Technology Industries of Sweden welcomes the European Commissions initiative to establish a Digital Product Passport (DPP) Registry as a core element of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). A well-functioning registry is essential for enabling the DPP system in practice.
Teknikföretagen
Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 257226411720-38
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #431 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Svenskt Näringsliv
- Orgalim →
- Digital Europe →
- Ceemet
- EFFRA
- Manufuture
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Stockholm, Sweden
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Teknikföretagen in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Teknikföretagen? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Teknikföretagen filed 4 positions between 15 Jan 2024 and 27 May 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Technology Industries of Sweden (Teknikföretagen), the primary representative for Swedish industry 1. supports the objective of the Advanced Materials Act to strengthen Europes capacity to innovate, produce, and deploy advanced materials. 2.
Call for evidence on Mutual recognition of goods Feedback from Teknikföretagen (The Association of Swedish Engineering Industries) In relation to the open call on Mutual recognition of goods - evaluation of Regulation (EU) 2019/515, Teknikföretagen would like to submit the following feedback.
In Teknikföretagens view both PED and SPVD function well, and the technical requirements are well-established. Therefore, we propose that the technical requirements remain unchanged in the event of a revision. We do however see benefits with better alignment of legal requirements with other product regulations, such as introducing digital product passports for relevant data.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EuroCommerce · 2 files in common
- FEAD - European Waste Management Association · 2 files in common
- German Association of Biotechnology Industries (DIB) within the German Chemical Industry Association - VCI · 2 files in common
- BASF SE · 2 files in common
- Glass for Europe · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 11.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Teknikföretagen’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.