107 submissions from 106 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 388 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 107 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
66 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 19 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.5 industry submissions for every one from civil society.
Industry 66Civil society 19Public authorities, academia, other 22
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
What the room declares
28 of 106
in the EU Register
189
full-time lobbying staff
€13.8M+
declared costs a year
109
EP accreditations declared
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 28 Jul 2025 — it ran from 5 May 2025.
Policy area
Industry (DG GROW)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2026 · in 123 days
How it got here
Call for evidence · evaluation21 Mar 2025
Public consultation28 Jul 2025
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Evl.
NATRUE, the International Natural and Organic Cosmetic Association, represents pioneering producers from natural and organic cosmetics sector globally and welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the evaluation of the EU Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). Upholding a strong science-based, risk assessment approach to consumer protection and safety must be maintained as per the CPR's primary objective.
AVICENN is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the Cosmetic products regulation (CPR) and more specifically on its nano-related provisions. We would like to highlight the need for a better definition of the term nanomaterial and a thorough assessment of nano-specific risks in cosmetics.
The Netherlands expresses its appreciation to the Commission for the opportunity to contribute at this stage and looks forward to the forthcoming revision of the CPR. Kindly find attached the proposals we would appreciate being considered for inclusion in the revision.
On behalf of Aromaforum international German association for flavouring therapy and flavouring care... offers small practices and individually manufactured products. Therefore calls for the current plans to be revised. On behalf of Aromaforum int.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
VENATOR, a leading global chemical company dedicated to the development and manufacture of titanium dioxide (TiO2) pigments, UV-filters and performance additives, welcomes the opportunity to provide input to this call for evidence.
The Norwegian Food Safety Authority welcomes the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation and the opportunity to provide input. Our feedback focuses on key areas to enhance consumer safety and improve regulatory clarity for more effective enforcement, as further elaborated in the attached document.
The Brazilian Association of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Industry (ABIHPEC) appreciates the opportunity to contribute to the evaluation of the European Unions Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). This regulation has played a pivotal role in consumer safety and market integration for nearly 50 years, and its impact is evident in the Latin American region.
In Europe, the current recommendation of a definition for nanomaterial dates back to 2011. A new recommendation was published in 2022, however, it has not been enforced yet by any current EU regulation. Moreover, many EU agencies and bodies have their own definition for nanomaterials, notwithstanding the cosmetics regulation.
The following feedback is provided on behalf of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) - the independent Committee of Experts, who advise the Commission on the safety of a range of non-food consumer products, such as cosmetics, personal care products, textiles and other household products.
Effectiveness In general, the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR) provides a solid framework for ensuring consumer safety, which is of the utmost priority. Nonetheless, the absence of clearly defined safe threshold limits for such restricted substances may present challenges in ensuring safety and compliance. (For more details look at Section 5 on Enforcement: Thresholds).
The Titanium Dioxide Manufacturers Association (TDMA) is a sector group of the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) and represents the leading producers of titanium dioxide (TiO). The unique properties of TiO in combination with other colours gives intensity and brightness to decorative cosmetics, as well as allowing manufacturers to create many different shades to suit all skin types.
Preserving Success While Embracing Improvements. The EU Cosmetic Products Regulation (EU CPR) is widely regarded as the global gold standard for cosmetic product safety, ensuring consumer protection while allowing industry innovation.
The French Agency for Health and Safety of Llimentation, Environment and Work (ANSES) thanked the European Commission for organising this call for contributions. The comments made are set out in detail in the attachment and concern the following points: — Grant of derogation for the use of CMR chemicals in cosmetics in the light of Article 15 of the Cosmetics Regulation – Examination of the definition of a…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Unilever believes that every product we make must be safe for people and for our planet and welcomes the Commissions initiative to evaluate the Cosmetic Product Regulation (CPR). CPR is a consumer-oriented legislation that is fit for purpose and effective. It has positively served the needs of consumers and regulators to ensure safety and compliance.
