Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2020/0289(COD) · In Force

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention

79 submissions from 72 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 208 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 79 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

21 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 50 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 21Civil society 50Public authorities, academia, other 8

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

32 of 72
in the EU Register
247
full-time lobbying staff
€20.8M+
declared costs a year
131
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 10 Dec 2020 — it ran from 15 Oct 2020.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Commission reference
COM(2020)642

How it got here

  1. Roadmap3 Apr 2020
  2. Proposal for a regulation10 Dec 2020

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 79 submissions.

YA

Youth and Environment Europe (YEE)

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

As Youth and Environment Europe (YEE) its essential for us that young people can hold EU's Member States and EU institutions accountable to take the necessary action to protect our future. Strong procedural environmental rights are a guarantee that young people will be able ensure the EU achieves its climate objectives by 2050 at the latest.

LinkedInX
ZW

Zero Waste Alliance Ireland

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

Zero Waste Alliance Ireland (ZWAI) would like to highlight our concerns about the true lack of implementation of the Aarhus Regulation and wants to see the full adoption of its provisions an obligation by all actors concerned, especially legislators and authorities.

LinkedInX
SL

Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitto ry

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

The Finnish Nature Conservation Association supports the proposal. The proposal extends the existing possibilities for NGOs to request an administrative review. At present, administrative review can only be requested in the case of individual actions (acts addressed directly to a person or by which the person concerned can be identified), but in the future non-governmental organisations may also request a review of…

Filed in Finnish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EE

European Environmental Bureau (EEB)

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

The EEB welcomes the fact that the Commission has published its proposal to amend the Aarhus Regulation, with its stated intention to widen the opportunities to review decisions by the EU institutions that harm the environment. The proposal addresses a major obstacle to access to justice, namely the limitation of acts that may be challenged to measures of individual scope.

LinkedInX
CE

CAN Europe

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Delivering the Union’s commitment to achieving climate neutrality and resilience will depend crucially on whether and how well the EU institutions use their powers to take the necessary action to ensure the EU achieves its climate objectives by 2050 at the latest. It is therefore essential that the EU institutions can be held to account for taking the necessary action.

LinkedInX

We support the general principles of the Aarhus Convention (AC). However, we are critical that the current proposal contains redefinitions and reinterpretations that go well beyond the original scope of the Aarhus Convention. Actions of general scope will in future also be covered by the AC (“acts of general scope”).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EA

EURACOAL aisbl

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

EURACOAL welcomes this opportunity to respond on the important topic of access to environmental justice and how this relates to EU law. Our attached position paper explains why EURACOAL rejects proposals to amend the Aarhus Regulation. The proposal to extend the rights of review and legal action is not in line with EU law which requires equal access to justice.

LinkedInX
WE

WWF European Policy Office

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Delivery of the European Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver on their commitments. Presently, there are no effective means for the public to seek judicial review of EU acts that breach environmental law.

LinkedInX
M

Mellanskog

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Mellanskog’s response to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention Mellanskog is a Forest owner’s association with more than 26,000 members in the Swedish midlands.

LinkedInX
EC

European Crop Protection Association (ECPA)

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

ECPA understands that the proposed revision of EU access to justice rules is necessary in order to address the findings of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee. Potential impact on EU administrative and judicial systems ECPA believes that the proposed changes could expose EU systems to numerous objections, some of which have potential to be vexatious, with potential to affect the smooth functioning of…

LinkedInX
E

EODP.

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

European donors active in Europe’s southern neighbouring countries, in the framework of the AA and ENP and in environmental matters. Do they undertake to ensure that the rights of vulnerable groups are respected when carrying out projects which they co-finance?

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CF

Centre for International and Business Law

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

The EU has on numerous occasions expressed the desire to be the global leader in responding to climate change and in implementing obligations stemming from international climate change conventions and agreements. It has taken important steps in that direction including the adoption of the European Green Deal.

LinkedInX
LS

Landwirtschaftskammer Österreich

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

In the opinion of the Austrian Chamber of Agriculture, there are fundamental concerns about this draft: • New scope threatens legal certainty The proposal provides that environmental NGOs may in future also challenge administrative acts of general interest. The definition covers all administrative acts, irrespective of their policy objectives or legal bases.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AW

ANP|WWF

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

Delivery of the Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance in practice, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver for the environment and human health.

LinkedInX
SD

Södra

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Response to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention Södra would like to provide the following comments on behalf of our 53 000 forest owners and demonstrate our support for CEPF´s views on the following issues.

LinkedInX
FO

Federation of Swedish Family Forest Owners

· · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

The Federation of Swedish Family Forest Owners, LRF Forestry, response to the Proposal for an amending Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention The general principles of the Aarhus Convention (AC) are important.

LinkedInX
AD

AGDW- die Waldeigentümer

· · filed 9 Dec 2020 · source

The general principles of the Aarhus Convention (AC) are important. However, there is no indication in the AC background papers or in other primary legal sources of the interpretation put forward by the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC), which allows any group or group that identifies itself as a stakeholder to participate in administrative, legal or other processes involving an environmental aspect…

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AF

Austrian Federal Economic Chamber

· · filed 9 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

The proposal to amend the existing EU Aarhus Regulation (1367/EC/2006) aims at extending the rights to seek administrative review of administrative acts of EU institutions (delegated acts, implementing acts and decisions) for environmental NGOs: - Extension to "general acts": While currently a review procedure can only be requested for acts of "individual scope" (this means for acts directly addressed to a legal…

LinkedInX
C

ClientEarth

· · filed 9 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

Delivery of the Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance in practice, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver for the environment and human health.

LinkedInX
EF

European Forum for Restorative Justice

· · filed 9 Dec 2020 · source

The European Forum for Restorative Justice (EFRJ) encourages the use of Restorative Justice (RJ) methods and values also in the environmental sector. When an offense against the environment is at stake, the harm involves many people and/or the entire community.

LinkedInX
NS

Norra Skog ekonomisk förening

· · filed 9 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

Norra Skog would like to provide the following comments on behalf of the 27 000 northern Swedish forest owners who we represent. We response to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention.

LinkedInX
FP

Forestiers Privés de France

· · filed 8 Dec 2020 · source

The Federation of Private Forestry (Fransylva) considers the principles of the Aarhus Convention to be important, but does not see them in line with the interpretation put forward by the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee stating that there is a fundamental right for any person or group to take part in administrative processes, reviews and judicial proceedings in all matters with an environmental dimension.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EA

EnBW AG

· · filed 8 Dec 2020 · source

With the UmwRG, which was extensively amended in 2017, Germany has all the directives in nat. Law implemented. Calls for the correct implementation of EU secondary legislation to be ensured (paragraphs 31 and 32) and for a review of the national legislation. Legislation by the Member States themselves (paragraph 36) is therefore sufficient.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
IN

IHK Nord

· · filed 8 Dec 2020 · source

In the light of the results of the study on the implementation of the Aarhus Convention presented in October 2019 and the next Conference of the Parties in 2021, the CCI North is critical of adjustments to the Aarhus Regulation in order to fulfil the EU’s contractual obligations as a member of the Aarhus Convention.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CO

Confederation of European Forest Owners

· · filed 8 Dec 2020 · source

PDF

The general principles of the Aarhus Convention (AC) are important. However, CEPF has not found support in the AC’s background papers or any primary source of law for the interpretation persistently put forward by the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC) which implies a right for basically anyone or any group, that identifies themselves as being a stakeholder, to take part in administrative processes…

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 79 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.