Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
RVG

Ravensburger Verlag GmbH

Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 092713747707-65

6
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #299 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • https://www.toyindustries.eu/
  • https://www.amfori.org/content/amfori-bsci
  • https://www.dvsi.de/
  • https://www.sedex.com/
  • https://www.din.de/de
  • https://www.cencenelec.eu/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Ravensburg, Germany

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Ravensburger in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Ravensburger Verlag GmbH

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Ravensburger Verlag GmbH? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Ravensburger Verlag GmbH filed 6 positions between 20 Jan 2026 and 12 Oct 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Implementing rules on registering in and reporting to the register of producersfiled 1 Sept 2026source

Ravensburger stands behind the PPWR as it stands for sustainability. Nevertheless, the PPWR prevents the free movement of goods within the EU and prevents the company from entering new markets within the EU. In order to enter new markets and test the outlet, we start this market with the smallest shipments.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Digital Product Passport Registry (DPP)filed 27 May 2026source

Article 4(4) Dual periods of validity are mentioned here. Either until the expiry of the electronic identification means or up to 3 years after the date of verification. This means that companies always have to monitor two points in time, which is a disproportionate effort. Please request only a period of time, e.g. until the expiry of the electronic identification means under Article 7(3) and (4).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Batteries – definition of labelling requirementsfiled 20 Jan 2026source

With regard to Article 1(2), if a battery is too small (which will apply to most portable batteries, e.g. AA batteries or AAA batteries) to display all the information there and this information may then be displayed on the packaging, why must this information be added to the accompanying documents (e.g. instructions)? Why does it mean and not or?

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Restriction on CMRs in childcare articlesfiled 3 Jun 2026source

Toys are a product category adjacent to childcare articles and there are products that are sometimes in a grey area of the two categories. It is therefore essential to clarify that toys are excluded from the scope of this regulation or that this regulation does not apply to toys.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Amendment of the Toy Safety Directive - Lilial, BPA, phenol and BITfiled 12 Oct 2026source

We would like to express our substantial concerns regarding the proposed BPA migration limit of 0.005 mg/L. Establishing the limit of quantification (LOQ) as the legally binding compliance threshold raises fundamental issues related to analytical capability, measurement uncertainty and the provision of adequate legal certainty for economic operators.

Amendment of the Toy Safety Directive - Lilial, BPA, phenol and BITfiled 8 Oct 2026source

We have significant concerns regarding the proposed BPA migration limit of 0.005mg/l. The use of the LOQ as the legal compliance limit raises important questions regarding analytical reliability, measurement uncertainty, and legal certainty for manufacturers.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Ravensburger Verlag GmbH next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 35.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Ravensburger Verlag GmbH’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.