natur&ëmwelt welcomes the initiative for binding restoration targets and recommends the following: A. Aspects guiding the next steps 1. With this restoration initiative, the Commission should focus on binding nature restoration targets. 2. The also mentioned possibility of an EU wide methodology to map and assess ecosystems and their delivery on soil, pollination etc.
NMS
natur&ëmwelt a.s.b.l.
NGO · Luxembourg
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track natur&ëmwelt in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at natur&ëmwelt a.s.b.l.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
natur&ëmwelt a.s.b.l. filed 4 positions between 2 Apr 2020 and 31 Mar 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2020 · 2 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Compliance with the DNSH principle in the next MFF could be assessed in two simple steps. First stage: the activities are compared with two lists: an exclusion list (significant damage, no EU funding) and a eligibility list (no expected environmental impact). If an activity appears on any of these lists, it is automatically compliant or non-compliant, and the assessment stops.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Dear Madame/Sir, As an organisation working on protecting the environment we know about the importance of access to justice for ensuring compliance with EU law and to address the ecological crisis, both at Member State and EU level. We therefore very much welcome the European Commission consultation on the Roadmap. We’d like to stress the following points: 1.
Although the proposal is presented as favourable to farmers, it mainly aims to reduce administrative burdens for Member States, while weakening the Commission’s control over CAP expenditure and challenging essential environmental guarantees. These measures are not in the interests of farmers in the long term.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put natur&ëmwelt a.s.b.l. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 35.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from natur&ëmwelt a.s.b.l.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.