P&G supports the Digital Product Passport (DPP) as a practical tool to digitize product information requirements, improve transparency for value-chain actors, and simplify compliance for companies. To keep the DPP registry simple-by-design and workable for high-volume sectors, while avoiding unnecessary costs, we recommend the following: 1.
Procter & Gamble
Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 5519077766-10
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #341 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- AIM - European Brands Association (www.aim.be/)
- AESGP - European Self-Medication Industry (www.aesgp.eu)
- AMCHAM EU (www.amchameu.eu)
- AISE - Association for Soaps, Detergents and Maintenance Products (www.aise.eu)
- AECA - The American European Community Association (www.aeca.org)
- AIM - European Brands Association (www.aim.be/)
- AESGP - European Self-Medication Industry (www.aesgp.eu)
- AMCHAM EU (www.amchameu.eu)
- AISE - Association for Soaps, Detergents and Maintenance Products (www.aise.eu)
- AECA - The American European Community Association (www.aeca.org)
- APPLIA – Home Appliance Europe (https://www.applia-europe.eu/ )
- Business Europe (www.businesseurope.eu)
- and 10 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Cincinnati, United states
- EU office
- Strombeek-Bever
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Procter in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Procter & Gamble? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Procter & Gamble filed 5 positions between 8 Sept 2021 and 10 Sept 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The sustainability assessment and resulting key criteria for plastic recycling technologies should be technology neutral, so as to permit (rather than hinder) innovation in support of a circular plastics economy. This requires a focus on objective and transparent indicators of performance rather than an a priori preference for a specific technology per se.
We welcome the legal certainty provided by the harmonisation of rules for the calculation and verification of recycled content in plastic packaging. This is essential for the Single Market in packaged goods. Divergent national approaches would create additional administrative burdens that distort competition and result in uncertainty throughout the value chain.
Article 7(3) explicitly permits the use of recycled content from third-countries subject to the specific conditions mandated in Article 7(10). As a consequence, the Implementing Act should strive to be fundamentally permissive in nature, rather than a construct that effectively prohibits international trade in post-consumer recyclate.
Article 1 of Directive 92/106/EE ‘on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States’ established constraints on the initial or final road leg combined transport operations.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Procter & Gamble next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 116.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Procter & Gamble’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.