Kindly find below 2 feedback related to vigilance activity: 1) According to the Art. 23, a serious adverse effect (SUE) has to be submitted to the members states where the effect occurred. Taking into consideration that consumers are used to travel, would it be suitable to add the following precision?
Detic is the Belgian and Luxembourg association for producers and distributors of cosmetics, cleaning and maintenance products, adhesives, sealants, biocides and aerosols. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Call for Evidence. Detic is member of Cosmetics Europe (CE).
Stanpa, representing over 300 cosmetics companies in Spain, supports the European Commissions initiative to evaluate the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). This regulation has ensured consumer safety, promoted innovation, and maintained the competitiveness of the European market.
The CPR has not delivered on its objective to end the testing of cosmetics products and ingredients on animals for two reasons: 1. Despite repeated pleas from animal protection organisations since the inception of REACH in 2001 to ensure that there is coherence between the CPR and REACH with respect to animal testing requirements, the Commission have failed to address this issue.
Eurogroup for Animals commends the Commissions initiative to review the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and welcomes the opportunity to contribute to this public consultation. This evaluation is essential for upholding the EUs high safety and ethical standards for cosmetic products.
ERPA supports the Cosmetics Product Regulation (CPR) effectiveness as being a global standard to promote the safety of cosmetics. In light of the exercise on evaluating CPR possible improvements, ERPA calls for clearer guidelines on the responsibilities of the Responsible Person (RP) and the qualifications of the Safety Assessor (SA): Specific profile for the RP team demonstrating qualifications Specific profile for…
The Council of the Latin American Cosmetic, Personal Care and Home Care Industries CASIC, appreciates this opportunity for participation, which allows us to highlight the importance and impact of the European Unions Cosmetic Product Regulation in the Latin American Region.
The evaluation of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products should uphold a fundamental principle: preserving naturality in the cosmetic value chain. Hundreds of territories in Europe from Provence to Andalusia, from Liguria to Bulgaria, live from the cultivation of perfume, aromatic and medicinal plants (PPAM) and their transformation into natural ingredients.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
FEBEA brings together and represents more than 300 manufacturing companies, of which more than 80 % are SMEs, selling cosmetic products in France and internationally within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 (perfumes, make-up, hairdressing products, care products and sanitary and toilet products), which are marketed through numerous distribution systems.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
EFfCI is the European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients, a trade association representing European manufacturers of synthetic and natural ingredients for the cosmetics and personal care industry. Our membership comprises large multinational organizations and SME EFfCI welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the review of the EU Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) in line with Better Regulation guidelines.
The trade association Cannabiswirtschaft e.V. (BvCW) represents around 100 companies in the cannabis sector, many of which are involved in the CBD cosmetics industry. As part of the evaluation of the EU Cosmetic Products Regulation, the BvCW sees a need for action to remove regulatory uncertainties and achieve market harmonisation.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The German Environment Agency would like to provide feedback on the following topics regarding Regulation 1223/2009 on cosmetic products: - Preservatives in cosmetic products - Definition of nanomaterials - Surfactants in rinse-off cosmetic products - Environmental labelling of cosmetic products The detailed comments can be found in the attached document.
The CPR is one of the most important and comprehensive legal framework in the European, provides a high level of consumer protection, ensuring that cosmetics placed on the EU market are safe. Cosmetics are an essential products, providing a positive impact on health prevention (sun protection products, oral care products and many others).
The Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency considers that the Cosmetic Products Regulation has worked positively towards safety of human health when prohibiting or restricting use of certain harmful substances. The system for communication of serious undesirable effects has enabled quick actions across Member States.
We welcome the European Commission's efforts to evaluate the legal requirements for cosmetics for modern, business-oriented and consumer-oriented development. We appreciate the opportunity to comment and would like to make the following statement: We recognize the need for regulatory requirements to protect consumers from health risks.
We recognize the significant impact of the CPR in shaping the global standards for cosmetic products. The CPR has played a crucial role in ensuring consumer safety and harmonizing the European cosmetics market, which in turn influences international practices and expectations.
