The revision of the EU Emission Trading System Directive 2003/87/EC must solve important policy design issues between EU ETS and CORSIA, including the changed world post-COVID-19. An intelligent coexistence of both systems is of utmost importance. Europe should not undermine the credibility of CORSIA. Moreover, airlines should not pay twice for the same single ton of CO2.
Lufthansa Group
Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 0714344663-32
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #162 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- IATA - The International Air Transport Association
- A4E - Airlines for Europe
- ENAA - European Network Airlines Association
- E4FC - Europeans for Fair Competition
- BDI - Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie
- BDL - Bundesverband der Deutschen Luftverkehrwirtschaft
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Köln, Germany
- EU office
- Brüssel
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Lufthansa in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Lufthansa Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Lufthansa Group filed 9 positions between 28 Aug 2020 and 14 Aug 2026, across 9 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
REVISION OF THE UNION CUSTOMS CODE November 2023 Lufthansa Group and all its affiliates, which are internationally operating companies, are affected by nearly all legal changes of international trade regulations. As part of the aviation industry, which heavily depends on internationally interconnected supply chains, we rely on a fast cross border movement of goods.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Please find attached Lufthansa Group's contribution to the EU Aviation Strategy Call for Evidence. In short, it is our view that a renewed Aviation Strategy must prioritize competitiveness and fair competition, guided by five principles: 1. Safeguard the EUs strategic autonomy: strong EU network airlines and hubs are essential to maintaining independent European connectivity and to reduce reliance on nonEU carriers.
The existing digital rulebook provides a common regulatory framework, yet its practical impact is limited by overly complex, interpretation-heavy legislation that at times generates more uncertainty than clarity. Key regulationsmost notably the EU AI Actare drafted in broad and abstract terms, leaving businesses without the operational guidance needed for consistent and efficient implementation.
We are convinced that the revised EU Emission Trading System (EU ETS) Directive 2003/87/EC will be a cornerstone of the environmental policy for the aviation industry that will shape the environmental legislation for European aviation for years to come. One of the key challenges for the EU will be to create a regulatory foundation that allows for the coexistence of EU ETS and ICAO’s CO2 offsetting program CORSIA.
Lufthansa Group welcomes the publication of the European Commission´s Passenger Mobility Package and the opportunity to comment on the proposals. The Package aims to facilitate passengers ability to search for, compare, and book multimodal travel options through digital platforms while also addressing long-standing barriers in rail passenger transport.
Please find attached the position of the Lufthansa Group regarding the European Slot Relief Rules. The Lufthansa Group welcomes the opportunity to provide input for an update of Council Regulation No. 95/93 (EU Slot Regulation). An updated EU Slot Regulation (e.g.
The draft raises issues of critical concern for the European aviation industry. Commercial airlines have been strictly regulated under the well-established EU ETS1 system (Annex I of the Directive) since 2012. The introduction of ETS2 for the transport sector must not - under any circumstances - result in uncoordinated carbon cost pass-through by fuel suppliers, market fragmentation, or severe administrative…
Lufthansa Group welcomes the recent publication of the Inception Impact Assessment (Ref. Ares 3635812 - 09/07/2020) on a potential review of the CRS Code of Conduct (Regulation EC 80/2009) and we appreciate the possibility offered to share comments on this Inception Impact Assessment.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Lufthansa Group next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 69.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Lufthansa Group’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.