Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
OXF

Oxfam

NGO · KEN · EU Transparency Register 46856801604-90

12
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
11
legislative files
of 665 tracked
10
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #99 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

6.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
6
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Oxfam EU is part of the Oxfam confederation: Link https://www.oxfam.org/en/what-we-do/about/how-we-are-organized
  • In addition to that, we are members of the following european networks:
  • CONCORD →
  • VOICE →
  • CAN Europe
  • HRDN
  • Finance Watch →
  • EDRi
  • ECRE →
  • EPLO
  • Eurodad
  • OECD Watch and EU-LAC Network

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
OXFAM INTERNATIONAL EU ADVOCACY OFFICE (OXFAM INTERNATIONAL)
Head office
BRUSSELS, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Oxfam in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Oxfam

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Oxfam? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Oxfam filed 12 positions between 1 Apr 2020 and 30 Apr 2026, across 11 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 10 times.

2020 · 1 filed2021 · 2 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 2 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 4 filed

What they argued

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 16 Nov 2021PDFsource

The EC proposal on CBAM risks to disproportionally affect developing countries, and, as a consequence, increase inequality and undermine the efforts of poor countries to become greener. The poorest and marginalized people are already the most hardly affected by the climate crisis and the least responsible for the CO2 emissions.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 1 Apr 2020PDFsource

Climate change is inextricably linked to economic inequality: it is a crisis that is driven by the greenhouse gas emissions of the ‘haves’ that hits the ‘have-nots’. Oxfam estimates of the scale of this inequality suggest that the poorest half of the global population – around 3.5 billion people – are responsible for only around 10% of total global emissions attributed to individual consumption.

Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainfiled 10 Mar 2025PDFsource

Oxfam welcomes the European Commissions proposal COM(2024)577, which aims to strengthen farmers positions through mandatory written contracts, cost-based pricing, and contract revision clauses. The initiative to define "fair" and "equitable" commercial relations is also appreciated but must align with Fair Trade principles and the International Fair Trade Chart to prevent "fairwashing." Oxfam emphasizes key Fair…

Simplification of the Union framework on direct taxationfiled 27 Mar 2026PDFsource

Oxfam supports the EUs effort to simplify its directives related to direct taxation but express concerns against using simplification to weaken anti-avoidance rules and narrowing Member State's tax base. The Omnibus should close loopholes, not widen them. You will find our full contribution in the attached document. This document covers the following points : 1.

Revision of EU rules on business-to-business unfair trading practices in the food supply chainfiled 26 Feb 2026PDFsource

Oxfam welcomes the review of the Directive on Unfair Trading Practices in the agricultural and food supply chain as a timely opportunity to strengthen an instrument that has already proven valuable in addressing power imbalances in the agri-food supply chain, but whose full potential remains untapped. 1) The most severe UTP remains out of the Directive's scope.

Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)filed 26 Jan 2023source

Oxfam strongly supports the proposal. We believe it is one of most powerful opportunities to reshape the EUs corporate tax framework, address aggressive tax competition in the EU and raise the ambitions of Pillar 1 and 2. In designing the BEFIT, Oxfam recommends that: - The allocation formula is based on tangible factors (employment, payroll, sales, assets) and excludes intangible assets.

Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (recast)filed 22 Jan 2026source

· We welcome the initiative to simplify and clarify reporting obligations under the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC), and potentially consolidate various provisions into a single Directive for greater clarity. · We note that recasting the DAC could help reduce the reporting burden on both large companies and SMEs, as well as tax administrations.

Fighting the use of shell entities and arrangements for tax purposesfiled 17 Jun 2021PDFsource

Oxfam strongly welcomes the initiative. The European Commission started addressing the problem of lack of real economic activity and substance economic presence in specific initiatives (e.g. state aid guidelines, fair taxation criteria in the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions) but there is a need of a comprehensive and binding instrument to limit the use of shell companies in the EU.

Minimum level of taxation for multinational groupsfiled 5 Apr 2022PDFsource

Oxfam closely followed the negotiations at the OECD Inclusive Framework and expressed its concerns about the lack of ambition and the unfairness of the global tax deal. Requests from low-income countries were poorly included and analyses show that the new rules benefit rich countries mainly.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Oxfam next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 78.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Oxfam’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.