDFsource

The EU Machinery Directive is of high importance to the EU Bicycle Industry and therefore also for Bosch eBike Systems, as it legislates the essential health and safety requirements relating to the design and construction of electrically power assisted cycles (EPACs). We have a long standing, good experience with the Machinery Directive to ensure the safety of our products.

Regulation on machinery productsfiled 11 Feb 2019PDFsource

Robert Bosch answer to the European Commission Inception Impact Assessment on the Revision of the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Bosch does not favour Options 0, 1 and 3. The Machinery Directive has to be adapted at least to the New Legislative Framework, especially with the provisions of Decision 768/2008, and need adjustments for clarification in the scope, definitions and content with respect to legal clarity.

Revision of the Network Code on Requirements for Grid Connection of Generatorsfiled 25 Aug 2026PDFsource

Public consultation NC RfG (August 2026) Paragraph Amendment Proposal Reasoning Relation to other provisions Article 52 - Common provisions on equipment certificates 3 Problem: Conflict with Annex III article 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, Annex III article 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 The Annex III / 2 is defining scope of applicability of the family for V2G EV Proposal 1: Modify Text: "The scope of applicability of the PGU family and component…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Strengthening the CO2 emission performance targets for new heavy-duty vehiclesfiled 14 Mar 2022PDFsource

Bosch supports stringent CO2 reduction targets for Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDV) to contribute to the objective of the EU to reduce its overall CO2 emissions by 55% by 2030 and to become climate neutral by 2050. By setting targets for HDV, potentials of cost-efficient CO2 reductions, technology availability and lead times as well as freight transport specific requirements to ensure reliable logistic chains over long…

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 28 May 2024PDFsource

Bosch welcomes the publication of the draft delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation and verification of the carbon footprint of electric vehicle batteries. We believe the methodology should be as robust and as harmonised with existing standards as possible.

General Product Safety Regulationfiled 24 Sept 2021source

The comments of the Robert Bosch GmbH are not exhaustive. They give an overview with regard to some matters that are of particular interest to our company. 1. On the matter of mental health The context and the added value of the WHO definition of ‘health’ for the GPSR is unclear.

Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions of transport servicesfiled 10 Dec 2021source

Bosch welcomes the COM initiative to provide a uniform framework for quantifying GHG emissions in the transport sector. The goal to promote new business models and to initiate a strong dynamic in the reduction of CO2 emissions in the transport sector is also supported form our part.

Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7)filed 9 Feb 2023PDFsource

Bosch supports Euro 7/VII as the last regulatory step for exhaust emissions. Euro 7/VII standards can further reduce the impact of new vehicles (and beyond 2035 for vehicles in use) on air quality. Given the rapidly growing share of electric vehicles, it is reasonable to also set limit values for particle emissions from brakes and tyres. Nevertheless, a monitoring period is advisable to test new measurement methods.

Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7)filed 21 Apr 2020source

Bosch welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the development of new emission standards. The impact of road traffic on air quality needs to decrease further. Since the internal combustion engine will remain an important part of the future powertrain mix beyond 2030, new emission standards need to reflect technological progress while ensuring competitiveness of the European automotive industry.

Liability for defective productsfiled 15 Jul 2021source

A. Product Liability Directive – Should the EU product liability regime be revised as a consequence of AI related technological developments The liability of the producer of a product As Bosch, we urge to consider carefully, whether the Product Liability Directive (PLD) needs revision as a consequence of technological developments such as AI.

Batteries – definition of labelling requirementsfiled 23 Jan 2026PDFsource

Please find attached the expert opinion of Robert Bosch GmbH on the draft Implementing Act on Articles 7 and 13 of the Batteries Regulation. The Bosch group manufactures batteries falling within various of the battery categories of the Batteries Regulation and also produces battery-operated electrical and electronic equipment. Therefore, the Bosch group is directly affected by the draft Implementing Act.

Methodology for calculation and verification of recycled content in batteriesfiled 8 Sept 2026PDFsource

Bosch strongly supports the transition to a circular economy and particularly welcomes the European Commissions decision to adopt a flexible, credit-based mass balance system on an operational level for recycled content. Discarding impractical physical segregation models is a crucial step to safeguard the operational viability of continuous industrial manufacturing.

Chips Actfiled 6 May 2022source

Bosch welcomes the EU Chips Act and its ambitious target of increasing Europe’s share of global chips manufacturing to 20% by 2030 as well as its contribution to the success of the twin transition of the European industry, which relies on an innovative and resilient supply of mature and advanced chips for future growth.

European Partnership for Safe and Automated Road Transportfiled 27 Aug 2019source

Robert Bosch GmbH highly appreciates the preparation of a new European R&I partnership for Safe and Automated Road Transport by the European Commission - in close collaboration with the Member states - as a priority in the strategic planning for Horizon Europe.

Methods, tests and administrative requirements for type-approval of brake particle emissions of M1 and N1 vehiclesfiled 24 Jun 2026PDFsource

The Bosch Group, a supplier of a comprehensive portfolio of braking components to the independent aftermarket, supports the objective of establishing a harmonized framework for measuring and mitigating brake particle emissions. To ensure a smooth transition to Euro 7 standards by 29 November 2026, establishing a workable regulatory framework specific to the aftermarket is vital.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Robert Bosch GmbH next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 462.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Robert Bosch GmbH’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.