Key messages: - Strong business cases for circularity: The Circular Economy Act must correct market failures to create robust, profitable business cases on a large scale. Transitioning to a circular economy not only requires clear recycled content standards and phasing out high-impact materials, but also strong structural economic incentives to reward circularity and stimulate demand, including through public…
European Banking Federation
Trade union · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 4722660838-23
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #16 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- In addition to the information provided above, the EBF is a member of:
- European Banking Industry Committee (EBIC)
- European Capital Markets Institute (ECMI)
- European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG)
- European League for Economic Cooperation (ELEC)
- European Payments Council (EPC)
- European Services Forum (ESF)
- EU-US Coalition on Financial Regulation
- Federation of European & International Association (FAIB)
- International Banking Federation (IBFed)
- International Fiscal Association (IFA)
- Institut Experts Comptables (IEC)
- and 4 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Banking Federation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Banking Federation filed 26 positions between 30 Jun 2020 and 4 May 2026, across 23 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 26 times.
What they argued
The European Banking Federation strongly supports the goal of simplifying and harmonizing the technical screening criteria across the EU regulatory framework. While we support all efforts for simplification, proportionality, practical applicability and consistency with EU law, we believe the proposed simplification is insufficient to significantly improve the usability of the whole Taxonomy framework.
Key messages & proposals We strongly support the goal of simplifying the technical screening criteria, enhancing clarity and coherence, and reducing unnecessary complexity while maintaining robust environmental standards and the overall integrity of the EU Taxonomy framework.
Key messages & proposals We strongly support the goal of simplifying the technical screening criteria, enhancing clarity and coherence, and reducing unnecessary complexity while maintaining robust environmental standards and the overall integrity of the EU Taxonomy framework.
The European Banking Federation strongly supports the goal of simplifying and harmonizing the technical screening criteria across the EU regulatory framework. While we support all efforts for simplification, proportionality, practical applicability and consistency with EU law, we believe the proposed simplification is insufficient to significantly improve the usability of the whole Taxonomy framework.
The European Banking Federation strongly supports the European Commissions efforts to reduce the complexity of sustainability-related disclosures for capital markets and increase their usability for both investors and financial market participants.
The SFDRs objectives are still relevant. However, there are many shortcomings with the interpretation and implementation of existing requirements, and we welcome the upcoming revision of the SFDR to strengthen the effectiveness of the regulation. We have set out recommendations to improve the framework's usability and transparency for end-investors, with a particular focus on retail investors. Our key messages: 1.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to address the issues with regard to large online platforms with significant network effects acting as gatekeepers and welcomes the opportunity to respond to the published Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on a possible ex-ante regulatory instrument.
The European Banking Federation strongly supports the goal of simplifying and harmonizing the DNSH principle across the EU regulatory framework including its application under the MFF. We support all efforts for simplification, proportionality, practical applicability and consistency with EU law.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions simplification initiative under the Digital Fitness Check. In the attached document, we conducted an examination of 11 legal acts, identifying interplays, overlaps and priority areas for the financial sector where simplification, better coordination and effective enforcement are needed, with the objective of…
The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commission's Call for Evidence for an Impact Assessment on a European Business Wallet. The EU Business Wallet initiative holds significant potential to deliver positive impact across numerous scenarios - from reducing administrative burden and compliance costs, to enhancing cross-border interactions for economic operators and…
The European Banking Federation supports the development of a European legal framework for the limited and complementary use of international emission credits that can support global decarbonization financing and contribute to a cost-efficient and politically durable European climate framework - provided they remain strictly supplementary, meet the highest integrity standards and are embedded in a transparent…
The European Banking Federation (EBF) stresses that, in an increasingly fragile economic and geopolitical context, simplifying the EUs corporate income tax framework is an urgent priority. Current rules impose disproportionate compliance burdens on EU businesses, undermining their global competitiveness.
The EBF welcomes the publication of the Market Infrastructure Package (MIP). By addressing key sources of persisting fragmentation, the Package creates an opportunity to develop even better conditions for markets to operate on a greater scale and efficiency. In doing so, the MIP prepares the ground for ambitious, demand-oriented reforms to maximize their potential to the markets.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Call for Evidence on the European Commissions Action Plan on Fighting Online Fraud. The EBF is the voice of the European banking sector which already invests heavily in fraud prevention and control.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the opportunity to provide additional input on the Commissions proposal for Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT). EBF is supportive, in principle, of the idea of comprehensive and uniform European tax regulation, particularly one that aims to address cross-border obstacles in the corporate tax field.
Banks are central to the functioning of the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) system, as they carry out due diligence and reporting obligations that enable tax authorities to combat tax evasion. Global and EU tax transparency rests on a dense framework combining FATCA, the OECDs Common Reporting Standard (CRS), the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), and the EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation…
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group, ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Banking Federation supports the initiative to make permanent the current transitory prudential treatment for securities financing transactions (SFT) and unsecured transactions with a residual maturity of less than six months, with financial customers, for the purpose of the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Bitkom e.V. · 12 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 11 files in common
- French Banking Federation · 10 files in common
- Association of German Banks · 9 files in common
- German Banking Industry Committee · 8 files in common
Showing 5 of 406.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Banking Federation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.