Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
FSC

Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency

Public authority · Finland

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Finnish in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency filed 3 positions between 21 Mar 2025 and 5 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Advanced Materials Actfiled 13 Jan 2026source

The Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency (Tukes) would like to thank the Commission for the opportunity to give feedback regarding the forthcoming proposal for a Regulation on Advanced Materials (AdMa). Our views are given from the perspective of the chemicals safety sector.

Evaluation of the Biocidal Products Regulationfiled 5 Mar 2026PDFsource

Response of the Finnish safety and chemicals agency (Tukes) to the Call for Evidence in the evaluation on the BPR Overall considerations The Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) has significantly improved the harmonisation of risk assessment, approval and authorisation procedures for active substances and biocidal products across the EU.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulationfiled 21 Mar 2025source

The Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency considers that the Cosmetic Products Regulation has worked positively towards safety of human health when prohibiting or restricting use of certain harmful substances. The system for communication of serious undesirable effects has enabled quick actions across Member States.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 10.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.