Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2023/0210(COD) · Council Adoption

Payment services in the internal market

53 submissions from 52 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 58 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 53 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee ECONRapporteur René Repasi (S&D)
  1. Committee Approved the Provisional Agreement · 5 May 2026
  2. Approval of the provisional agreement with the Council by the EP committee responsible · 5 May 2026
  3. Adoption of draft report · 5 May 2026
  4. Endorsement of the provisional agreement by Coreper · 22 Apr 2026
  5. Meeting — Trilogue (2nd reading) · 26 Nov 2025

Who showed up

46 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 15.3 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 46Civil society 3Public authorities, academia, other 4

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

32 of 52
in the EU Register
153
full-time lobbying staff
€22.1M+
declared costs a year
76
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 1 Nov 2023 — it ran from 30 Jun 2023.

Policy area
Financial services (DG FISMA)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Council Adoption
Lead committee
ECON
Commission reference
COM(2023)367

How it got here

  1. Proposal for a regulation1 Nov 2023

53 positions · showing 25

EM

Electronic Money Association

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

The Electronic Money Association (EMA), established in 2001, is the trade body for European and UK Crypto Assets Providers (CASPs), Payment Institutions (PIs), E-Money Institutions (EMIs), and Credit Institutions (CIs) providing innovative payments.

LinkedInX
AF

Association française des Sociétés Financières

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

In France, lassociation des Sociétés Financières (ASF) represents in France the activities of financing specialising in credit and in financial and investment services. Its 270 members are active in the service of businesses and professionals (factoring, leasing of furniture and real estate, financing of energy) and households (consumer credit and housing credit).

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ED

European Digital Finance Association

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

European Digital Finance Association (EDFA) welcomes the opportunity to share its position on the EU payment services legislative package presented by the European Commission on 28th June 2023. EDFA hopes that the proposals will help to further level the playing field between bank and non-bank payment providers, as well as modernise and enhance the resilience and competitiveness of the payment sector.

LinkedInX
AE

American Express

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

American Express (Amex) welcomes the proposed Payments Services Package introduced by the European Commission (EC) in June 2023, as these proposed changes will help to foster innovation, strengthen competition, and secure safer payments. Overall, this package marks an important step towards harmonizing payment standards across the EU.

LinkedInX
OF

Open Finance Association

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

The Open Finance Association (OFA) welcomes the European Commissions proposal on payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (PSR) and the proposal on the third Directive on payment services and electronic money services in the Internal Market (PSD3). We support the Commissions approach of a natural evolution to the current rules in the second Payments Services Directive (PSD2).

LinkedInX
SS

SIBS SGPS

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

SIBS welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback and contribute to the European Commissions legislative proposal for a Regulation on payment services (PSR), which is part of the package to review the current legal framework (PSD2).

LinkedInX
AO

Association of Foreign Banks in Germany

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

Please find attached the Position Paper of the Association of Foreign Banks in Germany (VAB) of 1 November 2023 on the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 [COM (2023) 367 / Procedure 2023/0210/COD].

LinkedInX
FD

Finance Denmark

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

Finance Denmark welcomes the Commissions Proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the internal market (PSR). We have the following comments to the proposal: Open banking The Commission proposes to continue PSD2's principle that; account servicing payment service providers should allow access by providers of open banking services to payment account data and that this should take place in a non-contractual…

LinkedInX
CE

CharIN e.V.

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

In Attachment: CharIN e.V. Position Paper with full explanation. Executive Summary In light of the European Commission's ongoing review of the Payment Services Directive (PSD2) with its proposals issued on June 28th, 2023, and the relevant request for feedback, we welcome the opportunity to address emerging challenges in the context of the implementation of the EU Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR)…

LinkedInX
SB

Swedish Bankers' Association

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

1 (3) The Swedish Bankers' Association's response to the European Commission’s proposal for changes in the regulatory framework for payment services Swedish Bankers’ Association welcomes the opportunity to provide the European Commission with its comments on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services in the internal market (PSR proposal).

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
PC

Polish Confederation Lewiatan

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

COMMENTS OF THE POLISH CONFEDERATION LEWIATAN ON THE PROPOSAL FOR PSD3 AND PSR In connection with the legislative work on Proposal for a Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council on payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (hereinafter PSR) and Proposal for a Directive Of The European Parliament And Of The Council on payment services and electronic money…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
IP

International Personal Finance (IPF)

· · filed 1 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

IPF hopes that the proposals will help to further level the playing field between bank and non-bank payment providers, as well as modernise and enhance the resilience and competitiveness of the payment sector. For the upcoming legislative procedure, IPF urges lawmakers in the European Parliament and the Council to use the revision of PSD2 as an opportunity to avoid excessive requirements and increased bureaucracy.

