Industry association · Spain · EU Transparency Register 785157016077-28
16
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
14
legislative files
of 665 tracked
14
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #233 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
European Banking Federation (EBF), FELABAN.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Asociación Española de Banca (AEB)
Head office
Madrid, Spain
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Spanish Banking Association? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Spanish Banking Association filed 16 positions between 21 Jun 2018 and 17 Sept 2026, across 14 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 14 times.
11th May 2022 EU Data Act Comments March 2022 ______________________________________________________________ The Spanish Banking Association welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commission's feedback period on the Data Act & amended rules on the legal protection of databases. Our main comments on the proposal are set out below. I.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
June 2018 SPANISH BANKING ASSOCIATION COMMENTS ON COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) AMENDING REGULATION (EU) 2017/565 SUPPLEMENTING DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL AS REGARDS ORGANISATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR INVESTMENT FIRMS AND DEFINED TERMS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THAT DIRECTIVE PROPOSAL Spanish Banking Association shares the European Commission Action Plan…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
5 May 2021 AEB position on the Proposal for a Regulation on a Digital Markets Act Introduction The Spanish Banking Association (AEB) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposal for the Regulation on the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Digital platforms have grown rapidly in the last decade.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
We welcome the EC´s report on the competitiveness of the EU banking sector as an important step towards a more efficient, proportionate and growth-oriented regulatory framework. The report rightly recognizes that financial stability and competitiveness are complementary objectives and provides a solid basis for strengthening the capacity of EU banks to finance investment, innovation and economic growth.
Spanish Banking Association (AEB) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the union retail investor protection rules and the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 1286/2014 as regards…
Spanish Banking Association (AEB) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the union retail investor protection rules and the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 1286/2014 as regards…
CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON REDUCING ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS II. Obstacles identified A. Level playing field 1. Divergent transposition of maximum harmonization directives. The national implementation of MiFID II, IDD, the Consumer Credit Directive (CCD II) and the Payment Accounts Directive (PAD) has generated asymmetric regimes between Member States, to the detriment of a level playing field and the homogeneous protection…
The Spanish Banking Association (AEB) welcomes the European Commission proposal for the EU transposition of the “Basel III: Finalizing post-crisis reform” standard. AEB acknowledge the efforts made by the EU regulators to achieve several goals such as: - Reducing the impact in terms of capital requirement which will foster the efficiency of the EU banking sector.
The following measures are to be considered in the action plan to tackle the problems identified by the Commission. Please find attached a full answer. 0. Regulatory approach recap The push for immediacy and frictionless onboarding must be balanced against heightened fraud risks and current prevention capabilities.
The Spanish Banking Association (AEB in its acronym) welcomes the opportunity to provide comments in the context of the public participation process on the Regulation amending the SEPA Regulation and the Regulation on cross-border payments as regards instant credit transfers.
The Impact Assessment establishes several objectives: "making cross-border payments easier, faster and cheaper", "ensuring citizens and companies have high quality, secure and cost-efficient payment solutions to make all their payments, both domestically and cross-border”, "reduce fragmentation in the internal market, sovereignty in payment solutions".
The Spanish Banking Association (AEB) welcomes the importance assigned to fraud in the proposal of Payment Services Regulation. It enhances the need to prevent fraud (PSPs are very concern about it and take most and probably more measures than those prescribed).
We very much appreciate the European Commissions consultation paper to review the treatment of securitisations under the liquidity coverage ratio in order to foster the role of bank treasuries as investors of this instrument. The strengthening of the demand side of securitisations will lead to a more competitive securitisation market and, ultimately, to benefits to lending to the EU economy.
CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON TARGETED AMENDMENT ON THE PRUDENTIAL TREATMENT OF SECURITIES FINANCING TRANSACTIONS UNDER THE NSFR The Spanish banking Association (AEB hereinafter) welcome the possibility to participate in the call for evidence launched by the European Commission (EC) to make permanent the current transitory prudential treatment for securities financing transactions (SFT) and unsecured transactions with a…
The Spanish Banking Association welcomes the proposal for a regulation, considering that it addresses issues that are essential for the proper functioning of payment systems and securities settlement systems in the European Union.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Introduction. We fully support the BU. In this sense, we think that there is still room for improvement on the resolution framework, and this proposal goes in the right direction. However, we think that it is key to reach an agreement on the third pillar (EDIS).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Spanish Banking Association next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Spanish Banking Association’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.