Other · Germany · EU Transparency Register 600994616595-50
6
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #605 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
http://www.dfwr.de/
http://www.cepf-eu.org/
http://www.familyforestry.net
https://www.bioenergie.de/
https://www.bauernverband.de/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Waldbesitzerverbände e. V. (AGDW)
Head office
Berlin, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at AGDW die Waldeigentümer? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
AGDW die Waldeigentümer filed 6 positions between 25 Nov 2020 and 9 Jul 2024, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
AGDW supports the objective of increasing the share of renewable energy in energy consumption from 32 % to 40 % by 2030. Energy from sustainable forest management residues is an indispensable element of a sustainable energy mix. However, we have serious concerns about the amended sustainability criteria for forest biomass in the draft revised RED II Directive submitted on 14.7.2021.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
AGDW forest owners consider the following key points for further discussion on the preparation of a proposal on legally binding EU restoration targets • All terms used should be clearly defined and agreed by consensus before further steps; • ensure coherence with existing EU legislation and recognise relevant existing legislation at national level; • the objectives must be realistic, achievable and based on the best…
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Forest owners are concerned about the new carbon reduction target of 310 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent, which could lead to a reduction in the quantities harvested in sustainably managed forests. A possible decline in harvest levels hampers the active contribution of forests to the fight against climate change.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
• After forests and forest owners are (and a fortiori become) affected by climate change, the starting point for climate change policy must always be a realistic view of the overall situation: How many additional THGs can still sustain the atmosphere as a whole in order not to exceed what level of global warming? How much of this comes from the EU?
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The AGDW – Forest owners generally welcome the ambition at European level to reduce CO2 emissions and strengthen the natural forest sink with its CO2 sequestration performance. In order to achieve the new overall EU target of 310 Mt CO-eq, Member States are required to maintain and expand their carbon pools.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The general principles of the Aarhus Convention (AC) are important. However, there is no indication in the AC background papers or in other primary legal sources of the interpretation put forward by the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC), which allows any group or group that identifies itself as a stakeholder to participate in administrative, legal or other processes involving an environmental aspect…
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put AGDW die Waldeigentümer next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from AGDW die Waldeigentümer’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.