LightingEurope takes this public consultation as an opportunity to share some preliminary remarks and questions for the consideration of the European Commission ahead of the drafting of the proposal for a Regulation. LightingEurope makes general remarks on the following issues in its detailed paper attached to this consultation: 1. Proliferation of information requirements 2.
LIG
LightingEurope
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 29789243712-03
9
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
9
legislative files
of 326 tracked
8
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #160 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
5
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2010
in the register since
Declares membership of
- EucoLight →
- Global Lighting Association
- CEN CENELEC
- PEP Association
- Coalition for Energy Savings
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track LightingEurope in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at LightingEurope? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
LightingEurope filed 9 positions between 31 Aug 2020 and 26 May 2026, across 9 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
2020 · 1 filed2025 · 4 filed2026 · 4 filed
What they argued
The European lighting industry strongly supports the proposed changes to Section 3.5 of the Climate Delegated Act, where the subsection Technical screening criteria now explicitly includes controllable luminaires with LED-based light source for indoor lighting or architectural lighting under letter (g).
LightingEurope supports the Commissions overarching goal of reducing unnecessary administrative burdens, but we believe the proposal must be refined to ensure it delivers tangible relief for the EEE sectors without compromising market enforcement. Our detailed views and specific amendment requests are contained in the attached position paper.
LightingEurope welcomes the publication of the draft Digital Product Passport Registry Implementing Regulation as it marks a significant step in the implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for sustainable products (ESPR).
Dear Sir or Madam, please find LightingEuorpe's response to the public consultation on the energy efficiency legal framework after 2030 enclosed. LightingEurope remains available for all future questions. Many thanks in advance for your considerations. LightingEurope is the voice of the lighting industry, based in Brussels and representing 31 companies and national associations.
Brussels, 02 September 2025 LightingEurope Position on the Omnibus IV proposal for a Directive and a Regulation as regards the digitalisation and alignment of common specifications Introduction The following input presents LightingEurope’s position to the recent European Commission’s (EC) proposal for a Directive and a Regulation as regards the digitalization and alignment of common specifications.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Brussels, 02 September 2025 LightingEurope Position on the Omnibus IV proposal for a Directive and a Regulation as regards the digitalisation and alignment of common specifications Introduction The following input presents LightingEurope’s position to the recent European Commission’s (EC) proposal for a Directive and a Regulation as regards the digitalization and alignment of common specifications.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
LightingEurope welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to this consultation. We support the deferred application date of the Implementing Act, as well as the flexibility granted to companies regarding the format to be used during the transitional period. However, we believe that the final Implementing Act should include improvements concerning verification.
We thank the European Commission for this opportunity to provide our feedback to an essential Implementing Regulation of the CRA. LightingEurope would like to request clarification regarding the classification of 10. Physical and virtual network interfaces under Class I (Important Products) in Annex I of the draft Implementing Regulation on product categories for the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EuroCommerce · 7 files in common
- Danish Industry · 6 files in common
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 6 files in common
- ZVEI e.V. · 6 files in common
- Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 206.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from LightingEurope’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.