Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2022/0396(COD) · In Force

Packaging and packaging waste

530 submissions from 469 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 629 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 530 from organizations. Not shown: 66 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 33 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →

Committee ENVIRapporteur Frédérique Ries (Renew)
  1. Commission plans implementing act under Regulation (EU) 2025/40 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 Dece · 7 Sept 2026
  2. Delegated act adopted: Crystal glass packaging – temporary derogation for the lead concentration limits · 11 Aug 2026
  3. Public feedback open: Implementing rules on registering in and reporting to the register of producers · 5 Aug 2026
  4. Commission plans implementing act under parent act · 7 Jul 2026
  5. Published in the Official Journal · 22 Jan 2025

Who showed up

443 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 60 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 7.4 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 443Civil society 60Public authorities, academia, other 27

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

225 of 469
in the EU Register
880
full-time lobbying staff
€108.1M+
declared costs a year
542
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 24 Apr 2023 — it ran from 1 Dec 2022.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
ENVI
Commission reference
COM(2022)677

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep6 Aug 2020
  2. Public consultation6 Jan 2021
  3. Proposal for a regulation24 Apr 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 250 submissions on this page · page 2 of 3 · 530 across the file. Search the whole file

PS

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Przemysłu Kosmetycznego i Detergentowego

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), the proposal of which has been published by the European Commission, will have a very significant impact on the functioning of the companies represented by the Polish Cosmetics and Detergent Industry Association (PSPKD).

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EE

EuRIC - European Recycling Industries' Confederation

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

The European Recycling Industry welcomes the ECs proposal for the new Regulation on Packaging and Packaging Waste [COM (2022) 677] and acknowledges the Commissions commitment to set ambitious measures to boost packaging circularity.

LinkedInX
FF

Finnish Forest Industries Federation

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Finnish Forest Industries Federation (FFIF) supports the European Commissions objective in Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation proposal to reduce packaging waste and increase the reuse, recyclability, and recycling of packaging materials.

LinkedInX
FP

Flexible Packaging Initiative

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Flexible Packaging Initiative’s POSITION PAPER ON PPWR Members of the Flexible Packaging Initiative call for the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation to set the right regulatory framework to enable flexible packaging circularity. Flexible packaging is a highly efficient material providing the right level of safety, quality, product protection and preservation, thereby avoiding food waste.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
FT

FEVE - the European Container Glass Federation

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

FEVE, the European Container Glass Federation, supports the objectives of the proposal for a Packaging & Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) to ensure a well-functioning internal market, tackle the negative environmental and health impacts from packaging and packaging waste and promote the circularity of packaging.

LinkedInX
SE

Stora Enso

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Stora Enso is a renewable materials company. We are one of the largest suppliers of renewable materials used in fiber-based packaging (e.g., cereal boxes, milk cartons, transport packaging, food trays, etc.). We are also amongst the largest recyclers of fiber-based packaging in Europe, and thus produce packaging materials and solutions based on both fresh and recycled fiber.

LinkedInX
AE

ALDI Einkauf SE & Co. oHG (ALDI Nord)

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Our ambition in the ALDI Nord Group of Companies (ALDI Nord), one of the leading pan-European discount retailers, is to make sustainable products affordable. This includes initiatives to make all kinds of packaging reusable, recyclable and containing recycled content.

LinkedInX
KT

KTF - The Swedish Association of Chemical Products Suppliers

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

KTF supports the Commission's intentions to increase circularity and to reduce resource consumption of packaging materials. We would like to make the following comments on the Commission proposal: Harmonisation We are concerned that several of the provisions contained in the PPWR proposal - such as Articles 4(4), 4(5), 11(7) and 45(2) (c) -allow Member States to require or introduce additional national requirements…

LinkedInX
AI

Apofruit Italia Soc. Coop.

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

Apofruit Italia is a fruit and vegetable cooperative of about 3000 members producing fruit and vegetables throughout Italy. It packages different types of products for a volume sold to the market of around 150,000 tonnes of fresh fruit and vegetables for the large-scale retail trade and markets all over the world, using significant quantities of primary and secondary packaging.

LinkedInX
DA

Danish Agriculture & Food Council

· · filed 20 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Dato Side 20. april 2023 1 af 7 European Commission Proposal for a regulation on packaging and packaging waste regulation Commission adoption feedback Landbrug & Fødevarers høringssvar til udkast til Europa-Kommissionens forslag om regulering af emballage og emballageaffald. Kommissionen har udbedt kommentarer til et fremlagt forslag til regulering af emballage og emballageaffald.

Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
MG

Mondi Group

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

Mondi supports Commission proposal, but it still requires key improvements to reach full potential Mondi is a global manufacturer of a wide range of fibre-based and flexible packaging solutions, employing approximately 21.000 colleagues globally. Improvements in recycling infrastructure The main hurdle to boosting recycling is better sorting and collection of materials.

LinkedInX
OG

Otto (GmbH & Co KG)

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Otto Group’s statement on the Proposal for a revision of EU legislation on Packaging and Packaging Waste The Otto Group supports the EU initiative to make an important contribution to resource and climate protection through ambitious sustainability goals. We also welcome the approach of standardizing packaging regulations across the EU.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
GD

Graine de Malice/Loopipak

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

Graine de Malice’s position on the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) We welcome the introduction of reduction and re-use targets but stress that progress is not decisive enough: 1. Recent scientific studies on the environmental and health risks of packaging materials, in particular plastic 2.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FF

FNADE - French association for waste management and environmental services

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

FNADE, the French association for waste management and environmental services welcomes the proposal of the European Commission for a revision of the packaging and packaging waste directive. Overall, the new regulation on packaging and packaging waste represents a step forward for the waste management sector and FNADE globally supports its objectives.

LinkedInX
H

Hipli

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

The proposed revision is interesting but not ambitious enough, in particular with regard to re-use. Some obligations are even less ambitious than certain laws in France (AGEC law with a minimum reuse of 10 % from 2027).

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EV

European Vending & Coffee Service Association

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Please find attached the position of the European Vending & Coffee Service Association (EVA) on the proposal for a Packaging & Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR). Please also fine in the link below a joint letter signed by more than 120 European Associations calling for the internal market legal basis to be maintained…

LinkedInX
GS

Gilead Sciences International Ltd

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

GENERAL COMMENTS It would be worth challenging whether primary packaging components (Bottles, Blisters, Vials, etc) are excluded from this Directive as appears so in the details outlined below. Gilead currently requires 100% virgin materials for primary packaging and changing this would be a significant challenge.

LinkedInX
VD

Verband der Chemischen Industrie e.V.

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

The Verband der Chemische Industrie e.V. (VCI) brings together companies in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry that sell their products to business and private customers worldwide. We welcome the European Commission’s efforts to promote, through the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), as part of the new Circular Economy Action Plan under the Green Deal, a unified framework for the sustainable use…

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EB

European Bioplastics e. V. (EUBP)

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

European Bioplastics (EUBP), the association representing the interests of around 80 member companies from the entire bioplastics value chain, welcomes the Commissions proposal for a revised Regulation on Packaging and Packaging Waste (PPWR).

LinkedInX
N

NABU

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the PPWR draft. Please find attached NABU's feedback. Information on NABU: Founded in 1899, NABU (Nature And Biodiversity Conservation Union) is the oldest and largest environment association in Germany.

LinkedInX

EUROMOT, the European Association of Internal Combustion Engine and Alternative Powertrain Manufacturers, represents the key manufacturers of internal combustion engines and alternative powertrains installed in industrial non-road mobile machinery, marine and stationary applications that are operating in Europe and worldwide.

LinkedInX
NP

No Plastic In My Sea

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Lassociation No Plastic In My Sea welcomes the introduction of the dobjectives for reduction and reuse, but would like this text to be more decisive in terms of: — the latest scientific studies which refer to the environmental and health risks posed by packaging materials, in particular plastic, and the most ambitious approaches currently under way concerning plastic pollution, in particular through the principle of…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
G

GEPC

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

The GEPC, European mushrooms growers' group, representing 90% of the European production of cultivated mushrooms, would like to pinpoint the difficulty to comply with the draft regulation proposal regarding the measure of restriction of use of packaging for single use in the fresh fruit an vegetables sector. (see the note attached).

LinkedInX
CC

Comité Colbert

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

PDF

Proposal for a Regulation on packaging and packaging waste (PPWR) The French Federation for Beauty Companies, the Union des fabricants and the Comité Colbert support the European Commission’s Green Deal and its global ambition towards a more sustainable economy. High-end and luxury industries are renowned for the excellence and exceptional creativity of their products.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
FF

Fass-Frisch GmbH

· · filed 19 Apr 2023 · source

Fass-Frisch GmbH’s comments on the draft European Regulation on packaging and packaging waste, we thank us for the opportunity to comment as an undertaking on the draft Regulation on packaging and packaging waste. In particular, we would like to provide feedback on the aspects of Article 7, the minimum recycled content in plastic packaging.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 530 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.