The proposal to use PPWR Technical Documentation (TD) for producer registration and reporting is not foreseen under the PPWR. It would also create an unnecessary and disproportionate administrative burden for businesses. Requiring companies to submit TDs for reporting purposes would create significant practical challenges, including new data flows, adaptations to reporting systems, and higher compliance costs.
FEA
FEA - European Aerosol Federation
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 32814201372-84
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1519 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #903 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since
Declares membership of
- FEA is part of the informal industry platform DUCC Downstream Users of Chemicals Co-ordination group (more informatio…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Aerosol Federation (FEA)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track FEA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at FEA - European Aerosol Federation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
FEA - European Aerosol Federation filed 3 positions between 4 Oct 2021 and 9 Sept 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2021 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
All aerosol dispensers independently of the container material should be covered by the same legal provisions. In the Annex II Table 1, the format aerosols is correctly included in the categories No 5 Metal / Steel and No 7 Metal / Aluminium. However the format aerosols is missing in the categories No 2 Glass / Composite packaging, of which the majority is glass and No 12 Plastic / PET rigid.
The European Aerosol Federation (FEA) welcomes the proposal to replace the Directive on General Product Safety with an EU Regulation as this will facilitate an improved harmonised application of the law across the EU. We also welcome the principles of application expressed in Article 2, i.e.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put FEA - European Aerosol Federation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 62.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from FEA - European Aerosol Federation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.