The European Cosmetics Regulation is probably one of the most stringent in the world. It serves as a reference and inspire many countries in setting up their own regulatory framework. He is the guarantor of world-recognised quality and linnocuity cosmetics. Cosmetic ingredients must comply with both the chemical regulations and the Cosmetics Regulation with European cosmetics.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Wella Company welcomes the opportunity to share its experience as a cosmetic manufacturer and EU Responsible Person from the very first establishment of the EU Cosmetic Directive in 1976, having interacted with the Scientific Committee on Cosmetology (now the SCCS) since 1980, having lived through the implementation of chemicals regulation since the EU Commissions White paper on future chemical strategy issued…
Revision of the CPR could simplify the implementation of EU legislation applicable to chemicals. The Call for Evidence asks whether the CPR is internally consistent and whether it aligns with other chemicals legislation. The answer, certainly in relation to alignment of animal testing provisions, is clearly that it does not.
KoHF represents the cosmetics and personal care industry in Sweden. Our members represent a significant part of the Swedish cosmetics industry in value, including more than 150 companies, from Micro to Large, global Enterprises. Conclusion The cosmetics legislation key principles have withstood the test of time since 1976.
Since its application in 2013, the CPR has continuously demonstrated its performance in achieving those 2 objectives and CPR is still considered as the global standard for international cosmetic regulations. We emphasize that CPR is the only regulation requiring a safety assessment of every product placed on the market.
The Ministry of Environment and Gender Equality of Denmark appreciates the opportunity to provide comments. Please, find in the attached documet our comments to the topics Generic Risk Approach, Mixture assessment factor, Definition of nanomaterials, Definition of cosmetic products, Digital labelling, Online sales and enforcement of online sales as well as Products for professional use only.
IKW statement on the revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) The German Cosmetic, Toiletry, Perfumery and Detergent Association (IKW) represents companies that manufacture or distribute beauty care products in Germany. IKW has over 440 member companies with a total annual turnover of 34.6 billion euros. In addition to larger, globally active companies, the vast majority of member companies are SMEs.
Comments from the Swedish Medical Products Agency are provided in the attached document. Overall, we see a need for revision on the following areas: - adaptions to the new digital market - nomenclature and regulated ingredients - CPNP - unclarities regarding the animal testing ban - safeguard clause - claims - the process for SUE reporting - products for professional use - sunscreen products - GMP certificates -…
In our view, as part of the official controls, we would like to stress that Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is a comprehensive but nevertheless manageable set of rules for the marketing of cosmetic products, which is well applied in practice. In particular, the obligation to draw up the safety report has contributed to the protection of human health. Nevertheless, we would like to make the following observations: 1.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
We welcome a revision of Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 (CPR). In our view, the following aspects should be considered in a revision: 1. The CPR currently does not contain any regulations regarding on labeling for online sales to final consumers. Due to the increase in the marketing of cosmetic products via online commerce, regulations are needed. 2.
The association's detailed position is attached. This is an executive summary of our position. The Danish Association of Cosmetics and Detergents welcomes the opportunity to comment on the call for evidence for the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation, which is of great interest to our members.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals UK (PETA) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the evaluation of the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR). As an Internal Market measure, the CPR is intended to harmonise the free movement of goods and protect human health by ensuring that products meet strict safety requirements.
Fat on 21 March 2025 * PRODAROM’s reply to the European Commission’s call for contribution for an evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation: PRODAROM, Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques, IFRA member, representing in France the industry of aromatic substances and compositions intended for perfumery, fully supports IFRA’s response to this call for evidence.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) plays a vital role in protecting consumer health and interests. Still, the CPR suffers from major shortcomings, as documented e.g. by the fitness check on endocrine disruptors. Therefore, BEUC strongly regrets that the European Commission has yet to present a proposal to revise the CPR, as announced in the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.
PSVAK and the Greek Cosmetics Industry acknowledge the European cosmetics industry's leadership in innovation, sustainability, and consumer safety. While the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR) has been effective, PSVAK believes it needs modernization to meet evolving industry and consumer needs. 1.
