Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2023/0177(COD) · In Force

Transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities

66 submissions from 65 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 93 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 66 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee ECONRapporteur Aurore Lalucq (S&D)
  1. Delegated act published: Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating provider - regulatory technical standards · 31 Aug 2026
  2. Delegated act published: Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating provider - regulatory technical standards · 31 Aug 2026
  3. Delegated act published: EU rules of procedure on fines and periodic penalty payments imposed to ESG rating providers · 29 Jul 2026
  4. Delegated act published: EU regulatory technical standard on the elements to be disclosed to the public and to users of ESG r · 27 Jul 2026
  5. Delegated act adopted: Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating provider - regulatory technical standards · 25 May 2026

Who showed up

47 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 12 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.9 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 47Civil society 12Public authorities, academia, other 7

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

35 of 65
in the EU Register
215
full-time lobbying staff
€37.5M+
declared costs a year
126
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 1 Sept 2023 — it ran from 15 Jun 2023.

Policy area
Financial services (DG FISMA)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
ECON
Commission reference
COM(2023)314

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment6 Jun 2022
  2. Proposal for a regulation1 Sept 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 66 submissions.

AO
PDF

IOSCO final report on ESG ratings published in Nov 2021 describes (p. 20): a lack of reporting can either lead providers to use industry averages, thereby possibly creating an incentive for poor performers not to report their information, or lead the provider to negatively assess the company. This common market practice calls industry averages or proxies, when they are simply fake data.

LinkedInX
SO

Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen - SOMO

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

Regulating the ESG industry is overdue given its increasing use clear evidence of grave and fundamental problems, and the serious abuse and confusion about what ESG ratings mean. The proposed Regulation will only tackle part of the problems by requiring more and better transparency, general quality requirements, measures to deal with conflicts of interest and inadequate corporate governance, as well as…

LinkedInX
BF

BETTER FINANCE

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

BETTER FINANCE position and recommendations The draft Regulation urgently needs to: expand protection provisions for retail investors against greenwashing; establish a minimum sustainability requirement for ESG ratings to ensure certain degree of harmonisation between providers going beyond transparency of methodology; include a requirement which can address conflicts of interest by integrating clearly labelled…

LinkedInX
SG

Scope Group

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

Scope Group welcomes the European Commissions initiative to regulate the ESG rating market and improve transparency. We believe that this will help establish credibility to investing aligned with ESG goals and contribute to tackling greenwashing practices. The Commissions proposal will go a long way toward enforcing high-quality standards and improving the usability of ESG ratings.

LinkedInX
IS

International Swaps and Derivatives Association

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) welcome the opportunity to comment on the European Commissions proposal on the transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities.

LinkedInX
ER

European Round Table for Industry (ERT)

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The latest call for evidence (June 2022) of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) confirmed that the market of ESG rating providers is very fragmented, with 59 providers being active in the EU. This fragmentation and proliferation results in a significant degree of heterogeneity in practices and methodologies as well as a low degree of comparability.

LinkedInX
TD

The Dutch Fund and Asset Management Association (DUFAS)

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

Executive summary DUFAS and its members welcomes the proposal for regulation on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities. ESG ratings and ESG data are important for asset managers. DUFAS and its members emphasize therefore the need for a well-functioning ESG ratings market that provides relevant, reliable, and comparable ESG ratings.

LinkedInX
M

MEDEF

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The Medef welcomed the Commission’s proposal for a regulation on the transparency and integrity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating activities. In addition to the need to foster sustainable investments recalled by the Commission, ESG ratings also help companies assess their value chain, the dynamics of which are increasing due diligence and due diligence requirements.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AF

Association Française de la Gestion Financière (AFG)

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

AFG welcomes the proposal by the European Commission for a regulation on the transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities and the opportunity to provide feedback. Indeed, the planned introduction of regulatory standards for ESG rating agencies and their rating activities appears suitable in a context where increased ESG integration in investment activities, including on…

LinkedInX
E

EcoVadis

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

EcoVadis endorses the intent of the European Commissions proposal to regulate the activities of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings providers. We welcome the introduction of regulation to improve the credibility of the ESG ratings sector - beyond its value-add in the financial sector.

