Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
TP

Techno Polis

Company · Italy

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Techno in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Techno Polis? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Techno Polis engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Techno Polis or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Techno Polis filed 2 positions between 8 Jan 2026 and 9 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Digital Fitness Checkfiled 9 Mar 2026source

Effective regulation must accurately reflect the underlying technological architecture it seeks to govern; laws that rely on outdated technical proxies or fail to recognize the realities of software engineering inadvertently stifle beneficial innovation. The Digital Fitness Check offers an opportunity to ensure the digital rulebook remains technologically sound and future-proof.

Implementing Regulation on AI Regulatory Sandboxesfiled 8 Jan 2026PDFsource

Regulatory sandboxes have evolved into pivotal governance instruments designed to bridge the gap between accelerating innovation and legal stability. While the draft successfully establishes a harmonized framework for AI experimentation within the Union, it can be further strengthened by adopting "second-generation" sandbox tools - such as accelerated entry mechanisms and digital synthetic testing - to better align…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Techno Polis’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.