Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 092713747707-65
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #311 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Ravensburger in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Ravensburger Verlag GmbH? so we know who speaks for it.
Ravensburger Verlag GmbH filed 3 positions between 20 Jan 2026 and 3 Jun 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
Article 4(4) Dual periods of validity are mentioned here. Either until the expiry of the electronic identification means or up to 3 years after the date of verification. This means that companies always have to monitor two points in time, which is a disproportionate effort. Please request only a period of time, e.g. until the expiry of the electronic identification means under Article 7(3) and (4).
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
With regard to Article 1(2), if a battery is too small (which will apply to most portable batteries, e.g. AA batteries or AAA batteries) to display all the information there and this information may then be displayed on the packaging, why must this information be added to the accompanying documents (e.g. instructions)? Why does it mean and not or?
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Toys are a product category adjacent to childcare articles and there are products that are sometimes in a grey area of the two categories. It is therefore essential to clarify that toys are excluded from the scope of this regulation or that this regulation does not apply to toys.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 16.
Everything on this page comes from Ravensburger Verlag GmbH’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.