On behalf of ARTHES Swiss Association for Aromatherapy and Preservation, I would like to comment on the current Cosmetics Regulation and the challenges it poses for our members and the practice of flavouring therapy. Aroma therapist:in their work, individual mixtures of natural pure essential oils and vegetable oils are produced that are specifically adapted to the needs of the client.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The European Environmental Bureau, supported by the Zero Mercury Working Group, appreciates the opportunity to provide evidence on the evaluation of the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR). The CPR has played a crucial role in ensuring a high level of consumer safety, notably by keeping the most harmful substances out of cosmetics, becoming a reference at global level.
Deutsche Tierschutzbund e.V. welcomes the call for evidence on an evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation in the European Union and uses the opportunity to submit feedback in this context. We would like to draw attention to important shortcomings affecting animal welfare, which are clearly called for by consumers.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Obelis s.a., Authorised Representative and Responsible Person, welcomes the initiative of the European Commission to evaluate the functioning of The Cosmetic Products Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 (hereinafter as the Regulation).
I would like to stress the importance of maintaining the balance between protecting consumers and supporting the various practices in the area of flavouring therapy. Trained aromatic therapists offer valuable services based on natural ingredients. Too strict rules could limit the diversity and flexibility of this practice and reduce access to healthy therapies for consumers.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Cosmetics Europe welcomes the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and looks forward to contributing to the process to ensure the European cosmetics and personal care industry can remain competitive, innovative, sustainable and a pillar of European excellence.
Ladies and Gentlemen, we find that the current Cosmetics Regulation works well in many respects. Nevertheless, we have two indications for revision. 1. It is precisely discussed whether the list of ingredients on product packaging could only be provided via a QR code or a website.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Finnish Cosmetic and Hygiene industry Association is an industry association representing both domestic and multinational cosmetics companies of all sizes in Finland. The association is a member of Cosmetics Europe. European citizens including Finnish people use cosmetics, such as body lotions, make-up, shampoos, toothpastes, soaps and deodorants, every day.
ICADA e.V. represents small and medium-sized companies in the German-speaking cosmetics industry. The EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 in its current form represents a successful, harmonized legislation at the EU level but here are some points showing room for improvement. The definition of cosmetic products should include parts of the ears that are considered external in order to avoid boderline issue (Art.
As a nursing professional and a qualified aroma therapist, it is my concern to be able to make cosmetic mixtures individually to meet the needs of individual clients. If I wanted to do so, I would be both the financial hurdles and the bureaucratic hurdles too high to make this professional.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
CPR has been effective in maintaining consumer health since its entry into force, with the SCCS playing a vital role in this. The CPR is often seen as the 'gold standard' in cosmetic legislation globally, with many countries adopting the legislation as is. SCCS expert opinions and guidance are recognized as world-leading and adopted globally.
The Austrian Chamber of Commerce welcomes the European Commission’s efforts to evaluate the cosmetics regulatory framework in order to allow for further development. The current legal framework provides the basis for a high quality of cosmetic products and thus also for the protection of consumers.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
CosIng Since the new update of COSings is distinguished between Ingredient and Substance. In some cases, the limitations in the annexes are not displayed for the INCI entry but only for the Substance record, e.g. INCI Disperse RED 17. The latter has an entry in Annex III No 294 which is not displayed for INCI, but only for Substance 2.6-Di-Tert-butyl-4-methylphenol.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The EU Cosmetics Product Regulation has basically set out a model of risk-based safety assessment, which has worked very effective and has served as a model for assessments not only in the EU but also in other countries and regions. However, the recent shift to a hazard-based assessment model (General Risk Assessment (GRA)) in the CLP regulation and REACH goes against this principle of risk-based safety assessment.
The Child Rights International Network (CRIN) is grateful for this opportunity to take stock of the efficiency - and deficiencies - of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR). This summary reflects our inputs available in the attached document, with references to scientific studies and human rights requirements hereby mentioned.
Introduction The European Federation of Essential Oils (EFEO) expresses its gratitude to the European Commission for the opportunity to contribute to the initial evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009. General Comments EFEO reaffirms that the CPR has proven to be a relevant, efficient, and proportionate regulatory framework.