LinkedInX
B

Bolt

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

PSR art 2(2)(b) proposes to narrow down commercial agent exemption. As a result many marketplaces would have to obtain a payment services license (or arrange sellers to hand payments over to licensed providers), which is likely to reduce availability of digital payment methods for both buyers and sellers. Related payments' specific risk is low and not worth regulatory resources.

LinkedInX
BS

Banca Sella Holding S.p.A.

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

First, we welcome the decision to introduce a regulation that includes provisions on payment services, transparency, and rights and obligations, consistent with the regulators' intention to create a level playing field for PSPs at the European level.

LinkedInX
LN
PDF

Comment on Article 59 of the PSR1 proposal: The PSR1 proposal identifies an error in PSD2: in a context of fraud, the diffuse difference between authorised and unauthorised transactions, owing to a defect in consent or even lack of consent. However, it seeks to amend it in Article 59 in a way which, in our view, is contrary to the principles of law.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
LN
PDF

Comment on Article 55 of the PSR1 Proposal It is positive that the proposed Regulation is not unrealistic and addresses in the preamble one of the biggest problems faced by payment service providers: the disproportion and high financial cost they bear when opening each fraudulent transaction, whether authorised or not, to a systematic reimbursement right in cases of impersonation, see recital 79.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EC

EBA CLEARING

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

As the private sector operator of the pan-European SEPA payment systems STEP2-T and RT1, EBA CLEARING welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Payment Services Regulation. For your consideration, in the attachment, EBA CLEARING has suggested specific amendments to the proposal wording, along with the reasoning behind each proposed amendment.

LinkedInX
UD

Universidad de Zaragoza

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

My name is Andrea Castillo Olano. I am a doctorate in commercial law and for the last 4 and a half years I have investigated the legal status of payment services in both Spain and Europe. Please find in the attached document my comments on the Proposal for a Payment Services Regulation, based on the findings and conclusions of this enquiry.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
M

Mastercard

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

Mastercard welcomes the Commission's legislative proposal on PSR, and its ambition to improve upon the existing PSD2 regime. We welcome the measures aimed at making the payment ecosystem even more resilient to fraud, and also the initiatives to further streamline the Open Banking ecosystem.

LinkedInX
GE

GSMA Europe

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

GSMA Feedback to the European Commission’s Proposal on Payment Services in the Internal Market This document presents the inputs from the GSMA to the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 open feedback period.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
ET

European Third Party Providers Association - ETPPA

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

ETPPA has contributed heavily to the European Commissions review of PSD2, and we are pleased to see that some of our recommendations have been reflected in the proposed package published on June 28. ETPPA strongly supports the Commissions proposal to review PSD2 and is pleased to see the Commissions vision to reaffirm open banking in Europe.

LinkedInX
F

Febelfin

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

Febelfin, the Federation of the Belgian Financial Sector, has assessed the Commissions proposal for a Payment Services Regulation in detail and welcomes some necessary updates that can ensure that the legislative framework reflects the current state of the payments market, provided that some important elements are integrated, most notably on fraud (prevention) and liability and open banking.

LinkedInX
AN

Asociación Española de Economía Digital (Adigital)

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

The European Commission presented a Payments Package to bring payments and the wider financial sector into the digital age, including a proposal for a Payment Services Regulation (PSR). Adigital welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the EU Commissions proposal on Financial Data Access and revision of the Payments Services Directive (PSD2).

LinkedInX
C

CAPS

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

Dear Sir/Madam, we ask you to find the points of satisfaction with this proposal and also our concerns about the effects of the various new provisions in the attached document. We would like to draw the attention of the European Commission to some crucial points for a more effective and balanced implementation of the proposals.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BB

BDEW Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e. V.

· · filed 31 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

Berlin, 27 October 2023 BDEW Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V. [address removed] www.bdew.de BDEW Position Paper Payment Service Regulation (PSR III) The German Association of Energy and Water Industries (BDEW) and its regional organisations represent over 2,000 companies. The membership comprises both privately and publicly owned companies at the local, regional and national level.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 53 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.