Febelfin, the Belgian Financial Sector Federation, endorses the position paper submitted by the European Banking Federation (EBF) on the SFDR Revision Proposal and calls on co-legislators to consider the EBFs recommended amendments. We share the EBFs overall positive assessment of the Commissions proposal and support its key recommendations.
Febelfin
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 1938561921-91
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #540 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Febelfin is lid van de European Banking Federation (EBF): http://www.ebf-fbe.eu/
- Febelfin is lid van de EU Roundtable of Financial Centres: https://eufcrt.com/
- Febelfin is lid van Leaseurope: https://www.leaseurope.org/
- Febelfin is lid van het forum van European Securities Associations (EFSA): https://efsa-securities.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Brussel, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Febelfin in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Febelfin? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Febelfin filed 3 positions between 31 Oct 2023 and 23 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Febelfin, the Federation of the Belgian Financial Sector, has assessed the Commissions proposal for a Payment Services Regulation in detail and welcomes some necessary updates that can ensure that the legislative framework reflects the current state of the payments market, provided that some important elements are integrated, most notably on fraud (prevention) and liability and open banking.
We generally view favourably the EC proposals for amending the eligibility conditions for securitisations in the liquidity buffer of credit institutions. Combined with the proposals regarding CRR and the Securitisation Regulation, they make it more attractive for banks to diversify the LCR portfolios towards securitisations in the Level 2B bucket.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Finance Denmark · 3 files in common
- German Banking Industry Committee · 3 files in common
- European Savings and Retail Banking Group · 3 files in common
- ABI - Italian Banking Association · 3 files in common
- European Association of Co-operative Banks (EACB) · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 14.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Febelfin’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.