HOPE welcomes the proposed revision that aims to simplify the EU regulatory framework, reduce unnecessary administrative burden and support timely access to products. However, those efforts should not weaken the patient protection. The proposed revision of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) concerning artificial intelligence in Recital 23 and in article 4 of should be deleted.
HOPE (EUROPEAN HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FEDERATION)
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 73872883198-91
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #37 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- European Medicines Verification Organisation: https://emvo-medicines.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE)
- Head office
- Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track HOPE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at HOPE (EUROPEAN HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FEDERATION)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
HOPE (EUROPEAN HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FEDERATION) filed 11 positions between 19 Jun 2025 and 27 Jul 2026, across 9 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The core aim of the revision of the Public Procurement directives should be to reducing the administrative burden by simplifying the current rules. HOPE advocates for clear and simple rules with a reduction in the level of detail and greater reliance upon the general principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination. 1.
HOPE welcomes the CSA2 proposal in light of a changed cybersecurity threat landscape, with new threats and uncertain future developments faced by hospitals and health services. A flexible, needs-focused, horizontal cybersecurity framework is important at a time when AI-enabled automated attacks and social engineering, refocused ransomware attacks (including state-sponsored) and advances in quantum computing are…
HOPE acknowledges the proposal for a Directive amending Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) as regards simplification measures and alignment with the proposal for the Cybersecurity Act 2. The delays experienced in the national NIS2 transposition demonstrated that its implementation is challenging, including in the hospital sector where financial, human, and operational resources are insufficient for adapting to…
Given the continuously evolving nature of cyber-threats affecting the hospital and healthcare sector, HOPE is generally in favour of targeted European coordination and measures that improve resilience, lend support national, regional and institutional stakeholders cybersecurity actions, and enhance the protection of fundamental rights.
HOPE welcomes the publication of the draft Commission guidance on the application of the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) as an indispensable reference document addressed to economic operators and supporting the activities of market surveillance authorities, notifying authorities and notified bodies.
The European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE), representing national hospital associations and healthcare providers across Europe, welcomes the European Commissions initiative to prepare a legislative proposal for an ERA Act. Hospitals, as key actors in Europes research and innovation ecosystem, are directly concerned by this process..
HOPE thinks that great care must be taken that simplification measures, primarily requested by technology companies to reduce administrative and cost burdens, do not generate detrimental effects (privacy, liability, safety, security, uncertainty) for the institutions and individuals charged with overseeing and using advanced digital tools in healthcare, including hospital staff, healthcare workers, and patients.
HOPE agrees with the Commission that the rise in foundational AI technologies and associated threats affecting critical sectors, including cyber-attacks, disinformation, algorithmic manipulation and deep fakes, coupled with geopolitical uncertainties, are serious developments that must be considered in the Digital Decade Policy Programme (DDPP).
HOPE welcomes the Commissions commitment to enhance labour mobility. However, there are already a wide range of tools in place at EU-level, to build on in an appropriate way, with full respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. In this context, voluntary adoption, real-world testing with employers, and interoperability with national systems must guide all EU-level initiatives.
HOPE appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft Implementing Regulation setting out measures on the establishment and operations of the EHDS Board. Recognising its key function as a forum for cooperation and exchange of information between the Member States and the Commission, HOPE backs its swift inception to steer the EHDS implementation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 6 files in common
- DIGITALEUROPE · 5 files in common
- MedTech Europe · 5 files in common
- Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · 4 files in common
- Bitkom e.V. · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 167.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from HOPE (EUROPEAN HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FEDERATION)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.