Fecc acknowledges the consultation on the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and welcomes the opportunity to provide input. As the leading voice for the European chemical distribution sector, we represent companies that play a vital role in the supply chain of cosmetic ingredients, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and maintaining high standards of safety and sustainability.
Ladies and Gentlemen, as one of many small and micro enterprises (EPUs) in the sector, I call on you to take account of small cosmetic manufacturers separately in the Cosmetics Regulation. The reality of a micro-enterprise is completely different from that of a large company or group, both in terms of financial, human and technical resources.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
(1) adapting the Regulation to the reality of small and micro-enterprises in order to strengthen their important role for society. There is currently almost the same level of safety and testing at different product-risk levels.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products (R. 1223/2009) has been a very useful legislative tool over the past 15 years, fulfilling its main objectives: 1. Providing legal certainty 2. Guaranteeing a high level of health protection 3. Preserving animal welfare 4. Establishing the responsibilities of economic operators 5.
The revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation represents an important opportunity to adapt the Regulation to the expectations of citizens and taking into account the progress made in research and development since the entry into force of the Regulation. The revision needs to reflect the requirements of the ‘Save cruelty-free Cosmetics’ citizens’ initiative, which gathered over 1.2 million signatures in 2023.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Cosmetica Italia the Italian cosmetic industry association - represents the Italian cosmetics and personal care industry and since 1967 supports over 640 companies - large and small companies present throughout the country - supporting their growth and development in Italy and on foreign markets.
Hello, we kindly ask you to find our answers to the call for evidence for the evaluation of the Cosmetics Regulation. (see attached document). Happy day, Cordially, WW Regulatory Monitoring and International Support Team [email removed] Laboratoires M -L | ZI Saint Maurice 04100 Manosque, France | LOccitane Group
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The contribution on the Cosmetics Regulation provides a number of important insights to improve safety and transparency in the sector. One of the most significant points concerns the visibility of the PAO (Period After Opening) on the packaging.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
The current EU Cosmetics Regulation presents a significant challenge, especially for small businesses and aroma practitioners. While it was originally designed to protect consumers, its undifferentiated application leads to disproportionate hurdles for businesses producing individual, tailor-made products. 1.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Since its adoption over 15 years ago, the CPR has established itself as a gold standard in Europe, creating a unified legal framework to protect consumer health by ensuring that all cosmetics meet strict safety requirements before being placed on the market.
The Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) welcomes the Call for Evidence on the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation No 1223/2009 (CPR). Considering that the CPR aims to protect consumer health, and in light of the many chemicals of concern still found in cosmetics products, we believe a revision of the regulation would improve its relevance e.g.
The Movement for the Protection of Citizens (MDC) welcomes the European Commission’s evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (PRC), stressing the importance of updating the regulatory framework to address the new challenges posed by the green and digital transitions.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
1. Clear criteria for the quality of raw materials and manufacturing processes According to the provisions of Article 17, traces of prohibited substances (Annex II) are permitted if they are technically unavoidable and are safe for human health. In practice, however, it is difficult to determine when a substance is technically unavoidable, which makes enforcement more difficult.
Since its full implementation in 2013, CPR has played a central role in consumer protection across the EU's internal market and has served as a reference for regulatory development in many countries worldwide. However, in recent years, various other EU regulations concerning chemical substances have increasingly impacted the regulatory framework applied to cosmetics, leading to a situation where it is difficult to…
The EU Cosmetics Regulation has been a resounding success in establishing a free and open European market for cosmetics. It is widely accepted around the world and created a model for other regulatory bodies. The response deals with the issue of microbiological risk and product preservation. Preservation is required in any formulation where there is sufficient free water to support the growth of micro-organisms.
Korea Cosmetic Association (KCA) Submission on the EU Cosmetics Regulation (CPR) Review In response to the European Commissions request for input on the evaluation of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (CPR), the Korea Cosmetic Association (KCA) would like to submit the following opinions.
