NGO · Portugal · EU Transparency Register 400884438161-15
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #412 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
Declares membership of
WWF Portugal is a member of the following coalitions:
1) C7 Coalition: informal coalition of 7 Portuguese ENGOs, which includes FAPAS (Fundo para a Proteção dos Animais Se…
2) WWF network: WWF Portugal is a full member of the WWF network, meaning we are a WWF National Office.
3) Oceano Livre Platform: a platform of Portuguese NGOs opposing deep seabed mining in Portuguese waters.
4) "Participate in CAP-SP" Coalition: informal coalition of 27 organizations trying to improve public participation i…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
WWF Portugal
Head office
Lisbon, Portugal
EU office
Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
ANP|WWF filed 3 positions between 10 Dec 2020 and 21 Feb 2024, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Offshore renewable energy is an important part of promoting the European energy transition towards a resilient and fully decarbonised economy, but it should be seen from the perspective of the increasing degradation of the health of our ocean.
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
Delivery of the Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance in practice, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver for the environment and human health.
ANP|WWF welcomes the EC’s report yet deplores the confirmation that overfishing has increased in EU waters. If “fisheries in the EU grow in sustainability”, they aren’t all doing so at a pace reflecting the urgency of the situation, or at all, and remedial measures to restore certain fish stocks will not suffice in themselves so long as quotas are set unsustainably.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ANP|WWF next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from ANP|WWF’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.