Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Digital Fitness Check

129 submissions from 128 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 293 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 129 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

93 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 20 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 4.7 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 93Civil society 20Public authorities, academia, other 16

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

89 of 128
in the EU Register
520
full-time lobbying staff
€74.9M+
declared costs a year
400
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 11 Mar 2026 — it ran from 19 Nov 2025.

Policy area
Digital & tech (DG CNECT)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2027 · in 213 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · evaluation11 Mar 2026
  2. Public consultation11 Mar 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Communication.

129 positions · showing 25

EC

European Crypto Initiative

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

Response to the European Commissions call for evidence on the Digital Fitness Check We welcome the Commissions Digital Fitness Check and its stated objective of ensuring that the EU digital rulebook remains coherent, proportionate, innovation-friendly, and supportive of competitiveness.

LinkedInX
AO

Alum of Cambridge University

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Digital Fitness Check brings good opportunity for the review, simplification and re-design where needed- the structure of the digital rules. Instead of bringing new requirements it is important to reflect over the existing AI rulebook so as to streamline underling legislation and adhere to the needs of the industry and all its participants.

LinkedInX

I am happy to be responding on behalf of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), in its capacity as administrator of the Knowledge Rights 21 Programme (KR21). KR21 works to ensure that the needs, experience and priorities of libraries and their users are reflected in decision-making around knowledge and digital law.

LinkedInX
AO

Association of Netherlands Municipalities

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The Dutch municipalities welcome the evaluation of the Digital Rulebook and its fitness for purpose. Over the past few years, the legislative acquis on digitalisation has grown significantly. Dutch local authorities have built up lots of expertise when it comes to putting the digital regulatory framework into practice.

LinkedInX
C

Circularise

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

As a European technology company developing digital infrastructures for traceability and compliance across supply chains, Circularise operates at the intersection of several EU digital and sectoral regulatory frameworks. Our contribution highlights the strategic role of digital infrastructures - including Digital Product Passports - in translating regulatory data requirements into scalable and interoperable systems.

LinkedInX
SS

SAP SE

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

As a global leader in enterprise applications and business AI, SAP SE enjoys the specific perspective of a European innovation company, active for over 50 years and present on five continents. Having supported and accompanied European companies and public bodies in their digitization, we want to offer our insights on the regulatory framework and the rightful effort to simplify and streamline it.

LinkedInX
KI

Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza (Polish Chamber of Commerce)

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

The National Chamber of Commerce, an independent organisation of economic self-government in Poland, bringing together more than 170 regional, sectoral and bilateral chambers and other economic actors, has been actively supporting the development of the digital economy for many years.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
LS

Lionheart Squared (Europe) Ltd

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

SUBMISSION REGARDING COM(2025) 837 FINAL: Addressing the actuarial failure of the statutory EU representative model As a Statutory EU Representative (EU Transparency Register: 3190771102741-15), I provide this critical update to the reality checks (p. 14) and fundamental rights assessments (p. 15) described in the Digital Omnibus. 1.

LinkedInX
M

Microsoft

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Microsoft welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Digital Fitness Check call for evidence. The current EU digital rulebook has been instrumental in establishing the core pillars of a Digital Single Market.

LinkedInX
AI

appliedAI Institute for Europe

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The appliedAI Institute for Europe is a non-profit company, based in Germany, with the goal to foster trustworthy AI Innovation at scale, by providing educational, technical and community-related offerings with a focus on Startups, SMEs and the public sector. We aim to shape the AI Act and secondary legislation with the stance of empowering small-scale AI Innovators and Governance bodies alike.

LinkedInX
DP

Digital Poland Association

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

We welcome the opportunity to contribute to the Digital Fitness Check consultation and fully support the European Commissions ambitious goals to bolster Europes economic competitiveness. As the continent looks to capitalize on the AI revolution, we believe that regulatory simplification and coherence should be treated as strategic priorities.

