Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2022/0347(COD) · In Force

Ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Recast

104 submissions from 87 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 123 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 104 from organizations. Not shown: 18 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 1 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →

Committee ENVIRapporteur Javi López (S&D)
  1. Published in the Official Journal · 20 Nov 2024
  2. Signed · 23 Oct 2024
  3. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 14 Oct 2024
  4. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 18 Jun 2024
  5. EP position at first reading · 24 Apr 2024

Who showed up

46 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 39 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 46Civil society 39Public authorities, academia, other 18

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice. An identical text filed by several organizations counts once: 1 submission here repeats one text word for word and is folded into it.

What the room declares

49 of 87
in the EU Register
439
full-time lobbying staff
€53.0M+
declared costs a year
250
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 14 Mar 2023 — it ran from 27 Oct 2022.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
ENVI
Commission reference
COM(2022)542

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep14 Jan 2021
  2. Public consultation16 Dec 2021
  3. Prop dir14 Mar 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 104 submissions.

NN

NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

FEEDBACK ON AIR QUALITY REVISION OF EU RULES Submitted to https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12677Air-quality-revision-of-EU-rules Submitted on 14 March 2023 Submitted by Leonor Tarrason User type Academic/research Institution Organization NILU Organization size Medium (50 to 249 employees) Country of origin Norway Initiative Air quality - revision of EU rules NILU appreciates…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
S

SUEZ

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Air Pollution is a critical point to address and SUEZ supports the new revision and its alignment with the WHO recommendations. Reducing air pollution helps to put the EU on a trajectory to achieve zero pollution for air at the latest by 2050, in synergy with climate-neutrality efforts.

LinkedInX
E

Eurometaux

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Recommendations on the New Air Quality Directive The European Non-Ferrous Metal (NFM) sector welcomes the new Proposal for an Air Quality Directive and the opportunities to provide feedback. The NFM sector is strongly committed to continuing lowering emissions of air pollutants for the benefit of human health and the environment.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
A

ACEA

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Comments to the public consultation on the Commission proposal for ambient air quality standards March 2023 Key Points: • Future air quality limits must be assessed on the basis of a full risk assessment and risk management process. • Any new sector-specific measures need time to deliver their intended benefits before new air quality limits values could apply.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
OS

Ocelářská unie a.s.

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

We welcome the opportunity to express our views and comments on the draft revision of AAQD. BeLOW please find some of our main points, while in the Attachement further comments on individual Articles can be found. Alignment of the future EU AQ standards with technical and economic feasibility must be a key principle of the Directive.

Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BB

Bundesverband Bioenergie e.V.

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

On 26 October 2022, the European Commission presented its proposal to revise the EU Air Quality Directive (2008/50/EC). This Directive lays down methods for monitoring and assessing ambient air quality as well as limit values and objectives to prevent, reduce or at best avoid the impact of poor air quality on human health and the environment.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RL

Regione Lombardia

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Improving air quality and achieving ever-lower concentrations of pollutants is a fundamental ambition for the protection of citizens health by European, national, and local institutions. Anyway, reaching near-zero limits in a limited time, is extremely complex.

LinkedInX
EC

European Copper Institute

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The European Copper Institute welcomes the opportunity to provide its feedback into the revision of the Directive 2004/107/EC and the Directive 2008/50/EC (Ambient Air Quality Directives). Copper plays a leading role in the EUs transition to a climate-neutral and digital economy.

LinkedInX
BB

BDEW Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e. V.

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The German energy industry represented by the Federal Association of Energy and Water Management (Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft BDEW e.V.) has been working successfully to improve air quality for many years.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
NE

Norwegian Environment Agency

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

European Commission Directorate-General for Environment 1049 Brussel BELGIUM Your ref.: COM(2022) 542 final 2022/0347 (COD) Oslo, 14.03.2023 Our ref. (incl. when replying): 2014/3343 Case officer: Scott Randall Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe Feedback from the Norwegian Environment Agency The Norwegian Environment Agency has…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
ER

European Respiratory Society

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

European Respiratory Society (ERS) Response to Consultation - EU Ambient Air Quality Directive The European Respiratory Society (ERS) appreciates the efforts made by the European Commission on the proposal for a revised EU Ambient Air Quality Directive (AAQD).

LinkedInX
AF

Association for District Heating of the Czech Republic

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Association for District Heating of the Czech Republic (ADH CR) welcomes opportunity to comment on the Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast). Please find detailed comments in the Attachment.

