Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EHH

European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE)

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 73872883198-91

17
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
14
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #60 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.9
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2010
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • European Medicines Verification Organisation: https://emvo-medicines.eu/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE)
Head office
Bruxelles, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE)

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE)? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE) filed 17 positions between 14 Dec 2020 and 27 Jul 2026, across 14 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2020 · 1 filed2021 · 2 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 2 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 9 filed

What they argued

Public Procurement Actfiled 26 Jan 2026source

The core aim of the revision of the Public Procurement directives should be to reducing the administrative burden by simplifying the current rules. HOPE advocates for clear and simple rules with a reduction in the level of detail and greater reliance upon the general principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination. 1.

Simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and the list of Union harmonisation legislationfiled 27 Jul 2026PDFsource

HOPE welcomes the proposed revision that aims to simplify the EU regulatory framework, reduce unnecessary administrative burden and support timely access to products. However, those efforts should not weaken the patient protection. The proposed revision of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) concerning artificial intelligence in Recital 23 and in article 4 of should be deleted.

Artificial Intelligence Actfiled 12 Jul 2021PDFsource

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a complex phenomenon interfering with the way medical research is conducted, the biomedical data is used, and the healthcare professions and organisations are regulated. AI use in healthcare would then also requires a specific regulatory approach, in addition to a strong horizontal cross-sector regulation of AI.

Amending the NIS 2 Directive as regards simplification measures and alignment with the Cybersecurity Act 2filed 12 May 2026source

HOPE welcomes the CSA2 proposal in light of a changed cybersecurity threat landscape, with new threats and uncertain future developments faced by hospitals and health services. A flexible, needs-focused, horizontal cybersecurity framework is important at a time when AI-enabled automated attacks and social engineering, refocused ransomware attacks (including state-sponsored) and advances in quantum computing are…

Amending the NIS 2 Directive as regards simplification measures and alignment with the Cybersecurity Act 2filed 12 May 2026source

HOPE acknowledges the proposal for a Directive amending Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) as regards simplification measures and alignment with the proposal for the Cybersecurity Act 2. The delays experienced in the national NIS2 transposition demonstrated that its implementation is challenging, including in the hospital sector where financial, human, and operational resources are insufficient for adapting to…

European Health Data Spacefiled 19 Jul 2022source

The European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE) welcomes the EHDS legislative proposal and its key objectives as a logical next step in the digital transformation of health and care. However, based on our preliminary analysis, a number of legal and technical clarifications will be required - in particular regarding some of the terminologies, operational requirements and standards, and links with other…

European Health Data Spacefiled 2 Feb 2021source

HOPE welcomes this Roadmap as an opportunity to further clarify certain elements in particular as the Commission mentions its priority to reduce inequalities, which are particular important in terms of digital access and digital literacy. Specificities should be recognized instead of being ignored with a one-fits-all approach.

Cyber Resilience Actfiled 10 Jan 2023source

We understand that the proposed Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) Regulation has a horizontal reach and therefore it could be pertinent to various digital networks, IT systems, and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions commonly deployed in hospitals and healthcare environments not covered by other EU legislation.

Standards of quality and safety for substances of human origin intended for human applicationfiled 14 Dec 2020source

The legislation on blood and all blood components should stay within the public health framework irrespective of the end use of the project. Blood is not a commodity. We were surprised to read in the roadmap that blood establishments and competent authorities did not know or anticipate the supply and demand in blood an blood products during the Covid-19 crisis. We do not find evidence of this.

Draft Commission guidance on the Cyber Resilience Actfiled 13 Apr 2026source

HOPE welcomes the publication of the draft Commission guidance on the application of the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) as an indispensable reference document addressed to economic operators and supporting the activities of market surveillance authorities, notifying authorities and notified bodies.

European Research Area (ERA) Actfiled 8 Sept 2025source

The European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE), representing national hospital associations and healthcare providers across Europe, welcomes the European Commissions initiative to prepare a legislative proposal for an ERA Act. Hospitals, as key actors in Europes research and innovation ecosystem, are directly concerned by this process..

Digital Fitness Checkfiled 25 Feb 2026source

HOPE thinks that great care must be taken that simplification measures, primarily requested by technology companies to reduce administrative and cost burdens, do not generate detrimental effects (privacy, liability, safety, security, uncertainty) for the institutions and individuals charged with overseeing and using advanced digital tools in healthcare, including hospital staff, healthcare workers, and patients.

Commercial transactions: combating late paymentfiled 7 Feb 2023source

The elements of the Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions are more then ever relevant after the consequences of the economic and financial crisis and the COVID19 crisis. The situation of health services in a large number of Member States is still a particular cause for concern in connection with late payment is.

Report on the review of the Digital Decade Policy Programmefiled 5 Jan 2026source

HOPE agrees with the Commission that the rise in foundational AI technologies and associated threats affecting critical sectors, including cyber-attacks, disinformation, algorithmic manipulation and deep fakes, coupled with geopolitical uncertainties, are serious developments that must be considered in the Digital Decade Policy Programme (DDPP).

Fair labour mobility packagefiled 2 Feb 2026source

HOPE welcomes the Commissions commitment to enhance labour mobility. However, there are already a wide range of tools in place at EU-level, to build on in an appropriate way, with full respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. In this context, voluntary adoption, real-world testing with employers, and interoperability with national systems must guide all EU-level initiatives.

European Health Data Space Board operationsfiled 5 Jan 2026source

HOPE appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft Implementing Regulation setting out measures on the establishment and operations of the EHDS Board. Recognising its key function as a forum for cooperation and exchange of information between the Member States and the Commission, HOPE backs its swift inception to steer the EHDS implementation.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 323.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.