Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Digital Levy

35 submissions from 35 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 276 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 35 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

29 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 9.7 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 29Civil society 3Public authorities, academia, other 3

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

19 of 35
in the EU Register
112
full-time lobbying staff
€15.8M+
declared costs a year
93
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 12 Apr 2021 — it ran from 18 Jan 2021.

Policy area
Taxation & trade (DG TAXUD)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Jun 2021

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep11 Feb 2021
  2. Public consultation12 Apr 2021

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Prop dir.

Showing 25 of 35 submissions.

A

Allegro

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Allegro supports the goal of modernising current taxation rules in the view of digital economy developments, establishing a level playing field and ensuring that digital companies are fairly contributing to the societies where they do business. The Roadmap and OECD discussions one the matter provide for opportunity to achieve these goals.

LinkedInX
EB

European Banking Federation (EBF)

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

The problems of the initiative for an EU Digital Levy aims to tackle are the same that are at the basis of the work performed in the context of OECD BEPS action 1 and the latest OECD pillar 1 blueprint and of the EU DST proposal that was first issued in March 2018.

LinkedInX
II

IMPALA - Independent Music Companies Association

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

IMPALA represents over 5,000 European independent music companies, which account for more than 80% of all new releases and 80% of the sector's jobs. To be fit for the digital age, the EU has to revise its rules to ensure the European market is a place where companies compete on fair terms.

LinkedInX
TP

Transfer Pricing Services |TPS

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

Thank you for the opportunity to present our feedback. In our opinion, continuing with the digital levy initiative is likely to bring more negative than positive results for European businesses and consumers at the moment.

LinkedInX
IT

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

The European Commission has published an Inception Impact Assessment to receive feedback about a so-called Digital Levy to be introduced as a legislative proposal later in 2021. Following the Special Meeting of the European Council on July 21, 2020, the head of States and governments of the European Union suggested joint recovery efforts from the Covid-19 crisis.

LinkedInX
BC

Booking.com

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Booking.com takes note of the Commission’s intention to explore a digital levy as an “own-resource” for the purposes of recovery from the Covid-19 crisis and to support a more stable medium-term outlook. While work on this initiative is still at very early stages, it cannot and should not be seen in isolation from OECD efforts and national initiatives on digital services taxes (DST).

LinkedInX
AI

ActionAid International

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

ActionAid welcomes the EC’s commitment to ensuring fairer taxation of the digital economy. Big tech companies are clearly not paying their fair share of tax, neither in the EU or in developing countries where tax revenue is desperately needed to pay for gender responsive public services, including basic services such as education and health care.

LinkedInX
FO

Federation of European Publishers

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

The Federation of European Publishers welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the roadmap on a digital levy. We fully support the Commission's to design a modern, stable regulatory and tax framework to appropriately address the developments and challenges of the digital economy.

LinkedInX
D

Deliveroo

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Hi there - Please find attached a response from Deliveroo. Best wishes and please don't hesitate to be in touch with any questions. Nick Hargrave Public Affairs Director, Global Deliveroo, The River Building, 1 Cousin Lane, London, EC4R 3TE deliveroo.co.uk | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

LinkedInX
A

AMETIC

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

AMETIC has fervently defended that the fiscal challenges derived from the globalization of the economy should be debated and agreed upon at the international level, within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), avoiding unilateral solutions that place Europe in a position of clear competitive disadvantage, reducing the interest to attract investment and penalize innovation and business…

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of Co-operative Banks (EACB)

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

The European Association of Cooperative Banks (EACB) gladly takes the opportunity to comment on EC roadmap consultation on the taxation of the digital economy following its comments on the OECD Pillar I and II consultations on the same issue. The EACB welcomes the EC plans on the taxation of the digital Economy.

LinkedInX
C

CIMA

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

CIMA is part of the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants alongside the AICPA. The taxation of digital transactions in a cross-border context presents several challenges to the concepts of the right to tax and the allocation of profits between countries.

LinkedInX
IE

Insurance Europe

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Insurance Europe welcomes the possibility to comment on the roadmap for the introduction of a digital tax to address the issue of fair taxation of the digital economy. Key points - While data is important for insurers and reinsurers, and they use data from different sources, (re)insurance is not a highly digitalised business model.

