Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2023/0272(COD) · In Force

Mercury: dental amalgam and other mercury-added products subject to manufacturing, import and export restrictions

47 submissions from 41 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 213 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 47 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee ENVIRapporteur Marlene Mortler (EPP)
  1. Published in the Official Journal · 10 Jul 2024
  2. Signed · 13 Jun 2024
  3. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 30 May 2024
  4. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 24 May 2024
  5. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 22 May 2024

Who showed up

7 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 32 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 7Civil society 32Public authorities, academia, other 8

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

11 of 41
in the EU Register
108
full-time lobbying staff
€950K+
declared costs a year
53
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 8 Sept 2023 — it ran from 14 Jul 2023.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
ENVI
Commission reference
COM(2023)395

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep2 Apr 2021
  2. Public consultation3 May 2022
  3. Proposal for a regulation8 Sept 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 47 submissions.

My name is Servando Pérez-Domínguez. I do represent, since 2007, the totally independent Spanish national NGO MERCURIADOS.org (made up of patients who have scientifically proved that their very diverse health problems derive from dental Hg poisoning, mercurial allergy-hypersensitivity and/or oral electrogalvanism caused by these metal fillings).

LinkedInX
TL

Tandhälsoförbundet

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

Dental Health Association opinion is that EU need to stop using amalgam as soon as possible, we can’t wait until 2030. Mercury from dental amalgam will spread via air and wastewater from humans and from dental clinics. Mercury is highly toxic for nature and for people. We don’t need more mercury pollution and future EU need to stop amalgam in Dentistry immediately and it is possible at least until 2025.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

CREPD Cameroon, applauds this proposal and welcomes the opportunity to comment! Worldwide, more than 30 countries have already phased out the use of amalgam to protect the environment and health and have proven that an amalgam phase-out is feasible due to the availability of effective and cost-efficient alternatives.

LinkedInX
CO

College of Dentists Timis/Romania

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

On the use of dental amalgam, the Impact Assessment concluded that the preferred policy option is to introduce an EU-wide obligation to phase-out the use of dental amalgam as from 2025, given that (i) it would lead to the greatest environmental and health benefits, including in terms of reductions in mercury emissions from crematoria, (ii) this timeframe is implementable as demonstrated by those Member States that…

LinkedInX
EN
PDF

Dental amalgam is the major remaining intentional use of Mercury in the EU. Only its phase-out by 2025 can avoid the release of approximately 10 tons of mercury into the environment by 2030. Any further use is unnecessary and contributes to the already elevated concentrations. The current environmental conditions are alarming.

LinkedInX
EE

European Environmental Bureau

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The European Environmental Bureau welcomes the release of European Commissions proposal for revision the EU Mercury Regulation. We comment the Commission for taking responsibility for what it exports to developing countries; yet the ban on linear (LFL) and non-linear fluorescent lamps should take place much faster and as early as 2025, aligning them with domestic bans, and irrespective of global decisions, in line…

LinkedInX
NN

NAMD - Non Au Mercure Dentaire - ONG FRANCE

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

Why remove dental amalgam as soon as possible and for everyone? — Because, according to the IAOMT (International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology), it is all the largest source of mercury poisoning. Mercury is a reprotoxic (passed down from generation to generation) a genotoxic (altering genes), a neurotoxic.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CN

Conseil national de l'Ordre des chirurgiens-dentistes

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

The proposed deadline of 1 January 2025 is too short. In France, it does not allow the profession or the national care system to adapt in time to the disappearance of the product. Aware of the health and environmental challenges, the National Association of Dental Surgeons has, in its replies to previous consultations, outlined the well-known safety problems to be addressed and the exceptional situations of certain…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
C

CLASP

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

CLASP thanks the European Commission for the opportunity to comment on the review of the EU law on Mercury. The EU has led the global transition to efficient and mercury-free lighting in recent years by phasing-out general-purpose fluorescent lighting across Europe in 2023, and supported by the regions extensive LED manufacturing sector.

LinkedInX
DS

Deutsche Sozialversicherung Europavertretung (DSV)

· · filed 8 Sept 2023 · source

On 14 July, the European Commission presented a proposal for a regulation to revise the EU mercury regulation with the aim of protecting EU citizens and the environment from toxic mercury. It aims to ban all forms of mercury in the EU, including the use, production and export of dental amalgam from 1 January 2025. The DSV welcomes the objective of improving environmental and health protection.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CO

Council of European Dentists

· · filed 7 Sept 2023 · source

The CED continues supporting the proactive and effective phase down of dental amalgam in Europe. Nevertheless, in light of the European Commission (EC) proposal for the revision of the Mercury Regulation ((EU) 2017/852), we would like to express several considerations, important for patients, dental care delivery and the dental profession.