As manufacturers of cosmetic products (primarily soaps and creams), we are convinced that EU-wide rules and regulations are needed to ensure the quality of our products and protect the health of consumers. As a major challenge for small businesses like us, we see a wide variety of regulators on partly similar/identical issues and would therefore like to see harmonisation of CVOs, IFRA, REACH and CLP.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Chief Sanitary Inspectorate POLAND We would like to thank the European Commission for taking action to review the functioning of the provisions of the Regulation 1223/2009 on cosmetic products. We believe that the Cosmetics Product Regulation (CPR) contributes to the protection of consumer health. It also ensures the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Comments on the EU Cosmetics Regulation’s concerns of an individual entrepreneur in the area of flavouring practice. As a freshly founded individual company in the area of flavouring practice, I face enormous bureaucratic and financial challenges when it comes to the production of individual fragrance compositions and cosmetic mixtures.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Effectiveness: The existing regulation is strongly targeted at large enterprises with standardised products and represents a significant bureaucratic burden for micro and small enterprises. Customised individual blends that are tailored to customers’ needs (e.g. in flavouring practices) should not be subject to the same strict requirements as bulk products.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
(1) Effectiveness: The regulation is optimised for large companies with standardised products, while creating disproportionate bureaucratic hurdles for micro and small enterprises. Individual individual mixtures, often prepared for specific customer needs (e.g. in professional flavouring practices), should not be subject to the same requirements as mass-produced cosmetics.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
1. Effectiveness: The regulation is optimised for large companies with standardised products, while creating disproportionate bureaucratic hurdles for micro and small enterprises. Individual individual mixtures, which are often prepared for specific customer needs (e.g. in professional flavouring practices), should not be subject to the same requirements as mass-produced cosmetics.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
This submission addresses key considerations for the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR), focusing on its effectiveness, relevance, coherence, and EU added value. The revision presents a crucial opportunity to align the regulation with scientific advancements, public expectations, and ethical principles while ensuring consumer and environmental protection. Key Considerations: 1.
Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 aims to ensure consumer safety while ensuring harmonisation of the cosmetic market within the European Union. However, the management of INCI names remains particularly complex due to the coexistence of several regulatory references: the Regulation itself, the glossary 2022/677, the CosIng database and the PCPC dictionary.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
It is absolutely necessary to adapt the laws to their size. Aroma practitioners work directly on the individual – no mass production. So it’s just on! Individualised mixtures. Therefore, blanket rules and laws are neither fair nor ethically justifiable. The comparison of mass production, as opposed to individuals, must therefore be strongly rejected!
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Effectiveness: The regulation is optimised for large companies with standardised products, while creating disproportionate bureaucratic hurdles for micro and small enterprises. Individual individual mixtures, which are often prepared for specific customer needs (e.g. in professional flavouring practices), should not be subject to the same requirements as mass-produced cosmetics.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The current EU Cosmetics Regulation focuses in particular on large companies with standardised products. However, it imposes a disproportionate administrative burden on small businesses producing individual mixtures. Why the Regulation needs to be adapted: 1.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
1. Effectiveness: The regulation is optimised for large companies with standardised products, while creating disproportionate bureaucratic hurdles for micro and small enterprises. Individual individual mixtures, which are often prepared for specific customer needs (e.g. in professional flavouring practices), should not be subject to the same requirements as mass-produced cosmetics.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Effectiveness: The regulation is optimised for large companies with standardised products, while creating disproportionate bureaucratic hurdles for micro and small enterprises. Individual individual mixtures, which are often prepared for specific customer needs (e.g. in professional flavouring practices), should not be subject to the same requirements as mass-produced cosmetics.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
COMMENTS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC ON TARGETED REVISION OF THE COSMETIC PRODUCT REGULATION AND APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 15.2. ON NATURAL COMPLEX SUBSTANCES (NCSS) The Czech Republic for the area of cosmetic products provides an updated position on the targeted revision of the Cosmetic Product Regulation (CPR) and on the application of the article 15.2.
