Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
LND

Letrado nº 94.416 del Colegio de la Abogacia de Madrid

Other · Spain

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Letrado in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Letrado nº 94.416 del Colegio de la Abogacia de Madrid? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file Letrado nº 94.416 del Colegio de la Abogacia de Madrid engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from Letrado nº 94.416 del Colegio de la Abogacia de Madrid or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Letrado nº 94.416 del Colegio de la Abogacia de Madrid filed 2 positions on 31 Oct 2023, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

What they argued

Payment services in the internal marketfiled 31 Oct 2023PDFsource

Comment on Article 59 of the PSR1 proposal: The PSR1 proposal identifies an error in PSD2: in a context of fraud, the diffuse difference between authorised and unauthorised transactions, owing to a defect in consent or even lack of consent. However, it seeks to amend it in Article 59 in a way which, in our view, is contrary to the principles of law.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

Payment services in the internal marketfiled 31 Oct 2023PDFsource

Comment on Article 55 of the PSR1 Proposal It is positive that the proposed Regulation is not unrealistic and addresses in the preamble one of the biggest problems faced by payment service providers: the disproportion and high financial cost they bear when opening each fraudulent transaction, whether authorised or not, to a systematic reimbursement right in cases of impersonation, see recital 79.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Letrado nº 94.416 del Colegio de la Abogacia de Madrid’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.