Digital Fitness Check brings good opportunity for the review, simplification and re-design where needed- the structure of the digital rules. Instead of bringing new requirements it is important to reflect over the existing AI rulebook so as to streamline underling legislation and adhere to the needs of the industry and all its participants.
ACU
Alum of Cambridge University
Academic / research · Poland
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Alum in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Alum of Cambridge University? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Alum of Cambridge University filed 2 positions between 13 Jan 2026 and 11 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
It is vital for start-ups to work directly with the regulatory Office over the AI regulatory sandboxes. Although the solution would require additional resources on the side of the regulatory such approach would stimulate greater operational flexibility of the start-ups (and SMEs in general) and assure scalability of their businesses in the long run. Therefore point 4.5 would provide more clarity on this issue.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 2 files in common
- Techno Polis · 2 files in common
- appliedAI Institute for Europe · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Alum of Cambridge University’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.