Consumer organization · Germany · EU Transparency Register 2157421414-31
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #336 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Markenverband in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Markenverband e.V.? so we know who speaks for it.
Markenverband e.V. filed 5 positions between 22 Nov 2017 and 20 Apr 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
The provisions of the Single Use Plastics Directive (EU) 2019/904 (SUPD) on extended producer responsibility are implemented very differently in the Member States. This not only leads to divergent costs of the measures set out in Article 8 of the SEAD, but also distorts competition and hampers the internal market, contrary to the objective of the SEAD.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
POSITION PAPER MARKENVERBAND INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FAIRNESS IN P2B RELATIONS Markenverband would like to thank the European Commission for having the chance to give a feedback on the inception impact assessment on fairness in platform-to-business relations.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Trademark Association welcomes the European Commission’s intentions to make efforts to combat unsafe and illegal products through the revision of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. With their brands, the members of the trade mark association believe in the high quality, safety and innovative solutions for consumers.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
In the context of the European Commission’s consultation procedure on this matter, please find in the attached file the opinion of the Trade Mark Association on the European Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on cross-border cooperation between enforcement authorities for Directive 2019/633 on unfair trading practices. Yours sincerely, [name removed] e.V.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The German Trademark Association welcomes the European Commission’s evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 on customs enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPR). From the point of view of brand companies, an effective and harmonised customs regime to protect intellectual property rights at the EU’s external borders is crucial to protect innovation, investment and consumer safety.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 15.
Everything on this page comes from Markenverband e.V.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.