Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Onboarding of users to the European Digital Identity Wallets

15 submissions from 15 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 36 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 15 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

12 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 2 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 12Civil society 2Public authorities, academia, other 1

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 30 Dec 2025 — it ran from 2 Dec 2025.

Policy area
Digital & tech (DG CNECT)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Jun 2026

How it got here

  1. Draft implementing regulation30 Dec 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Implementing regulation.

15 positions

SA

Signicat AS

· · filed 30 Dec 2025 · source

Signicat is one of Europe's leading providers of identity-related services and also provides the editor of hte referenced ETSI TS 119 461 standard. We would like to provide the following feedback on this draft implementing act. The implementing act only considers the identity proofing part of onboarding.

LinkedInX
GB

German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC)

· · filed 30 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

This submission is made by the German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC), the joint committee of the central associations of the German banking industry representing around 1,700 banks in Germany. It concerns the European Commissions draft implementing act on the onboarding of users to the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDIW) under eIDAS 2.0.

LinkedInX
DF

Digital Freedom Foundation

· · filed 29 Dec 2025 · source

Feedback from the Digital Freedom Foundation: The proposed text relies on the technical standard ETSI TS 119 461 V2.1.1 2025-02, but while that standard lays out a technical model for an implementation, it has no other considerations, giving way to dangerous interpretations of how can such implementation exist in compliance with our needs and principles, and safeguarding European citizens' rights.

LinkedInX
ZS

Zalando SE

· · filed 29 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

Zalando welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission's draft Implementing Regulation under eIDAS2, concerning the onboarding of users to the European Digital Identity Wallets (EUDIW). We fully support the Commissions objective of fostering a high level of trust, security and a harmonised approach across Member States for remote onboarding of Wallet users.

LinkedInX
I

iProov

· · filed 28 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

iProov welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the consultation on the draft Implementing Act regarding the onboarding of users to the European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet. While we strongly support the Commissions ambition to establish a harmonised, secure, and interoperable digital identity framework, our technical and economic analysis has identified structural risks within the current draft that threaten…

LinkedInX
IE

IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it

· · filed 26 Dec 2025 · source

This implementing act establishes a list of reference standards for the inclusion of users in the European Digital Identity Wallet system. Given the importance of smooth entry procedures, the reference standards set out the requirements that must be met when remote identity verification is used for user entry. This identity must be based on the national tax number.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AP

Aruba PEC S.p.A.

· · filed 23 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

Aruba PEC is pleased to participate in the European Commissions public consultation on the Implementing Act concerning onboarding requirements for the European Digital Identity Wallets. In its contribution, Aruba PEC highlights the importance of proportionality, legal certainty, and operational clarity for market participants.

LinkedInX
A

Assocertificatori

· · filed 23 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

AssoCertificatori is pleased to contribute to the European Commissions public consultation on the implementing act under examination and thanks the Commission for this opportunity. In our contribution, we underline the importance of a proportionate, risk-based approach that reflects operational realities and market capacity.

LinkedInX
N

NamirialSpA

· · filed 23 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

Namirial S.p.A. is a leading provider of secure digital transaction management services and solutions. Established in 2000 in Italy, the company is now a multinational company that provides software solutions and Digital Trust Services for the digitalization of businesses and public administration entities.

LinkedInX
EC

European Credit Sector Associations

· · filed 22 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

The European Credit Sector Associations (European Association of Co-operative Banks, European Banking Federation, and European Savings and Retail Banking Group - ECSAs) are supportive of the ambition to establish a coherent Europe-wide framework for digital identity (eIDAS 2.0).

LinkedInX
BE

Bitkom e.V.

· · filed 19 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

From Bitkoms perspective, clearer provisions are needed on wallet and device binding, closer alignment with established European standards, and a flexible identity proofing approach besides the eID as the reference method for identification that supports fully automated onboarding and hybrid onboarding when strict security requirement are not met in well-defined and secure scenarios.

LinkedInX
SD

State Digital Development Agency

· · filed 18 Dec 2025 · source

Latvia support the automation and remote onboarding for the European Digital Identity Wallet, provided that it is implemented in a risk-based and nationally adaptable manner. Onboarding approaches should depend on the trust level of the identity means relied upon in each Member State.

LinkedInX
NG

Nect GmbH

· · filed 16 Dec 2025 · source

Comment on eIDAS2 CIR for EUDI Wallet User Onboarding Nect GmbH Nect GmbH, founded in 2017, is one of Germanys leading providers of secure, AI-based digital identification solutions. Our Nect Wallet app offers eIDAS-compliant identity proofing methods, including automated video identification, NFC-based eID & eMRTD verification, and qualified electronic signatures (QES).

LinkedInX
SA

Secours.ai Inc.

· · filed 4 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

The proposed Draft Implementing Act for user onboarding to European Digital Identity Wallets provides a solid foundation for upgrading existing eIDAS users to wallet access. I welcome the emphasis on technology-neutrality, remote identity proofing, and inclusion of automated methods, which are essential to accelerating adoption of the EUDI Wallet across the EU.

LinkedInX
TG

The Good Lobby HUB Spain

· · filed 2 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

When Innovations & all platforms are supprted the circular Communication & online management is Easy via AI & generativeAI to include digital efforts & calculate all rights. Perhaps Revolute or any global Digital wallet will be safe to use & give access to human rights & the copy right created automatic Will help organisations like Euipo & WIPO to include best acts & create Justice & in many countries there is no…

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 15 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.