LinkedInX
EB

European Banking Federation

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The European Banking Federation welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Have Your Say on the European Commission's proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities. We share our views in relation to the proposal in attachment.

LinkedInX
CR

CRIF Ratings

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The European Commission has opened for feedback on the proposal for a period of 8 weeks (from June 15th to September 1st 2023). All feedback received will be summarised by the European Commission and presented to the European Parliament and Council with the aim of feeding into the legislative debate.

LinkedInX
EF

European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA)

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations play a crucial role in asset managers' investment decisions for several reasons: Financial Impact. ESG factors can significantly affect a company's financial success and long-term viability, which in turn can impact investment returns. Investor Demand.

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of Cooperative Banks

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The European Association of Co-operative Banks (EACB) is the voice of the co-operative banks in Europe. It represents, promotes and defends the common interests of its 28 member institutions and of co-operative banks in general. Co-operative banks form decentralised networks which are subject to banking as well as co-operative legislation.

LinkedInX
ES

ENGIE SA

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

ENGIE welcomes and supports the draft European Regulation 2023/0177 which aims to improve the reliability, comparability and transparency of ESG ratings by introducing requirements for the methodological transparency of these ratings towards the public and customers, and by establishing a clear regulatory framework for the operation, governance and supervision of ESG rating agencies operating in the European Union.

LinkedInX
L

LSEG

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

Good quality ESG assessments are vital to support the transition to net-zero. LSEG is overall supportive of the Proposal which will allow for greater transparency in the market, without prescribing ESG assessment methodologies. This approach will contribute to a more effective allocation of capital to sustainable activities.

LinkedInX
A

Assogestioni

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

Assogestioni, the Italian asset management association, would like to express its full support to the European Commission with regards to the proposal of regulation ESG rating and would like to thank the EC for the opportunity to contribute to the development of said regulation.

LinkedInX
VF

Verband öffentlicher Versicherer

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The Association of Public Insurers welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to establish a legal framework for environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings. As the second largest German primary insurer with a strong regional presence, the Group strongly supports the objective of a more sustainable economy.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FD

Finance Denmark

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The importance of and need for credible and high-quality ESG ratings cannot be underestimated when it comes to ensuring an effective sustainable transition of society. In principle, ESG ratings can be just as important for the sustainable transition as traditional credit ratings are for the creditworthiness of different countries and financial institutions.

LinkedInX
P

PensionsEurope

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

PensionsEurope welcomes the European Commissions proposal on ESG ratings. This legislation provides many solutions to current market shortcomings, such as enhancing transparency on methodologies and operations, regulating conflict of interests, establishing rules for third-country providers, and providing specific measures for smaller ESG providers.

LinkedInX
AA

AFME (Association for Financial Markets in Europe)

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

AFMEs preliminary feedback aims to support the proposals objective to introduce transparency and governance requirements for ESG ratings providers aligned with the IOSCO recommendations. We highlight, from the perspective of bank and asset manager members as users, rated entities and regulated financial undertakings, that the scope of the proposal should not unintentionally capture products or activities of…

LinkedInX
C

CDP

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

CDP welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the above-mentioned proposal and commends the efforts taken by the European Commission to support the transition to a more sustainable financial market. In brief: - CDP supports policy initiatives that are aligned to IOSCOs principles of transparency, good governance, management of conflicts of interest, and systems and control.

LinkedInX
D

DK

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

Dear Sir or Madam, The German banking industry committee (GBIC) would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft regulation on the transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities. Please find attached our detailed remarks. Kind regards, [name removed] (on behalf of GBIC)

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of Public Banks

· · filed 1 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The Regulation, as proposed, is a step in the right direction in regulating the ESG ratings market and improve the quality of ratings but issues remain. We welcome that more transparency and reliability is being brought into the procedures regarding methodologies.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 66 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.