LinkedInX
DE

Danish Entrepreneurs

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The EU has adopted an extensive set of digital regulations in recent years, including the AI Act, Data Act, Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act and the NIS2 Directive. While these initiatives pursue legitimate goals such as user protection, fair competition and cybersecurity, their combined impact creates a growing regulatory burden for startups and scale-ups.

LinkedInX
CM

Check My Ads

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Check My Ads welcomes the European Commissions effort to simplify the EU digital rulebook while strengthening Europes competitiveness in the digital economy. Online advertising is the central revenue stream of the modern internet, yet the ecosystem's governance has largely been delegated to industry-led bodies, creating conflicts of interest, opacity, and weak enforcement.

LinkedInX
CL

Civil Liberties Union for Europe

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Liberties welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the Digital Fitness Check Communication. However, it is unfortunate that this opportunity only comes after the digital omnibus proposals were launched in November 2025.

LinkedInX
CF

Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL)

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

CIPL welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the Digital Fitness Check and submits its attached paper, CIPLs Big Ideas for Simplification of Europes Digital Rulebook, as a practical contribution to this exercise. The paper draws on CIPLs extensive work on the practical implementation of the EU digital rulebook and is directly relevant to the issues identified in this call for evidence.

LinkedInX
SE

Sdružení pro internetový rozvoj

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

SPIR welcomes the Commission's intention to simplify the EU's digital rules, ensuring they are effective and proportionate. Many of the current EU digital norms were adopted relatively recently, and together they provide a robust and complex regulatory environment.

LinkedInX
AC

AI Chamber

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

The Digital Fitness Check should focus on the cumulative cost of compliance, not on single acts in isolation. The core problem for European businesses is the overlap of obligations under GDPR, the AI Act, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and sector-specific regimes.

LinkedInX
BT

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

BEUC welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Digital Fitness Check. From a consumer perspective, the EU digital rulebook is a fundamental framework to address structural problems in digital markets. Instruments such as the DSA, DMA, GDPR and AI Act have begun to tackle long-standing issues including opaque platform practices, excessive data collection, harmful commercial strategies and the concentration of…

LinkedInX
RA

Rockwell Automation

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Rockwell Automation appreciates the opportunity to share our perspective on the Digital Fitness Check. In addition to our detailed consultation input, we would like to share the attached document, which highlights an implementation issue within the CRA regarding the scope of the spare parts exemption in Article 2(6).

LinkedInX
EB

European Banking Federation

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions simplification initiative under the Digital Fitness Check. In the attached document, we conducted an examination of 11 legal acts, identifying interplays, overlaps and priority areas for the financial sector where simplification, better coordination and effective enforcement are needed, with the objective of…

LinkedInX
FP

Freshfields PartG mbB

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

1. Reaffirming fundamental principles of Article 82 GDPR The European Commissions Digital Fitness Check should reaffirm the fundamental principle that compensation under Art.82 GDPR requires demonstrated, actual harm and a proven causal link to an infringement.

LinkedInX
BE

Bundesverband E-Commerce und Versandhandel Deutschland e.V.

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The European digital legal framework has evolved steadily in recent years. Harmonising key rules has helped facilitate cross-border online trade and boosted consumer trust in digital offers. At the same time, practical implementation shows that the Digital Single Market is not yet complete. For example, there are some inconsistencies between different legal acts.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

Please find attached the "Oslo Submission on the Digital Omnibus and the Digital Fitness Check". It is based on academic discussions held in Oslo between December 2025 and March 2026 among legal scholars specialising in data protection, digital regulation and technology law from the University of Oslo, BI Norwegian Business School, the University of Bergen, and Oslo Metropolitan University.

LinkedInX
BG

BIV (German Workshops Association)

· · filed 11 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Suggestion of a Digital Meta-Legislation to upgrade proven existing legal frameworks, reducing the number of acts in total and eliminate any manual reporting effort for affected parties. The Bundesinnungsverband represents the car workshops in Germany, where the impact of the technical evolution in the field of Digitalisation for an increasingly connected and autonomous vehicle, digital services and digitized parts…

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 129 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.