We welcome the draft Implementing Regulation as a key building block for the DPP system, and particularly its provisions on automatic verification, semantic conformity, versioning, qualified electronic seal, timestamping, and a DPP-version hash. These are essential for a decentralised, modern DPP architecture.
MCG
maki Consulting GmbH
Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 687190237996-89
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #297 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Kolbermoor, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track maki in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at maki Consulting GmbH? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
maki Consulting GmbH filed 3 positions between 28 May 2024 and 12 Aug 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2024 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
maki Consulting welcomes the publication of the draft Delegated Regulation establishing the methodology for the calculation and verification of the carbon footprint of electric vehicle batteries. We believe the methodology and data basis should be as robust as possible, ensuring valid comparisons. It should moreover incentivise companies to achieve best-in class, improving their products, including at suppliers.
maki Consulting GmbH welcomes the initiative and the substantial technical work undertaken for the future Delegated Act on intermediate iron and steel products. The attached evidence focuses on methodological and policy-design choices that should be tested in the Impact Assessment before the regulatory architecture is fixed.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- ECOS · 3 files in common
- BASF SE · 3 files in common
- Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. · 3 files in common
- BMW Group · 3 files in common
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 21.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from maki Consulting GmbH’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.