LinkedInX
EC

EMEP Chemical Coordinating Centre

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

This comment was prepared by the EMEP-CCC, with input from the Chair of EMEP TFMM. The EMEP monitoring strategy specifies the requirements for the monitoring activities of the Parties to EMEP: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/ECE_EB.AIR_144_Add.1-2001542%20%28E%29_0.pdf (valid for 2020-2029).

LinkedInX
DU

Deutsche Umwelthilfe

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) welcomes the fact, that the revision process of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (AAQD) resulted in a proposal of the European Commission to strengthen air quality standards in the European Union. Unfortunately, the draft of the Commission lacks ambition.

LinkedInX
EC

European Cancer Organisation

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The European Cancer Organisation (ECO) welcomes the European Commission proposal on the Directive on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Clean air is vital for human health, and although the European Union (EU) has recorded worrying figures in this respect in recent years, ECO is pleased to note the joint efforts of the EU and national and local authorities to reduce the harmful impacts of air pollution…

LinkedInX
AD

Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil-Club e.V.

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

With currently more than 21 million members, ADAC e.V. is the largest automobile club in Europe and the second largest in the world. The four letters in its name stand for an association which offers its members assistance, protection and advice around the clock and is a powerful stakeholder on all mobility issues.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
PO

Pegasor Oy

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

Pegasor welcomes the revision of the European air quality directive and the target to update it to match the recommendations of WHO. Very important part of the revision is to include particle number (PN) monitoring as part of the routine monitoring requirements for environmental authorities. This will have a significant impact on the air quality and the safety of the people in urban environments.

LinkedInX

The European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients Associations (EFA) considers the revision of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directives (AAQD) as a crucial step to correct existing shortcomings and gaps in the current air quality legislative framework which lead to the development of allergy and respiratory disease and cause 300,000 deaths annually.

LinkedInX
FC

France Chimie

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

France Chimie does not express a view on the objectives of the Directive, but wishes to share the efforts made by the industry to reduce their air emissions and thus contribute to improving air quality. Chemistry is a major player in the French, European and global economy. The impact of its activities is real: the vast majority of production units emit pollutants by their air emissions.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EA

EURACOAL aisbl

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The European coal industry is subject to strict EU pollution control legislation and has successfully implemented this to meet some of the worlds highest standards. The coal sector has invested heavily in pollution control technologies and achieved impressive results for example, sulphur dioxide (SO2) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions from coal use in the EU have fallen by between 60% and 90% since 1990.

LinkedInX
FD

Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) European Bureau

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

The FIA European Bureau is fully committed to clean mobility and supports the goal of progressively improving air quality in the European Union to levels no longer considered harmful to human health and natural ecosystems. However, and in view of establishing clear and achievable European requirements, the expression zero pollution objective should not be used in the Ambient Air Quality Directives.

LinkedInX
E

Enel

· · filed 14 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Enel strongly welcomes the Commissions proposal for the revision of the Ambient Air Quality Directives, as air quality is the number one environmental and health problem in Europe and the quality of air Europeans breathe is still far from complying with European or international standards.

LinkedInX
HS

HEALTH SERVICE EXECUTIVE (HSE)

· · filed 13 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

HSE PHMEHG strongly support the review of the revision of EU Ambient Air Quality Directives (AAQDs). Within EU, the standards are currently heterogeneous, and do create health inequities, and will urgently need to be rectified before full alignment with newly proposed WHO recommendations. HSE PHMEHG recommends: 1. The introduction of homogenous ambient air quality monitoring across Europe. 2.

LinkedInX
AA

AURUBIS AG

· · filed 13 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Aurubis is a leading worldwide provider of non-ferrous metals. We process complex metal concentrates and diverse recycling raw materials. Aurubis is a global leader in copper recycling. We welcome the opportunity to comment on the revision of the Ambient Air Quality Directives. Air quality affects our health and our quality of life. Our industry is therefore fully committed to contributing to clean air.

LinkedInX
WW

WKÖ, Wirtschaftskammer Österreich (engl. Austrian Federal Economic Chamber)

· · filed 13 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Site relevance is high The site relevance of the Air Quality Directive, which has been revised for the first time since 2008 and is being developed in the direction of the most recent extremely stringent WHO recommendations of September 2021, is high. Where exceedances occur permanently, there is considerable pressure on the Länder governments to define air remediation areas in accordance with the IG-L.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 104 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.