Marianne Pircher’s opinion on 12 March 2025 Effectiveness: The regulation is optimised for large companies with standardised products, while creating disproportionate bureaucratic hurdles for micro and small enterprises. Individual individual mixtures, which are often prepared for specific customer needs (e.g.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
I find the hurdles for a small company that customises products to individual customers are too high. I know each of my clients personally and only do so after ordering and in individual doses. Reserve samples are economically unaffordable. When buying a product from other EU countries subject to the same rules, there are often no ingredients in the product.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The EU Cosmetic regulation requires to demonstrate product safety of cosmetic products, but it looks like that this endpoint is not completely addressed and reached both by manufacturers and/or by safety assessors.
Effectiveness: The Regulation is mainly tailored to large companies with standardised production processes. However, it represents considerable bureaucratic hurdles for individual companies in flavouring practices, which are unreasonably high compared to the artisanal production of individual mixtures.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Include natural cosmetics in the EU Cosmetics Regulation. Address in this respect the topics of CMR substances and allergens from natural sources. Clear ppm definition of ‘unavoidable traces’. Is currently a grey zone. Uniform logic in the allergen declaration: colour leaf, plant, extract... Also include instructions on allergen precursors or clearly state that they should not be followed.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
First of all, I would like to stress that the European Cosmetics Regulation, in its current form, is one of the most successful pieces of EU legislation. It is drafted in a poorly bureaucratic and understandable way.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
I find the Cosmetics Regulation very restrictive, in particular the designation of the many different allergens (especially after the last enlargement) as one-person companies. I think it is disproportionate and prevents many small natural cosmetic suppliers from going out with their offers. The time to be spent on administration is disproportionate.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
To whom this may concern, On behalf of our daughter company, PXG Pharma, PHOENIX group is happy to share its position on the evaluation of Cosmetic Products Regulation with the Commission. Against this background, please find attached our contribution to the evaluation process.
Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products establishes strict requirements for any cosmetic product placed on the market, ensuring its proper functioning and a high level of human health protection. A cosmetic product is defined as any substance or mixture intended to be applied to the external parts of the human body (epidermis, hair, nails, lips, external genital organs) or to the teeth and oral mucosa…
The EU cosmetic legislation has failed to increase consumer safety regarding acrylate-based artificial nail products the use of which carries a risk of acrylate contact allergy. Contact allergy is permanent and may have adverse health effects on the consumer beyond the inability to use acrylic nails anymore.
Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products constitutes a strict framework for the safety of products placed on the EU market, but it has certain limits which it is relevant to highlight. One of these limits concerns the assessment of safety in the case of the combined use of several cosmetic products in a daily routine or in an aesthetic protocol.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
As a medium-sized company producing cosmetic products, we are fully affected by the Cosmetics Regulation. For a future variant, the following points would be relevant for us: (1) The use of claims on labels is subject to various requirements under advertising and environmental law, in addition to the vague Cosmetics Claims Regulation.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The environmental impact of cosmetic products remains largely unknown to the public. Unlike chemicals, detergents, or biocides, which are subject to classification and labeling obligations under the CLP Regulation, the labeling of cosmetics does not clearly indicate their ecotoxicological hazards.
The **EU Cosmetic Regulation (EC 1223/2009)** has played a critical role in ensuring the safety of cosmetic products for consumers. By mandating a comprehensive safety assessment, responsible person (RP) oversight, and strict ingredient regulations, it has set a **global benchmark** for cosmetic safety.
My name is Prof Stefan Wöhrl MD MSc, dermatologist and allergologist and medical head at the Floridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Vienna, Austria. Some 10 years ago I served as the national representative at the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. I published my first study about contact (Type IV) allergy to Fragance-containing ingredients in 2001 [1-4].
The Cosmetics Regulation is a great improvement of the former Directive and has given a common frame with clear guidelines as to how to assess the safety of a cosmetic product. Yet, many non EU cosmetic products reach the market with just a CPNP number and no assurance that a full PIF and a full CPSR is readily available. What about adding a field on the CPNP for the CPSR-B upload and the Safety Assessor's CV?
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
