The EU cosmetic legislation has failed to increase consumer safety regarding acrylate-based artificial nail products the use of which carries a risk of acrylate contact allergy. Contact allergy is permanent and may have adverse health effects on the consumer beyond the inability to use acrylic nails anymore.
FIO
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Academic / research · Finland
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 583 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Finnish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Finnish Institute of Occupational Health? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health filed 3 positions between 21 Mar 2022 and 7 Mar 2025, across 3 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2022 · 2 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
HBM4EU is a joint effort of 28 countries, the European Environment Agency and the European Commission, co-funded under Horizon 2020. The initiative is coordinating and advancing human biomonitoring (HBM) in Europe. HBM4EU is generating evidence of the actual exposure of citizens to chemicals and the possible health effects in order to support policy making.
When revising the asbestos OEL it is of outmost importance to specify the width of fibres the OEL relates to. The RAC opinion clearly states that also thinner (<0.2 µm) fibres are carcinogenic and should be considered when measuring asbestos exposure.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Finnish Institute of Occupational Health next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 9.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Finnish Institute of Occupational Health’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.