LinkedInX
AW

This feedback is given on behalf of Armenian Women for Health and Healthy Environment (AWHHE), NGO from Armenia, which represents the civil society in the National Committee of the Minamata Convention on mercury. AWHHE is confident that it is feasible to prohibit the use, manufacturing, and export of amalgam and therefore endorses the phasing-out of dental amalgam in the EU by 2025.

LinkedInX

ZERO is a Portuguese Environmental NGO that has followed the issue of mercury for several years and has been advocating for a fast phase out of dental amalgam containing mercury. We are totally in favour of the Commission's proposal to phase-out dental amalgam by 2025. We support this approach because we will be able to avoid 10 t of Mercury that would otherwise be released into the environment by 2030!

LinkedInX
AC

Asian Center for Environmental Health

· · filed 6 Sept 2023 · source

I, representing Asian Center for Environmental Health and Environment and Social Development Organization (ESDO), endorse the phasing-out of dental amalgam in the EU by 2025. The authorities will prohibit the use, manufacturing, and export of amalgam starting from January 1, 2025..

LinkedInX
EU

EKO-UNIA

· · filed 6 Sept 2023 · source

The Eco-UNIA Ecological Association of Wrocław has been in favour of and has been working for years to phase out the use, production and export of dental amalgam in Poland, the European Union and the World as soon as possible. We now call for the phase-out of amalgam across the European Union by 2025, which is not costly and good for health but also for the environment.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
VM

Verband medizinischer Fachberufe e.V.

· · filed 6 Sept 2023 · source

“The Association of Medical Professionals supports the European Commission’s proposal to phase out amalgam 2025 In working with amalgam, mercury vapour is released in practice. As 99 % of dental specialists in Germany are female and mercury is harmful to both fertility and the unborn child, we are at particular risk.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
UU

Uppsala university

· · filed 5 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

I'm an independent academic, having for several decades researched many aspects of mercury, ranging from environmental and health affetcs of mercury used in goldmining to dental amalgam, including the link between dental amalgam and illegal gold mining using mercury. The mercury is often imported legally into Latin American countries for use in goldmining by stating that the mercury will be used for dental use.

LinkedInX
DD
PDF

The German Society for Environmental Dental Medicine (DEGUZ) welcomes the Commission’s proposal to phase out amalgam in 2025 and supports the accompanying measures. The EU’s phase-out of amalgam is an important step towards greener and more healthy dentistry. Amalgam, which contains 50 % mercury, poses a potential risk to the environment and health, both to patients and dentists and dental practitioners.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

Joint opinion on the proposal for an amendment of the EU Mercury Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/852) [COM(2023) 395 final] of the European Commission of 14 July 2023 The Bundeszahnärztekammer (BZÄK), the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde (DGZMK) would like to make use of the possibility granted by the European Commission to…

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CE

Concorde East/West Srl

· · filed 4 Sept 2023 · source

I have studied this issue for more than ten years, including dental amalgam alternatives, costs, etc. I have reviewed dozens of peer-reviewed papers, carried out research for the European Commission and others, presented my research findings to WHO and others, and I can say categorically that: - prevention and separators are not viable solutions to the dental mercury problem; - there are safe and affordable…

LinkedInX
BE

BBFU e.V.

· · filed 3 Sept 2023 · source

The Federal Association of Advisory Bodies for Environmentalgifts, in particular amalgam, heavy metals and wood preservatives e.V., supports the European Commission’s proposal to phase out amalgam in 2025. If I had known at that time that the highly toxic mercury vapour was released by the use of amalgam fillings in relevant quantities, I would not have had it left it.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
L

LightingEurope

· · filed 11 Aug 2023 · source

PDF

LightingEurope welcomes the European Commissions ambition to reduce the mercury amount that is put on the global market to limit environmental and social impacts. From our side, we are working in the Global Lighting Association with organisations from other regions to forge an industry consensus for a global ban of general lighting mercury containing lamps that works for all regions.

LinkedInX
AM

A.M.I.C.A.

· · filed 15 Jul 2023 · source

I am the deputy president of the Chronic and Environmental Intoxication Diseases Association and we help people harmed by the mercury of dental amalgams and the environment. There is an urgent need to ban the use of mercury in any sector where substitution by other materials and techniques is possible. The damage caused by mercury is irreversible and very serious.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
VP

Vesiluonnon puolesta ry

· · filed 2 Apr 2021 · source

The review of mercury legislation is important and worthwhile, but its perspective is unnecessarily narrow and the proposed measures need to be more ambitious with timelines. Mercury is a major pollutant with major public health implications. The statements of the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) are supported and recommended. Combustion plants are significant source of mercury.

LinkedInX
IA

International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology

· · filed 2 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

I am submitting this comment on behalf of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT). Our non-profit organization represents over 1,000 dentists and other health professionals in more than 30 countries around the globe, and I serve as the Executive Chairperson of the IAOMT Board of Directors.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 47 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.