Other · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 757388947637-84
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #638 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
4.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
3
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Digital Currencies Governance Group Limited (DCGG)
Head office
London, United kingdom
EU office
Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Digital Currencies Governance Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Digital Currencies Governance Group filed 5 positions between 29 Mar 2023 and 14 Oct 2025, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
Simplification – digital package and omnibus DCGG Response to the European Commission Call for Evidence About DCGG The Digital Currencies Governance Group (DCGG) is a trade association that represents digital assets issuers and service providers and artificial intelligence firms in the European Union, United Kingdom, Latin America, United Arab Emirates, Asia and Africa.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Digital Currencies Governance Group (DCGG) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Regulation for Financial Data Access (FIDA). Please find attached our comments. We would be delighted to discuss our response in more detail should there be any questions or points of clarification that may support your assessment.
The Digital Currencies Governance Group (DCGG) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission's proposal for a Payment Services Regulation (PSR). Please find attached our comments. We would be delighted to discuss our response in more detail should there be any questions or points of clarification that may support your assessment.
The Digital Currencies Governance Group (DCGG) and its members welcome the European Commissions efforts and objective to amend the Directive for Administrative Cooperation (henceforth, DAC8) to enhance the current tax system to create a more fair and transparent framework for EU member states, and facilitate compliance.
The Digital Currencies Governance Group (DCGG) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the revised Payment Services Directive (PSD3). Please find attached our comments. We would be delighted to discuss our response in more detail should there be any questions or points of clarification that may support your assessment.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Digital Currencies Governance Group next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Digital Currencies Governance Group’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.