Aura supports the establishment of a Commission-managed DPP Registry as a key enabler of trusted, traceable and enforceable Digital Product Passports. For the Registry to be successful, it should be technically scalable, legally clear and operationally workable for economic operators and their DPP service providers.
ABC
Aura Blockchain Consortium
Other · Switzerland · EU Transparency Register 034467693444-45
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 145 other organisations on this site, they rank #61 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.9
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Aura's Steering members are LVMH
- Prada Group
- Richemont and OTB Group
- Aura has more than 50 member luxury brands including the ones listed on our website
- https://auraconsortium.com/members
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Other organisations
- Registered as
- Aura blockchain consortium (AURA)
- Head office
- Geneva, Switzerland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Aura in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Aura Blockchain Consortium? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Aura Blockchain Consortium filed 2 positions between 10 Dec 2024 and 27 May 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2024 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
The Aura Blockchain Consortium (Aura) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Commissions Call for Evidence. Companies face uncertainty due to the nascent nature of the Digital Product Passport (DPP) service providers market, marked by a diversity of actors varying in (i) structural and operational characteristics (size, technological capabilities, information security) and (ii) organizational nature.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EuroCommerce · 2 files in common
- FEAD - European Waste Management Association · 2 files in common
- ACEA · 2 files in common
- BASF SE · 2 files in common
- TÜV-Verband e. V. · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 17.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Aura Blockchain Consortium’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.