LinkedInX
E

EuroCommerce

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

To make the tax system suitable for the digitalised economy, EuroCommerce calls for the modernisation of existing international tax rules, consistent with the following principles: Fair - A modern taxation system should be channel-neutral and operate equitably across industries and between different forms of business activities and business models.

LinkedInX
IA

Interactive Advertising Bureau Poland

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Interactive Advertising Bureau Poland (IAB Poland) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commision’s consultation process on introduction of modern, stable regulatory and tax framework to respond to the developments and challenges of the digital economy. Attached we present our position paper

LinkedInX
U

Uber

· · filed 11 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Uber thanks the European Commission for the opportunity to provide comments on the Inception Impact Assessment for the proposed Digital Levy. Uber has been, and will continue to be, an active participant throughout the global digital taxation debate and has provided key recommendations regarding the design of a global solution.

LinkedInX
E

Europex

· · filed 10 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Europex, the Association of European Energy Exchanges, supports the Commission’s overall objective to ensure a fair taxation of the digital economy in line with the wider G20 and OECD discussions and welcomes the opportunity to comment on the scope of the initiative.

LinkedInX
F

Fecc

· · filed 10 Feb 2021 · source

While acknowledging the consultation for a fair and competitive digital economy Fecc would like to raise the following points: 1. On the scope and definition of digital activities/transactions or companies subject to the initiative - Fecc welcomes the initiative of the Commission and the national Competent Authorities to further promote digitalisation within the EU, provided that it is in accordance with the…

LinkedInX
EE

Ecommerce Europe

· · filed 10 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Ecommerce Europe, the European Digital Commerce Association, welcomes the opportunity to provide constructive feedback to the European Commission’s inception impact assessment (i.e. roadmap) on the introduction of a European digital tax called “a fair & competitive digital economy – digital levy”, which was published on 14 January 2021. Please refer to the detailed Position Paper attached for further information.

LinkedInX
E

ESBG

· · filed 10 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

ESBG welcomes the opportunity to comment on the EC’s Roadmap. In our opinion, it is most important that a precise distinction is made as to which companies are to be covered by the digital tax. Therefore, this differentiation should primarily be done based on the core business of a company and based on how the business is conducted.

LinkedInX
GI

GISAD i.G.

· · filed 10 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

> > Challenges from the perspective of a European Digital System (EU-D-S): Gisad welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to create a fair and competitive digital economy. The Commission refers to G20 and OECD level initiatives to achieve a world-wide digital release. A separate EU tax makes sense only if it supports the specific objectives of the EU.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CC

Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe)

· · filed 10 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

CCIA strongly supports efforts at the G20/OECD-level to reform the international corporate tax framework. This remains the optimal forum to address tax challenges linked to the digitalisation of the economy. The renewed U.S. and EU support for this historic undertaking holds the promise of developing a durable global tax reform.

LinkedInX
ET

eu travel tech

· · filed 9 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

In this paper, eu travel tech sets out its initial views on the possibility of the EU applying a digital levy to digital companies, based on the European Commission Inception Impact Assessment. eu travel tech acknowledges that today’s world economy has been fundamentally transformed, with digitalisation enhancing and permeating all sectors.

LinkedInX
P

Prosus

· · filed 9 Feb 2021 · source

PDF

Prosus, an EU-headquartered, global consumer internet group and one of the largest technology investors in the world (www.prosus.com), welcomes the possibility to contribute to the design of a modern, stable regulatory and tax framework for the digital economy in the EU. We strongly support the aim to reach a global, profit-based solution to the challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy.

LinkedInX
CO

Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic

· · filed 8 Feb 2021 · source

Opinion of the Confederation of industry of the Czech Rep. (Inception impact assessment): We prefer the solution including all crucial countries which represents consensus at the OECD level. OECD consensus represents a relevant effort to modernise the tax system and to adapt the current tax system to the structure of the economy where new forms of digital business appeared (and for these new forms of business the…

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 35 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.