Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain
22 submissions from 22 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 32 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 22 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
CommitteeAGRIRapporteurStefano Bonaccini (S&D)
Publication in the Official Journal · 17 Apr 2026
Publication in the Official Journal · 16 Apr 2026
Publication in the Official Journal · 15 Apr 2026
Publication in the Official Journal · 14 Apr 2026
Publication in the Official Journal · 13 Apr 2026
Who showed up
10 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 7 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 10Civil society 7Public authorities, academia, other 5
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
What the room declares
13 of 22
in the EU Register
62
full-time lobbying staff
€4.9M+
declared costs a year
65
EP accreditations declared
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 10 Mar 2025 — it ran from 13 Jan 2025.
From an initial analysis, the document does not contain any significant criticism. However, with regard to national application and the other unfair practices recognised by the various Member States when implementing the Directive, combating such practices at transnational level by using the sole instrument of requesting information may lead to a reduction in supranational law enforcement.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
UNAPROA - National fruit, vegetables, citrus fruit and nuts Organisation in Italy brings together the Producers' Organisations (POs) of fruit and vegetables. Our main tasks are to understand the market, to carry out projects to improve production and marketing, and generally to defend the interests of our members (Pos and APOs).
Tuttavia, rispetto allapplicazione nazionale e alle ulteriori pratiche sleali riconosciute dai vari Stati Membri in fase di implementazione della direttiva, contrastare tali pratiche a livello transnazionale il avvalendosi del solo strumento della richiesta di informazioni può comportare un depotenziamento del contrasto sovranazionale.
AIM, the European Brands Association, welcomes and supports the European Commissions proposed Regulation to enhance cross-border enforcement against unfair trading practices (UTPs) in the EU. This initiative marks a significant step towards ensuring greater fairness and transparency in the consumer goods supply chain.
Agricultural cooperation is the representation of agricultural cooperatives in France. For the record, in France, agricultural cooperatives collect around 70 % of agricultural production and 3 out of 4 farmers join at least one of the 11400 cooperatives using agricultural equipment and 2100 agricultural cooperatives. Please find enclosed LCA’s contribution to this consultation.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The FNSEA supports the initiative to improve cooperation between national authorities responsible for implementing Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in the agricultural and food supply chain. This Directive marked a step forward by recognising the existence of a structural imbalance between agricultural producers and buyers in trade negotiations.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
EuroCommerce supports better enforcement against unfair trading practices, but the co-legislators must ensure there are safeguards to preserve the Single Market for sourcing and legal certainty. We call on the co-legislators to: - Keep the proposed Regulation focused on cooperation between enforcement authorities based on the existing unfair trading practices and thresholds in Directive (EU) 2019/633 (UTP…
FoodDrinkEurope, representing the EU food and drink industries, welcomes and supports the European Commissions proposed Regulation to enhance cross-border enforcement against unfair trading practices (UTPs) in the EU.
Opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain: Austria welcomes in principle the efforts to improve cooperation between authorities in the field of unfair trading…
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Fairtrade Poland welcomes the European Commissions efforts to regulate the conditions under which terms such as fair or equitable and their equivalents may be used, thereby avoiding misleading claims. We would like to emphasize that economic operators within the Fair Trade movement already adhere to relevant standards.
The Danish Chamber of Commerce welcome the opportunity to provide comments on the Commissions proposal for a regulation (the Proposal) on cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in businessto- business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain (the UTP-Directive), published on the Have your say platform on 13…
Oxfam welcomes the European Commissions 2024 proposal to strengthen cross-border cooperation among enforcement authorities in the implementation of the Unfair Trading Practices (UTP) Directive. This initiative is a positive step toward improving enforcement and protecting farmers against UTPs.
CEJA welcomes the regulation proposal on cooperation among the enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of the UTP Directive published by the European Commission on 10 December 2024 and the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft act.
Independent Retail Europe takes note of the proposal and concludes after thorough examination that further clarification of certain legal provisions is needed to ensure the Regulation does not risk undermining the European single market.
The Rurale Coordination (CR) thanks the European Commission for its proposal for a Regulation to strengthen cooperation in enforcing the rules on unfair trading practices (UTP) in the agri-food supply chain. The BoA welcomes the developments brought about by the Regulation, but considers that this first interesting step should not be the only one in the reflection on TPUs.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The FTAO welcomes the European Commissions proposal to boost cross-border enforcement of the EU Directive on unfair trading practices in the agricultural and food supply chain via a regulation that shall complement the Directive in question. However, the FTAO is dismayed to see that a measure established to facilitate cross-border complaints makes no reference to complaints from suppliers outside the EU.
Spain is a pioneer in this type of regulation to regulate Unfair Commercial Practices in the market and to ensure that it functions better. The aim of this regulation is to avoid the abuse of some companies over others, especially those of agricultural and livestock producers, in commercial relations through its pioneering food chain law, amended in 2021.
We believe that reflection on the terms fair, equitable or equivalent terms and short distribution chain is essential. Further work of the Commission will be needed, to determine the roadmap and the approval of the implementing regulations provided for in Article 88a 3 in order to specify the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, letters a), b) and c), and paragraph 2, letters a) and b), taking into account any…
In the context of the European Commission’s consultation procedure on this matter, please find in the attached file the opinion of the Trade Mark Association on the European Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on cross-border cooperation between enforcement authorities for Directive 2019/633 on unfair trading practices. Yours sincerely, [name removed] e.V.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
More detailed regulation of products particularly vulnerable to unfair practices is needed. Honey is an example of such a product. A list of such products should be drawn up, which would benefit from increased attention. The scale of unfair practices concerning honey is very high in many countries of the European Union. The quantity of good product that ends up in the final consumer is too small.
Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission
The EU Commission tabled proposals on Unfair trading practices (UTP) at the end of 2024. However, they do not change the substance of the UTP Directive but refer to cooperation between Member States when it comes to cross-border unfair activities. It is, of course, important for Member State authorities to be well-placed to investigate and issue sanctions in cases of unfair trading practices.
One of the key priorities in the European agri-food sector is to ensure sufficient and stable market income for farmers. To this end, it is essential to put in place mechanisms to prevent unfair competition, both from outside and within the agri-food chain itself.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.